The impact of ESG rankings on credit spreads of corporate bonds in Russia

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The article discusses the impact of corporate ESG activity on the cost of bond issues in the context of the growing interest in sustainable development in Russia. Using panel data models and the ESG rankings of the RAEX rating agency, we demonstrate the significant impact of sustainable performance indicators on credit yield spreads using a sample of 2,646 corporate bond issues of 328 manufacturing companies and 76 financial organizations between the second half of 2019 and the end of 2023. We employ unique data on the dynamics of ESG rankings for each of the components (E - environmental, S - social and G - governance) across a wide range of companies. The explanatory variables include characteristics of bonds and issuers as well as macroeconomic indicators. We show that companies moving up in the ESG ranking in both sectors of the economy reduce their cost of bond issues. ESG components have a uniform impact for manufacturing companies yet show a varying influence for financial organizations. High environmental and social indicators increase a required bond yield, while a high governance component reduces it. Investors value information transparency in both sectors. Real-sector companies place greater importance on environmental and social responsibility, despite the associated costs, while the financial sector often views it as unnecessary. Sustainable bonds enable the Russian economy to adopt the ESG agenda faster. Our findings assist bond issuers in calculating risk premiums more realistically and allow corporate bond investors to consider sustainable development when making investment decisions.

About the authors

A. Abramov

Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Moscow, Russia

Author for correspondence.
Email: ae_abramov@mail.ru

M. Chernova

Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Moscow, Russia

Email: chernova-mi@ranepa.ru

A. Shcherbak

Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Moscow, Russia

Email: ascherbak-18@edu.ranepa.ru

References

  1. Freeman R. E. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge university press. 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139192675
  2. Pfeffer J., Salancik G. External control of organizations – Resource dependence perspective. Organizational behavior 2. 2015;355-370.
  3. Jensen M. C., Meckling W. H. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Corporate governance. 2019;77-132.
  4. Myers S. C. Capital structure. Journal of Economic perspectives. 2001; 15(2):81-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.15.2.81
  5. Schneider T.E. Is environmental performance a determinant of bond pricing? Evidence from the US pulp and paper and chemical industries. Contemporary Accounting Research. 2011;28(5):1537-1561. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2010.01064.x
  6. Eichholtz P. M. A., Holtermans R., Kok N., Yonder E. Environmental performance and the cost of debt: Evidence from commercial mortgages and REIT bonds. Journal of Banking & Finance. 2019;102(19):19-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2019.02.015
  7. Polbennikov S., Desclee A., Dynkin L., Maitra A. ESG ratings and performance of corporate bonds. The Journal of Fixed Income. 2016;26(1):21-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3905/jfi.2016.26.1.021
  8. Bhojraj S., Sengupta P. Effect of corporate governance on bond ratings and yields: The role of institutional investors and outside directors. The Journal of Business. 2003;76(3):455-475. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/344114
  9. Ge W., Liu M. Corporate social responsibility and the cost of corporate bonds. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy. 2015;34(6):597-624. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2015.05.008
  10. Oikonomou I., Brooks C., Pavelin S. The effects of corporate social performance on the cost of corporate debt and credit ratings. Financial Review. 2014;49(1):49-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/fire.12025
  11. Stellner C., Klein C., Zwergel B. Corporate social responsibility and Eurozone corporate bonds: The moderating role of country sustainability. Journal of Banking & Finance. 2015;59:538-549. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.04.032
  12. Huang H. H., Liu C., Sun L. Chemical releases and corporate cash holdings. International Review of Financial Analysis. 2019;64:159-173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2019.05.004
  13. Menz K. M. Corporate social responsibility: Is it rewarded by the corporate bond market? A critical note. Journal of business ethics. 2010;96(1):117-134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0452-y
  14. Lu. Wenpeng, Ming-Feng Wu, Ze-Jiong Zhou. Analysis of Financial Investment Strategy of Manufacturing Enterprises under ESG System. Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences. 2022;2(7):1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54691/fhss.v2i7.1296
  15. Hill J. Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) investing: A balanced analysis of the theory and practice of a sustainable portfolio. Academic Press. 2020.
  16. Buallay A. Sustainability reporting and firm’s performance: Comparative study between manufacturing and banking sectors. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. 2020;69(3):431-445. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-10-2018-0371
  17. Ivashkovskaya I., Mikhaylova A. Do investors pay yield premiums on green bonds? Journal of Corporate Finance Research. 2020;14(2):7-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/j.jcfr.2073-0438.14.2.2020.7-21
  18. Makeeva E. Yu., Popov K. A., Dikhtyar A. A., Sudakova A. A. et al. The relationship of board of directors analytics with ESG ratings and the value of Russian companies. Russian Journal of Management. 2022;20(4):498-523. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu18.2022.403
  19. Martynova Y., Lukina I. Impact of ESG Ratings on Companies’ Financial Performance: Evidence from Asia. Journal of Corporate Finance Research. 2023;17(3):116-128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/j.jcfr.2073-0438.17.3.2023.116-128
  20. Strekalina A. et al. The Impact of ESG Ratings on Financial Performance of the Companies: Evidence from BRICS Countries. Journal of Corporate Finance Research. 2023;17(4):93-113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/j.jcfr.2073-0438.17.4.2023.93-113
  21. Musa Uba Adamu. Ivashkovskaya I. Corporate governance and risk disclosure in emerging countries. Journal of Corporate Finance Research. 2021;15(4):5-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/j.jcfr.2073-0438.15.4.2021.5-17
  22. Minor D., Morgan J. CSR as reputation insurance: Primum non nocere. California Management Review. 2011;53(3):40-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2011.53.3.40
  23. Villhauer B. My bank is washing greener: The financial industry's eco-lies. 1 up. Hirzel. Stuttgart. 2023;1:161.
  24. Frecautan I., Ivashkovskaya I. Is corporate governance important for green bond performance in emerging capital markets? Eurasian Economic Review.2024;1-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40822-023-00249-5

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2024 Abramov A., Chernova M., Shcherbak A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.