Influence of Сountry-Specific Determinants on Performance of Small and Medium Enterprises of Europe

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

A lot of obstacles stand in the way of small and medium enterprises formation. One of the first ones is an external financing gap in the majority of Central and Eastern Europe countries. Considering the totality of problems identified by entrepreneurs one may notice that the major part of them is made up of external impact factors.
The purpose of the present study is revealing the influence of country-specific determinants on performance of small and medium enterprises in 24 European countries. The research analyzed 54,512 SME within the period of 2013 to 2017.
The practical value of the research consists in the fact that its results may be useful for: governmental agencies in optimizing the existing small and medium enterprises support programs, emergent entrepreneurs when choosing the country to start up their business and for a better understanding of their environment, management when choosing the ways of entrepreneurship geographical expansion.
The applied importance of this paper consists in defining the most significant country-specific determinants of SME performance.
The regression analysis results show that the majority of small and medium enterprises from the point of view of macroeconomic and political conditions exist “in spite of, not thanks to something”. We also identified a negative relation between the government machinery efficiency as such and its efficiency in relation to SME which means that a lot of effort is necessary for improvement in this sphere. Analysis of the difference between developed and emerging countries revealed a slight positive influence of corruption on SME’s return on assets in emerging countries. Northern Europe is considered to be the friendliest region for small and medium enterprises while Eastern Europe is the least favourable one.

About the authors

B. Kushubakova

Author for correspondence.
Email: kushubakova@yandex.ru

S. Strakhova

Email: sofya.strakhova@yandex.ru

References

  1. De Jong A., Nguyen T. T., Kabir R. Capital Structure Around the World: The Roles of Firm- and Country-Specific Determinants. Journal of Banking and Finance. 2008;32(9).
  2. Jõeveer K. Firm, country and macroeconomic determinants of capital structure: Evidence from transition economies. Journal of Comparative Economics. Elsevier. 2013;41(1):294-308.
  3. Koralun-Bereźnicka J. On the Relative Importance of Corporate Working Capital Determinants: Findings from the EU Countries. Contemporary Economics. 2014;8(4):415-434.
  4. Covin J.G., Slevin D.P. Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal. 1989;10(1):75-87.
  5. Rauch A., Frese M. A contingency approach to small scale business success: A longitudinal study on the effects of environmental hostility and uncertainty on the relationship of planning and success. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research. 1998:190-200.
  6. Dobbs M., Hamilton R. Small business growth: Recent evidence and new directions. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research. 2007;13(5):296-322.
  7. Simpson M., Padmore J., Newman N. Towards a new model of success and performance in SMEs. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research. 2012;18(3):264-285.
  8. Sinitsyna E.D. Sravnitel'nyi analiz effektivnosti nalogovykh i byudzhetnykh mer podderzhki malogo predprinimatelstva v Rossii. Vestnik VolGU. 2017;9(15):138-145. (In Russ.).
  9. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. Global Report 2016/17. Global Entrepreneurship Research Association (GERA); 2017.
  10. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Adult Population Survey. URL: https://www.gemconsortium.org/data/sets (accessed 20.01.2019).
  11. Podtserob M. S 2014 goda uroven' predprinimatelskoi aktivnosti vyros v Rossii na tret' - GEM. 2017. URL: https://www.vedomosti.ru/management/articles/2017/02/07/676449-uroven-predprinimatelskoi-aktivnosti (accessed 13.03.2019). (In Russ.).
  12. World Bank. Ease of Doing Business. URL: http://www.doingbusiness.org/en/rankings (accessed 23.01.2019).
  13. Konings J., Rizov M., Vandenbusschedet H. Investment and financial constraints in transition economies: micro evidence from Poland, the Czech Republic, Bulgaria and Romania. Economics Letters. 2003;78(2):253-258.
  14. Forbes. Best Countries for Business. URL: https://www.forbes.com/best-countries-for-business/list/#tab:overall (accessed 23.01.2019).
  15. Mc Cahery J., Lopez de Silanes F., Schoenmaker D., Stanisic D. The European Capital Markets Study: Estimating the Financing Gaps of SMEs. 2015.
  16. Financing SMEs and Entrepreneurs 2018: An OECD Scoreboard. OECD Publishing, Paris. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/fin_sme_ent-2018-en (accessed 23.01.2019).
  17. OECD Studies on SME and Entrepreneurship. OECD Publishing, Paris. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10/1787/978926423907-en (accessed 20.01.2019).
  18. McCahery J.A. Estimating the SME Financing Gap in Europe. 2018.
  19. Rupeika-Apoga R. Financing in SMEs: Case of the Baltic States. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014;150(15):116-125.
  20. Simpson M., Tuck N., Bellamy S. Small business success factors: The role of education and training. Education and Training. 2004;46(8/9):481-491.
  21. Watson K., Hogarth-Scott S., Wilson N. Small business start-ups: Success factors and support implications. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research. 1998;4(3):217-238.
  22. Khairullina D.R. Faktory, opredelyayushchie razvitie malogo biznesa. Upravlenie ekonomicheskimi sistemami: elektronnyi nauchnyi zhurnal. 2017;97(3):4. (In Russ.).
  23. Cooper A.C., Gimeno-Gascon F.J., Woo C.Y. Initial human and financial capital as predictors of new venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing. 1994;9(5):371-395.
  24. Russel D. Model' dlya analiza raboty soveta direktorov: rol' vnutrennikh i vneshnikh funktsii nezavisimykh direktorov. Journal of Corporate Finance Research / Korporativnye Finansy. 2010;2(2):110-124. (In Russ.).
  25. Theriou G., Chatzoudes D., Matlay H. Exploring the entrepreneurship-performance relationship: Evidence from Greek SMEs. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development. 2015;22(2):352-375.
  26. Meijaard J., Brand M.J., Mosselman M. Organizational structure and performance in Dutch small firms. Small Business Economics. 2005;25(1):83-96.
  27. Choueke R., Armstrong R. Culture: A missing perspective on small-and medium-sized enterprise development? International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research. 2000;6(4):227-238.
  28. Stewart W.H., Roth P.L. Risk propensity differences between entrepreneurs and managers: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2001;86(1):145-153.
  29. Shirokova G.V., Bogatyreva K.A. Vzaimosvyaz' predprinimatelskoi orientatsii i rezul'tatov deyatel'nosti firmy: rezul'taty issledovaniya rossiiskikh firm malogo i srednego biznesa. Vestn. S.-Peterb. un-ta. 2014;8(1):3-27. (In Russ.).
  30. Mueller S.L., Thomas A.S. Culture and entrepreneurial potential: A nine country study of locus of control and innovativeness. Journal of Business Venturing. 2001;16(1):51-75.
  31. Benzing C., Chu H.M., Kara O. Entrepreneurs in Turkey: A factor analysis of motivations, success factors, and problems. Journal of Small Business Management. 2009;47(1):58-91.
  32. Country comparison. Hofstede Insights. URL: https://www.hofstede-insights.com/country-comparison/russia/ (accessed 13.03.2019).
  33. NG S.I., LIM X.J. Are Hofstede's and Schwartz's values frameworks equally predictive across contexts? 2019;21(1):33-47.
  34. Rogoff E.G., Lee M.S., Suh D.C. "Who done it?" attributions by entrepreneurs and experts of the factors that cause and impede small business success. Journal of Small Business Management. 2004;42(4):364-376.
  35. Halabi C.E., Lussier R.N. A model for predicting small firm performance: Increasing the probability of entrepreneurial success in Chile. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development. 2014;21(1):4-25.
  36. Karpak B., Topcu I. Small medium manufacturing enterprises in Turkey: An analytic network process framework for prioritizing factors affecting success. International Journal of Production Economics. 2010;125(1):60-70.
  37. Lampadarios E. Critical success factors for SMEs: An empirical study in the UK chemical distribution industry. International Journal of Business and Management. 2016;11(7):67-82.
  38. Shirokova G.V., Tsukanova T.V. Vliyanie natsional'noi institutisional'noi sredy na stepen' internatsionalizatsii firm malogo i srednego biznesa iz stran s perekhodnymi ekonomikami. Vestn. S.-Peterb. un-ta. 2012;8(1):26-51. (In Russ.).
  39. Munck G.L. Measures of Democracy, Governance and Rule of Law: An Overview of Cross-National Data Sets. 2003. URL: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EXTWBIGOVANTCOR/Resources/Measuresofdemocracy.pdf (accessed 27.02.2019).
  40. Vasilenok V.L., Aleksashkina E.I. Razvitie predprinimatel'stva i faktory, ego opredelyayushchie. Science journal NRU ITMO. Seriya «Ekonomika i ekologicheskii menedzhment». 2013;12(1):8-9. (In Russ.).
  41. Audretsch D.B., Mahmood T. New-firm survival: New results using a hazard function. Review of Economics and Statistics. 1995;77:97-103.
  42. Gupta K. Do economic and societal factors influence the financial performance of alternative energy firms? Energy Economics. Elsevier. 2017;65:172-182.
  43. Perez-de-lema D.G., Hansen P., Madrid-Gujjarro A., Silva-Santos J.L. Influence of the business environment in the dynamics of innovation and in the performance of SMEs. International Journal of Innovation Management. 2018. URL: https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S1363919619500440?journalCode=ijjm (accessed 17.03.2019).
  44. Audretsch D.B. New Firm Survival and the Technological Regime. Review of Economics and Statistics. 1991;68:520-526.
  45. Agarwal R., Audretsch D.B. Does Entry Size Matter? The Impact of the Life Cycle and Technology on Firm Survival. Journal of Industrial Economics. 2001;49:21-43.
  46. Vu H., Tran T.Q., Nguyen T., Lim S. Corruption, types of corruption and firm financial performance: New evidence from a transitional economy. Journal of Business Ethics. 2016:1-12.
  47. Safavian M.S., Graham D.H. Corruption and Microenterprises in Russia. World Development. Elsevier. 2000;29(7):1215-1224.
  48. Tonoyan V., Strohmeyer R., Habib M., Perlitz M. Corruption and entrepreneurship: how formal and informal institutions shape small firm behavior in transition and mature market economies. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2010;34(5):803-832.
  49. Gladysheva A., Kishilova J. Vliyanie politicheskikh svyazei i gosudarstvennoi sobstvennosti na deyatel'nost' firm v Rossii. Journal of Corporate Finance Research / Korporativnye Finansy. 2018;12(1):20-43. (In Russ.).
  50. Hunady J. Individual and institutional determinants of corruption in the EU countries: the problem of its tolerance. Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics. Springer; Fondazione Edison. 2017;34(1):139-157.
  51. Sharma C., Mitra A. Corruption, governance and firm performance: Evidence from Indian enterprises. Journal of Policy Modeling. Elsevier. 2015;37(5):835-851.
  52. Angulo-Ruiz F., Pergelova A. The impact of government financial support on the performance of new firms: the role of competitive advantage as an intermediate outcome. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development. 2014;26(9-10):663-705.
  53. Borbas L. Supporting SMEs in Central-Eastern Europe. Volume of Management, Enterprise and Benchmarking in the 21st Century. 2014:87-106.
  54. Berko L., Agota G. Policy for Support of Small and Medium-size Enterprises in Hungary: The Case of the Central Region. Post-Communist Economies. 2003;15(2):243-257.
  55. Galbraith B., McAdam R., Woods J., McGowan T. Putting policy into practice: an exploratory study of SME innovation support in a peripheral UK region. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development. 2017:1-20.
  56. Bergström F. Capital subsidies and the performance of firms. Small Business Economics. 2000;14(3):183-193.
  57. Zhang H., Li L., Zhou D., Zhou P. Political connections, government subsidies and firm financial performance: Evidence from renewable energy manufacturing in China. Renewable Energy. 2014;63(2):330-336.
  58. Hansen H., Rand J., Tarp F. Enterprise growth and survival in Vietnam: does government support matter? The Journal of Development Studies. 2009;45(7):1048-1069.
  59. Majocchi A., Valle L.D., D’angelo A. Internationalisation, culture distance and country characteristics: a Bayesian analysis of SMEs financial performance. Journal of Business Economics and Management. 2013;16(2):307-324.
  60. Delener N., Farooq O., Bakhadirov M. Is Innovation a Determinant for SME Performance? Cross-Country Analysis of the Economies of Former USSR Countries. Entrepreneurship in Transition Economies. Springer International Publishing; 2017:97-111.
  61. Kwamena Minta Nyarku, Stephen Oduro. Examining the Effect of Corruption and Bureaucracy on SMEs Growth in the Kumasi Metropolis of Ghana. Universities, Entrepreneurship and Enterprise Development in Africa, German African University Partnership Platform for the Development of Entrepreneurs and Small/Medium Enterprises. 2017. URL: https://pub.h-brs.de/frontdoor/deliver/index/docId/3425/file/GAUP_Conference_Proceedings_2017_154.pdf (accessed 27.03.2019).
  62. Whittington G. The profitability and size of United Kingdom companies, 1960-1974. The Journal of Industrial Economics. 1980;25(4):334-352.
  63. Hall M., Weiss L. Firm size and profitability. Review of Economics and Statistics. 1967;49:319-331.
  64. Ramasamy B., Ong D., Yeung M.C.H. Firm size, ownership and performance in the Malaysian palm oil industry. Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance. 2005;1:81-104.
  65. Gebreeyesus M. Innovation and microenterprises growth in Ethiopia. UNUMERIT working papers. 2009. URL: http://www.merit.unu.edu/publications/wppdf/2009/wp2009-053.pdf (accessed 23.01.2019).
  66. Modigliani F., Miller M. Corporate income taxes and the cost of capital: A correction. American Economic Review. 1963;53:433-443.
  67. Myers S., Majluf N. Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics. 1984;13(2):187-221.
  68. Degryse H., Goeij P., Kappert P. The impact of firm and industry characteristics on small firms' capital structure. Small Business Economics. 2012;38(4):431-447.
  69. Mateev M., Poutziouris P., Ivanov K. On the determinants of SME capital structure in Central and Eastern Europe: A dynamic panel analysis. Research in International Business and Finance. 2013;27(1):28-51.
  70. Serrasqueiro Z., Nunes P. The capital structure of Portuguese SMEs: Empirical evidence using Dynamic Panel Data. Transformation in Business & Economics. 2011;10(1):62-80.
  71. Zdráhal I., Chmelíková G., Blažková I. Sector-Wide and Country-Specific Drivers of Firm Performance in the Visegrad Group Dairy Industry. AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics. 2018;10(4):89-100.
  72. Sadeghi A. Success factors of high-tech SMEs in Iran: A fuzzy MCDM approach. The Journal of High Technology Management Research. 2018;29(1):71-87.
  73. Kobrin S.J. Political risk: a review and reconsideration. Journal of International Business Studies. 1979;10(1):67-80.
  74. Butler K.C., Domingo Castelo J. A note on political risk and the required return on foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business. 1998;29(3):599-607.
  75. Henisz W.J. The institutional environment for economic growth. Economics and Politics. 2000;12(1):1-31.
  76. Zahra S.A., Garvis D.M. International corporate entrepreneurship and firm performance: The moderating effect of international environmental hostility. Journal of Business Venturing. 2000;15(5):469-492.
  77. Andersen T.J. Multinational risk and performance outcomes: effects of knowledge intensity and industry context. International Business Review. 2012;21(2):239-252.
  78. Click R.W. Financial and political risks in US direct foreign investment. Journal of International Business Studies. 2005;36(5):559-575.
  79. Golikova V., Kuznetsov B. Suboptimal Size: Factors Preventing the Growth of Russian Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises. Foresight and STI Governance. National Research University Higher School of Economics. 2017;11(3):83-93.
  80. Thapa A. Determinants of microenterprise performance in Nepal. Small Business Economics. 2015;45(3):581-594.
  81. Vávrová D. Approaches to the classification of high-tech companies from the negative and positive point of view. Perspectives of Business and Entrepreneurship Development in Digital Age. 2017;16:125-136.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2020 Kushubakova B., Strakhova S.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.