Investigation of the Influence of Internal Control System Factors on the Financial Stability of Companies (Review)

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Annotation. The quality of the internal control system can have a significant impact on decision-making by users of financial information and on the negative economic consequences of the organization's economic activities (bankruptcy, fictitious audit reports, etc.). The author suggests that these consequences are typical for Russian organizations due to their poor study of the factors that affect the system of internal control of organizations. The study reviewed 30 foreign (China, USA and Europe) publications indexed in Scopus and Web of Science on the problem of the influence of external and internal factors on the internal control system of organizations. Based on the results of the analysis of the literature, external and internal factors have been identified that affect the internal control system, which are characteristic of Russian organizations. In addition, the prospects for studying these factors for the internal control system of Russian organizations are outlined.

About the authors

L. Ponomareva

Novosibirsk State Technical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: grigoreva.la@yandex.ru

References

  1. Chalmers K., Hay D., Khlif H. Internal control in accounting research: A review. Journal of Accounting Literature. 2019;42:80–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acclit.2018.03.002
  2. Anti-fraud: What measures are companies taking? Russian economic crime survey 2018. Moscow: PwC; 2018. 28 p. URL: https://www.pwc.ru/ru/forensic-services/assets/PwC-recs-2018-rus.pdf (accessed on 10.04.2020). (In Russ.).
  3. Key indicators of the audit services market in the Russian Federation. Ministry of Finance of Russia. URL: https://www.minfin.ru/ru/perfomance/audit/audit_stat/MainIndex (accessed on 10.04.2020). (In Russ.).
  4. Bardhan I. The quality of internal control over financial reporting in family firms. Accounting Horizon. 2015;29(1):41–60. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-50935
  5. Parker R.J., Dao M., Huang H.-W., Yan Y.-C. Disclosing material weakness in internal controls: Does the gender of audit committee members matter? Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics. 2017;24(3–4):407–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/16081625.2015.1057190
  6. Chen Y., Eshleman J.D., Soileau J.S. Board gender diversity and internal control weaknesses. Advances in Accounting. 2016;33:11–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2016.04.005
  7. Weiss D. Internal controls in family-owned firms. European Accounting Review. 2014;23(3):463–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2013.821814
  8. Bardhan I. The quality of internal control over financial reporting in family firms. Accounting Horizon. 2015;29(1):41–60. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-50935
  9. Shen H., Xiong H., Zheng S., Hou F. Chief executive officer (CEO)’s rural origin and internal control quality. Economic Modelling. 2021;95:441–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2020.03.011
  10. Shu W., Chen Y., Lin B., Chen Y. Does corporate integrity improve the quality of internal control? China Journal of Accounting Research. 2018;11(4):404–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2018.09.002
  11. Lu Y., Cao Y. The individual characteristics of board members and internal control weakness: Evidence from China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal. 2018;51:75–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2018.05.013
  12. Agyei-Mensah B.K. Internal control information disclosure and corporate governance: Evidence from an emerging market. Corporate Governance. 2016;16(1):79–95. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-10-2015-0136
  13. Chang Y.-T., Chen H., Cheng R.K., Chi W. The impact of internal audit attributes on the effectiveness of internal control over operations and compliance. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics. 2019;15(1):1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcae.2018.11.002
  14. Buslepp W., Legoria J., Rosa R., Shaw D. Misclassification of audit-related fees as a measure of internal control quality. Advances in Accounting. 2019;46:100425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2019.100425
  15. Hofstede G. Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organisations across nations. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management. 2001;1(2):243–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/147059580112007
  16. Kanagaretnam K., Lobo G.J., Ma C., Zhou J. National culture and internal control material weaknesses around the world. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance. 2016;31(1):28–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X14560897
  17. Bryan D.B. Organised labor, audit quality, and internal control. Advances in Accounting. 2017;36:11–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2016.09.005
  18. Zhang C., Chen H. Product market competition, state ownership and internal control quality. China Journal of Accounting Studies. 2016;4(4):406–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/21697213.2016.1252078
  19. López D.M., Rich K.T. Geographic distance and municipal internal control reporting. Advances in Accounting. 2017;36:40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2016.08.003
  20. Albring S.M., Elder R.J., Xu X. Unexpected fees and the prediction of material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance. 2018;33(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X16662585
  21. Chen Y., Gul F., Marisetty V., Truong C., Veeraraghavan M. Auditor client specific knowledge and internal control weakness: Some evidence on the role of auditor tenure and geographic distance. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics. 2016;12:114–121. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303979267
  22. Ji X., Lu W. Internal control risk and audit fees: Evidence from China. Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics. 2018;14(3). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326589959
  23. Khlif H., Samaha K. Audit committee activity and internal control quality in Egypt: Does external auditor’s size matter? Managerial Auditing Journal. 2016;31(3):269–289. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-08-2014-1084
  24. International Standards on Auditing 315. Identifying and assessing the risks of material misstatement through understanding the entity and its environment. URL: http://www.ifac.org/system/files/downloads/a017-2010-iaasb-handbook-isa-315.pdf (accessed on 04.09.2019).
  25. Federal Law dated 06.12.2011 No. 402-FZ “On accounting” (as amended on 31.12.2017). URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_122855/ (accessed on 04.09.2019). (In Russ.).
  26. Market analysis in the Spark-INTERFAX system. URL: http://www.spark-interfax.ru/ (accessed on 15.09.2019). (In Russ.).

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2021 Ponomareva L.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.