How Patents Influence Market Value of Industrial Enterprises' Assets?

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Scientists and engineers are continuously patenting innovative ideas such as inventions, industrial designs, and utility models. It is therefore relevant to pose the question of the influence of intellectual property in the field of innovative technologies on the market value of the assets of industrial enterprises.

We analyse the dependence of the results of intellectual activity in the field of advanced technologies on the capitalization of innovative industrial production after the adoption of the developed technologies. We consider patent landscapes, analyse research publications, and study the dependence of financial indicators on the results of intellectual activity at enterprises producing computers, optics and electronic equipment.

Our research methodology is based on the statistical analysis of the dependence of the financial results of industrial enterprises on the actual application of the results of intellectual activity to the technological process. We define the object of analysis by citing research articles and surveys from the WoS database. The patent landscape is assessed using data from commercial information systems such as Orbit Intelligence (Questel) and Amadeus (Bureau van Dijk, Moody’s Analytics) that make it possible to visually show the links between patent activity and technological trends in the computer and electronic technology industries.

The research results shall be useful for assessing the effectiveness of employing patents in manufacturing and the prospects of improving production technologies for the formation of corporate innovative technological policy.

We conclude that the use of information on patent trends is an effective tool for increasing the competitiveness of enterprises producing electronic equipment. The priority financing of innovative technologies ensures the sustainable development of the manufacturing industry and have a positive impact on the profitability of enterprise assets.

About the authors

D. Dementev

Author for correspondence.
Email: dmvit68@yandex.ru

References

  1. Hu D., Liu Z., Zhao J. Will Intellectual Property Rights Policy Increase Foreign Direct Investment and Promote Technological Innovation? Mathematical Problems in Engineering. 2021 Jan 27;2021:1–11.
  2. Krauß J., Kuttenkeuler D. When to file for a patent? The scientist’s perspective. New Biotechnology. 2021 Jan 25;60:124–129.
  3. Hu Y., Hou Y. (Greg), Oxley L., Corbet S. Does blockchain patent‑development influence Bitcoin risk? Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money. 2021 Jan 1;70: [article number or pages].
  4. Miyashita S., Katoh S., Anzai T., Sengoku S. Intellectual property management in publicly funded R&D program and projects: Optimizing principal–agent relationship through transdisciplinary approach. Sustainability (Switzerland). 2020 Dec 1;12(23):1–17.
  5. Yang X., Yu X. Preventing patent risks in artificial intelligence industry for sustainable development: A multi‑level network analysis. Sustainability (Switzerland). 2020 Oct 2;12(20):1–22.
  6. Li B., Xu Z., Zavadskas E.K., Antuchevičienė J., Turskis Z. A bibliometric analysis of symmetry (2009–2019). Symmetry. 2020;12(8): [page/article number].
  7. Zhou W., Xu Z., Zavadskas E.K. A bibliometric overview of the International Journal of Strategic Property Management between 2008 and 2019. 2019;23(6):366–377.
  8. Wang X., Xu Z., Škare M. A bibliometric analysis of Economic Research‑Ekonomska Istraživanja (2007–2019). 2020 Jan 1;33(1):865–886.
  9. Cañas R.M., Caruso N.M., González‑Torres T., Rodríguez‑Sánchez J.-L., Montero‑Navarro A., Es A.M., et al. Visualizing research on industrial clusters and global value chains: A bibliometric analysis. Frontiers in Psychology. 2020;11:1754. Available from: www.frontiersin.org
  10. Huang Y., Ding X.-H., Liu R., He Y., Wu S. Reviewing the domain of technology and innovation management: A visualizing bibliometric analysis. SAGE Open. 2019;9(2). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019854644
  11. Nakagawa S., Samarasinghe G., Haddaway N.R., Westgate M.J., O’Dea R.E., Noble D.W.A., et al. Research weaving: Visualizing the future of research synthesis. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2019;34(3):224–238.
  12. Wang P., Zhu F.W., Song H.Y., Hou J.H., Zhang J.L. Visualizing the academic discipline of knowledge management. Sustainability (Switzerland). 2018;10(3): [article number].
  13. Yu D., Xu Z., Pedrycz W., Wang W., Cañas R.M., Caruso N.M., et al. Visualizing research on industrial clusters and global value chains: A bibliometric analysis. Frontiers in Psychology. 2019 Dec 1;11(2):1754. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019854644
  14. Liao X., Faisal M., Qing Chang Q., Ali A. Evaluating the role of big data in IIoT (Industrial Internet of Things) for executing ranks using the Analytic Network Process approach. Scientific Programming. 2020;2020: [article ID].
  15. Dubuc T., Stahl F., Roesch E.B. Mapping the big data landscape: Technologies, platforms and paradigms for real‑time analytics of data streams. IEEE Access. 2021;9:15351–15374.
  16. Mathrani S., Lai X. Big data analytic framework for organizational leverage. 2021; [journal name], possible doi: 10.3390/app11052340.
  17. Koo J., Kang G., Kim Y.-G. Security and privacy in big data life cycle: A survey and open challenges. Sustainability. Available from: www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability
  18. Brous P., Janssen M. Trusted decision‑making: Data governance for creating trust in data science decision outcomes. Administrative Sciences. 2020;10(4):81.
  19. Na D., Park S. Fusion chain: A decentralized lightweight blockchain for IoT security and privacy. Electronics (Switzerland). 2021;10(4):1–18.
  20. Kiss M., Breda G., Muha L. Information security aspects of Industry 4.0. In: Procedia Manufacturing. Elsevier B.V.; 2019:848–855.
  21. Brock D.C. Learning from artificial intelligence’s previous awakenings: The history of expert systems. AI Magazine. 2018;39(3):3–15.
  22. Alcácer V., Cruz‑Machado V. Scanning the Industry 4.0: A literature review on technologies for manufacturing systems. Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal. 2019;22:899–919.
  23. Korotkova Y.I. Internal capital markets in Russian business groups: Evidence from corporate investments. Journal of Corporate Finance Research. 2020;14(2):58–71.
  24. Khomenko E.V. Review of methods and tools for intellectual property analysis of public sector entities. Journal of Corporate Finance Research. 2020;14(3):63–89.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2021 Dementev D.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.