On the problem of estimating the snowiness of winters by different methods by the example of the Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk city
- Authors: Kazakova E.N.1
-
Affiliations:
- The Special Research Bureau for Automation of Marine Research FEB RAS
- Issue: Vol 64, No 2 (2024)
- Pages: 252-261
- Section: Snow cover and avalanches
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2076-6734/article/view/268495
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S2076673424020087
- ID: 268495
Cite item
Abstract
The problem of estimating a snowiness (a snow coverage) of a territory is considered by many authors, but still nowadays no common approach to its solution is reached. Different authors use different characteristics in their works for estimating the winter snowiness. In this work the snowiness of winters was estimated using different parameters to determine the most representative one. The area ща study is the Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk urban district. The data for the past 36 years (1986–2022) were used to determine the types of the winter snowiness in this district. The following nine methods have been applied: the maximum winter snow reserve; by the amount of solid precipitation; by the average winter thickness of snow cover from the weather station and by snow survey; by the average greatest ten-day thickness of snow cover; by the amount of precipitation in the form of snow; the method of N.N. Galakhov; the Schultz coefficient; and the maximum winter snow cover thickness. The results obtained are very contradictory. Thus, the types of snowiness completely coincided in only 17% of winters; while in 58% of winters the types of snowiness coincided by 2/3 of the above indicators. Estimation of snowiness using various parameters gives closer results when using data on snow reserve at the beginning of snowmelt and the average winter thickness of snow cover (coincidence in 78% of cases). The reason is that a major part of the above methods uses the values of only one parameter. But given that snowiness is a complex indicator, it would be reasonable to consider all possible parameters at the same time. It is impossible to develop a unified approach to estimating winter snowiness, since the parameters chosen for this problem depend on the goal of the determination. It would also be worthwhile to select a methodology for estimating winter snowiness depending on the tasks set, and on the availability and reliability of the initial meteorological data for the analysis. Such work is also complicated by the insufficient volume of meteorological data, as well as due to gaps in them.
Keywords
Full Text

About the authors
E. N. Kazakova
The Special Research Bureau for Automation of Marine Research FEB RAS
Author for correspondence.
Email: kazakova-e-n@yandex.ru
Russian Federation, Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk
References
- Galakhov N. N. Vydelenie tipov zim po vysote i dinamike snezhnogo pokrova na bolshey chasti territorii SSSR. Detection of winter types by depth and dynamics of snow cover across the majority of USSR territory. Rol’ snezhnogo pokrova v prirodnykh protsessakh. The role of snow cover in natural processes. Moscow: Russian Academy of Sciences, 1961: 11–26. [In Russian].
- Genesina A. S. The main synoptic processes in winter over the Sakhalin region. Sneg i laviny Sahalina: sbornik statey. Snow and avalanches of Sakhalin: collection of articles. Leningrad: Hydrometeoizdat, 1975: 5–12. [In Russian].
- Glyatsiologicheskiy slovar’. Glaciological Glossary. Ed. V. M. Kotlyakov. Leningrad: Hydrometeoizdat, 1984: 528 p. [In Russian].
- Medvedeva G. P. The influence of winter snowfall on the formation of the spring flood of the rivers of Western Siberia in 1936–1965. Problemy regional’nogo zemlevedeniya. Problems of regional geoscience, vol. 3. Chita: 1970: 34–36. [In Russian].
- Troshkina E. S., Sapunov V. N., Seliverstov Yu.G., Chernous P. A. Dynamics of snow cover in the Khibiny Mountains (1936–2002). Materialy Glyatsiologicheskikh Issledovaniy. Data of Glaciological Studies. 2003: 112–115. [In Russian].
- Troshkina E. S., Seliverstov Yu.G., Mokrov E. G., Sapunov V. N., Chernous P. A., Soloviev A. Yu. The influence of changes in climatic conditions on nival-glacial processes in the Khibiny Mountains. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Serija 5. Geografija. Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 5. Geography. 2009, 2: 26–32. [In Russian].
- Oleynikov A. D. Application of existing methods of winter typification for avalanche research purposes (using the example of the Western Caucasus. Materialy Glyatsiologicheskikh Issledovaniy. Data of Glaciological Studies. 1982, 45: 70–74. [In Russian].
- Oleynikov A. D. Snowiness of winters in the Krasnaya Polyana region (Western Caucasus). Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 5. Geography. 2010, 2: 39–45. [In Russian].
- Osokin I. M. Geografiya snezhnogo pokrova gornyh rajonov Vostoka Zabajkal’ya. Geography of snow cover in the mountainous regions of the East of Transbaikalia. Chita: Regional publishing house, 1967: 191 p. [In Russian].
- Chernous P. A. On the rationalization of measurements of snow characteristics to assess its stability on a slope. Gidrosfera. Opasnye processy i javlenija. Hydrosphere. Dangerous processes and phenomena. 2019, 1 (1): 114–142. [In Russian]
- Shmakin A. B. Climatic characteristics of snow cover in Northern Eurasia and their changes in recent decades. Led i Sneg. Ice and Snow. 2010, 1: 43–57. [In Russian].
- Yashina A. V. Basic principles for typing winters in the Central European forest-steppe according to the factors of snow cover formation. Izvestiya Ros. Akad. Nauk. Seriya geograficheskaya. Proc. of RAS. Geographical series. 1978, 5: 92–101. [In Russian].
- Medeu A., Blagovechshenskiy V., Gulyayeva T., Zhdanov V., Ranova S. Interannual Variability of Snowiness and Avalanche Activity in the Ile Alatau Ridge, Northern Tien Shan. Water. 2022, 14: 2936.
- Urban G., Richterová D., Kliegrová S., Zusková I., Pawliczek P. Winter severity and snowiness and their multiannual variability in the Karkonosze Mountains and Jizera Mountains. Theor Appl Climatol. 2018, 134: 221–240.
Supplementary files
