Uterine fibroids, laparoscopic surgery and morcellation: comparative analysis of the results of organ-preserving operations
- Authors: Seregin A.A.1, Nadezhdenskaia A.B.2, Makarova A.S.1, Sheshko P.L.1, Tregubova A.V.1, Kirilova E.V.3, Kopnenkova D.K.4, Pronin S.M.1, Khabas G.N.1, Asaturova A.V.1, Ovodenko D.L.1
-
Affiliations:
- Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology
- Astrakhan State Medical University
- Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
- Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
- Issue: Vol 23, No 1 (2021)
- Pages: 73-77
- Section: ORIGINAL ARTICLE
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2079-5831/article/view/63738
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.26442/20795696.2021.1.200561
- ID: 63738
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Aim. To conduct a comparative analysis of the results of organ-preserving laparoscopic operations performed for uterine fibroids with the use of plastic containers for morcellation and without it.
Materials and methods. We examined 57 patients with a diagnosis of uterine fibroids who were admitted to the Department of Innovative Oncology and Gynecology of the Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology for organ-preserving surgical treatment. To achieve the goal of the study, the patients were divided into the following groups: the main group – 29 patients who underwent laparoscopic myomectomy and morcellation of removed nodes using plastic containers. The control group consisted of 28 patients who underwent morcellation during laparoscopic myomectomy without the use of plastic containers.
Results. The duration of laparoscopic operations performed using plastic containers «main group» was 85.69±25.87 minutes. Laparoscopic conservative myomectomies, performed without the use of limiting systems, took a slightly longer amount of time «control group» – 88.75±30.36 minutes. There were no statistically significant differences, but in the second group, more prolonged sanitation of the abdominal cavity and removal of small fragments of myomatous nodes after morcellation outside the sacs were required. Autoinfusion was used in 6 (20.69%) patients in the main group, in 7 (25%) patients in the control group. Blood transfusion was not used in any case. Average blood loss was 120.69±67.50 ml in the main group, 125.00±99.54 ml in the control. The duration of hospitalization in the main group was 4.66±1.76 days, in the control group 5.79±3.62 days. In the main group, histological examination revealed leiomyoma in all cases, leiomyoma was detected in 96.4% (27 patients) of cases in the control group, and leiomyosarcoma in 1 patient (3.6%).
Conclusion. In all groups of patients, there was a favorable course of the postoperative period, early activation of patients. In the group of laparoscopic operations, one patient (3.6%) after morcellation of the myomatous node without the use of a plastic container was found to have leiomyosarcoma. The use of plastic containers in our study did not increase the duration of operations and did not affect the volume of blood loss, the frequency of intra- and postoperative complications. In contrast, the operation time was slightly higher among patients who were operated without the use of containers. In all likelihood, this was due to the fact that the morcellation stage itself took longer, since it was required to extract small fragments of myomatous nodes, as well as thorough and prolonged sanitation of the abdominal cavity. It should be noted that the use of plastic containers, of course, requires the development of certain skills from the surgeon, taking less and less time in parallel with the learning curve. Of course, further studies are required to assess the risk of tumor spread in patients undergoing surgery using plastic containers, but preliminary data indicate that ablastic morcellation can and should be used in organ-preserving surgery for uterine myoma.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Alexander A. Seregin
Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology
Author for correspondence.
Email: ggk32@ya.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5236-3194
Graduate Student
Russian Federation, MoscowAnastasiia B. Nadezhdenskaia
Astrakhan State Medical University
Email: Nastraliana@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0782-5112
obstetrics and gynecology resident
Russian Federation, AstrakhanAnna S. Makarova
Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology
Email: makarovaanna91@mail.ru
obstetrician-gynecologist
Russian Federation, MoscowPolina L. Sheshko
Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology
Email: dr.sheshko@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3905-8026
oncologist, obstetrician-gynecologist
Russian Federation, MoscowAnna V. Tregubova
Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology
Email: annyupitrue@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4601-1330
pathologist
Russian Federation, MoscowEleonora V. Kirilova
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
Email: kirilova.ellie@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2793-9814
Graduate Student
Russian Federation, MoscowDaria K. Kopnenkova
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Email: primadaria95@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7360-6789
Student
Russian Federation, MoscowStanislav M. Pronin
Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology
Email: psm_doc@mail.ru
Cand. Sci. (Med.)
Russian Federation, MoscowGrigory N. Khabas
Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology
Email: khabas@list.ru
Cand. Sci. (Med.)
Russian Federation, MoscowAlexandra V. Asaturova
Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology
Email: a_asaturova@oparina4.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8739-5209
Cand. Sci. (Med.)
Russian Federation, MoscowDmitry L. Ovodenko
Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology
Email: d_ovodenko@oparina4.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0700-8374
Cand. Sci. (Med.)
Russian Federation, MoscowReferences
- Hur HC, King LP, Klebanoff MJ, et al. Fibroid morcellation: a shared clinical decision tool for mode of hysterectomy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2015; 195: 122–7.
- Dubin AK, Wei J, Sullivan S, et al. Minilaparotomy versus laparoscopic myomectomy after cessation of power morcellation: rate of wound complications. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2017; 24 (6): 946–53.
- Brooks SE, Zhan M, Cote T, et al. Surveillance, epidemiology, and end results analysis of 2677 cases of uterine sarcoma 1989–1999. Gynecol Oncol 2004; 93 (1): 204–8.
- Lambat Emery S, Pluchino N, Petignat P, et al. Cell spillage after contained electromechanical morcellation using a specially designed in-bag system for laparoscopic myomectomy: a prospective cohort pilot study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2019; 26 (7): 1351–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.01.014
- Toubia T, Moulder JK, Schiff LD, et al. Peritoneal Washings after Power Morcellation in Laparoscopic Myomectomy: A Pilot Study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2016; 23 (4): 578–81. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.02.001
- Guyon F, Cordeiro Vidal G, Babin G, et al. Impact pronostiques de la morcellation chirurgicale en cas de cancers ute´ rins: du “principe de precaution” au “realisme”. Bull Cancer (Paris) 2016; 103.
- Conventus. To morcellate or not: that’s the question. Conventus 2015. http://www.conventusnj.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/082114.pdf
- DiSaia P, Creasman W. Clinical gynecologic oncology. 8th ed. China: Elsevier Saunders, 2012.
- FIGO committee on gynecologic oncology. FIGO staging for uterine sarcomas. Int J Gynecol Obst 2009; 104: 179.
- ACOG. Power morcellation on occult malignancy in gynecologic surgery. ACOG 2014. Available at: http://www.acog.org/About-ACOG/ News-Room/Statements-and-and-Advisories/2014/ACOG-Statement-on-Power-Morcellation?utm_source=todaysheadlines&utm_medium=email&utm_content=statement_11_24&utm_campaign=morcellation
- AAGL. Morcellation during uterine tissue extraction. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2014; 21 (4): 517–30.
- Brolmann H, Tanos V, Grimbizis G, et al. Options on fibroid morcellation: a literature review. Gynecol Surg 2015; 12 (1): 3–15. doi: 10.1007/s10397-015-0878-4
- Glaser LM, Friedman J, Tsai S, et al. Laparoscopic myomectomy and morcellation: A review of techniques, outcomes, and practice guidelines. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2018; 46: 99–112. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2017.09.012 1521-6934/
Supplementary files
