Gynecological conditions related to the perianal area and coloproctology
- Authors: Khryanin A.A.1,2, Markaryan D.R.3, Agapov M.A.3, Bocharovav V.K.4
-
Affiliations:
- Novosibirsk State Medical University
- Association of Obstetricians-Gynecologists and Dermatovenereologists
- Lomonosov Moscow State University
- Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University
- Issue: Vol 23, No 6 (2021)
- Pages: 472-479
- Section: REVIEW
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2079-5831/article/view/75695
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.26442/20795696.2021.6.201150
- ID: 75695
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
This review is addressed to the specialists who treat and correct pathologies of the perianal area and pelvic floor. The pelvic floor area is a space in which the organs of different systems have a common origin and a common framework, therefore they are located in close contact with each other. In view of these features, all specialists working with pelvic floor dysfunction should be aware of the possible combination with disorders from neighboring organs and systems. The article discusses the most urgent and common proctological and urological problems of pregnant women and maternity women, including perineal damage during vaginal childbirth with the development of anal incontinence and urinary incontinence, rectocele, prolapse and prolapse of pelvic organs. The paper presents a detailed description of all anatomical structures involved in the pathological process, as well as their gradual embryonic development. The article presented in details the disorders, which are lying in the base of pelvic organ dysfunctions, from the point of view of modern anatomical data, and discussed different diagnostic protocols and tactical approaches to the choice of treatment. Special attention is paid to the points of interaction of related specialists (urologists and proctologists) and the need for their joint participation in the medical and diagnostic process. Colorectal surgeons should be aware of the frequently associated gynecological pathologies described in this article. The cooperation of related specialists in the field of working with pelvic floor pathology is necessary to exchange experience and improve the quality of care for this category of patients. The article is illustrated with original drawings and clinical examples “before and after”.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Aleksey A. Khryanin
Novosibirsk State Medical University; Association of Obstetricians-Gynecologists and Dermatovenereologists
Email: khryanin@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9248-8303
D. Sci. (Med.), Prof.
Russian Federation, Novosibirsk; NovosibirskDaniil R. Markaryan
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Email: dmarkaryan@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2711-2400
Cand. Sci. (Med.)
Russian Federation, MoscowMikhail A. Agapov
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Email: khryanin@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6569-7078
D. Sci. (Med.), Prof.
Russian Federation, MoscowValentina K. Bocharovav
Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University
Author for correspondence.
Email: valucha-95@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4671-7288
Medical Resident
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgReferences
- Leroi AM, Weber J, Menard JF, et al. Prevalence of anal incontinence in 409 patients investigated for stress urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 1999;18:579-90. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1520-6777(1999)18:6<579::aid-nau8>3.0.co;2-5
- Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, et al. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89:501-6. doi: 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00058-6
- Eva UF, Gun W, Preben K. Prevalence of urinary and fecal incontinence and symptoms of genital prolapse in women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003;82:280-6. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2003.00103.x
- Swift SE. The distribution of pelvic organ support in a population of female subjects seen for routine gynecologic health care. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183:277-85. doi: 10.1067/mob.2000.107583
- De Lancey JO. Anatomic aspects of vaginal eversion after hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;166:1717-24. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(92)91562-o
- Kearney R, Miller JM, Ashton-Miller JA, et al. Obstetric factors associated with levator ani muscle injury after vaginal birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(1):144-9. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000194063.63206.1c
- Barber MD, Bremer RE, Thor KB, et al. Innervation of the female levator ani muscles. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187:64-71. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.124844
- De Lancey JO. Structural support of the urethra as it relates to stress urinary incontinence: the hammock hypothesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;170:1713-20. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(94)70346-9
- Leffler KS, Thompson JR, Cundiff GW, et al. Attachment of the rectovaginal septum to the pelvic sidewall. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185:41-3. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.116366
- Richardson AC, Lyon JB, Williams NL. A new look at pelvic relaxation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1976;126:568-73. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(76)90751-1
- Achtari C, Hiscock R, O’Reilly BA, et al. Risk factors for mesh erosion after transvaginal surgery using polypropylene (Atrium) or composite polypropylene/polyglactin 910 (Vypro II) mesh. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2005;16:389-94. doi: 10.1007/s00192-004-1272-3
- Higgs PJ, Chua HL, Smith AR. Long term review of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. BJOG. 2005;112:1134-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00646.x
- Consten EC, van Iersel JJ, Verheijen PM, et al. Long-term outcome after laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy: an observational study of 919 consecutive patients. Ann Surg. 2015;262(5):742-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001401; PMID: 26583661
- Randall CL, Nichols DH. Surgical treatment of vaginal inversion. Obstet Gynecol. 1971;38:327-32.
- Meeks GR, Washburne JF, McGehee RP, Wiser WL. Repair of vaginal vault prolapse by suspension of the vagina to iliococcygeus (prespinous) fascia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;171:1444-52. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(94)90386-7
- Shull BL, Bachofen C, Coates KW, Kuehl TJ. A transvaginal approach to repair of apical and other associated sites of pelvic organ prolapse with uterosacral ligaments. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183:1365-73. doi: 10.1067/mob.2000.110910
- DeLancey JO. Structural anatomy of the posterior pelvic compartment as it relates to rectocele. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180:815-23. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70652-6
- Shorvon PJ, McHugh S, Diamant NE, et al. Defecography in normal volunteers: results and implications. Gut. 1989;30:1737-49. doi: 10.1136/gut.30.12.1737
- Achtari C, Dwyer PL. Sexual function and pelvic floor disorders. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;19:993-1008. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2005.08.012
- Milani R, Salvatore S, Soligo M, et al. Functional and anatomical outcome of anterior and posterior vaginal prolapsed repair with prolene mesh. BJOG. 2005;112:107-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00332.x
- Dwyer PL, O’Reilly BA. Transvaginal repair of anterior and posterior compartment prolapse with Atrium polypropylene mesh. BJOG. 2004;111:831-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00194.x
- Nieminen K, Hiltunen KM, Laitinen J, et al. Transanal or vaginal approach to rectocele repair: a prospective, randomized pilot study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47:1636-42. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0656-2
- Hannestad YS, Rortveit G, Sandvik H, et al. A community-based epidemiological survey of female urinary incontinence: the Norwegian EPINCONT study. Epidemiology of Incontinence in the County of Nord-Trondelag. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53:1150-7. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(00)00232-8
- Ward K, Hilton P. Prospective multicentre randomized trial of tension-free vaginal tape and colposuspension as primary treatment for stress incontinence. BMJ. 2000;325:67-74. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7355.67
- Laurikainen E, Valpas A, Kivela A, et al. Retro pubic compared with transobturator tape placement in treatment of urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:4-11. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000249607.82768.a1
- Sideris M, McCaughey T, Hanrahan JG, et al. Risk of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) and anal incontinence: A meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020;252:303-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.06.048
- Harvey MA, Pierce M, Alter JE, et al.; Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. Obstetrical Anal Sphincter Injuries (OASIS): Prevention, Recognition, and Repair. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;37:1131-48. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30081-0
- Хрянин А.А., Тапильская Н.И., Кнорринг Г.Ю. Современные представления о папилломавирусной инфекции: эпидемиология и тактика ведения пациентов с аногенитальными бородавками. Клин. дерматология и венерология. 2020;19(5):719-28 [Khryanin AA, Tapilskaya NI, Knorring GY. Modern concepts of papillomavirus infection: epidemiology and tactics of management of patients with anogenital warts. Clinical dermatology and venereology. 2020;19(5):719-28 (in Russian)]. doi: 10.17116/klinderma202019051719
- Bulletti C, Coccia ME, Battistoni S, et al. Endometriosis and infertility. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2010;27(8):441-7. doi: 10.1007/s10815-010-9436-1
- Donnez J, Van Langendonckt A, Casanas-Roux F, et al. Current thinking on the pathogenesis of endometriosis. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2002;54:52-62. doi: 10.1159/000066295
- Nnoaham KE, Hummelshoj L, Webster P, et al. Impact of endometriosis on quality of life and work productivity: a multicenter study across ten countries. Fertil Steril. 2011;96(2):366-73.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.05.090
- Rafique S, Decherney AH. Medical Management of endometriosis. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2017;60(3):485-96. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000292
Supplementary files
