Meshless sacrocolpopexy for post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: vascularized flap technique. Case report. Video case**
- Authors: Kubin N.D.1, Shkarupa D.D.1, Basos A.S.1, Shulgin A.S.1, Labetov I.A.1, Shakhaliev R.A.1, Suchkov D.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- Saint Petersburg State University
- Issue: Vol 24, No 3 (2022)
- Pages: 229-232
- Section: CLINICAL CASE
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2079-5831/article/view/108422
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.26442/20795696.2022.3.201707
- ID: 108422
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The absence of rigid fixation point, tissue atrophy and multi-compartment defects make post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse a real challenge for the surgeon. The gold standard for treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse is sacrocolpopexy. Unfortunately, this approach does not allow to perform reliable long-term meshless reconstruction in the anterior and posterior compartments. Moreover, the use of a mesh is associated with the risk of erosion. Aim – to show the possibility of replacing a standard mesh with a vaginal flap during laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. A 60-year-old patient with post-hysterectomy prolapse stage III underwent meshless laparoscopic vaginal-assisted sacrocolpopexy. The duration of the surgery was 105 min (35 min vaginal part and 70 min LS part). Intraoperative blood loss was 55 ml. No intraoperative and early postoperative complications were recorded. According to the ultrasound postvoiding residual was 35 ml, hematomas in the operation area were not visualized. During the exam in 12 months after the surgery, no signs of POP (Aa -2 Ba -3 C -8 Ap -3 Bp -3 tvl 9 gh 4 pb 3), erosion and any pain were detected. The results of the questionnaires were as follows: PFDI-20 – 22,92, PISQ-12 – 31 and ICIQ-SF – 1. According to ultrasound the volume of residual urine was 0 ml. This approach allows to eliminate completely the risk of erosion and create a unified plastic natural construction from the vaginal cuff and tailored flap.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Nikita D. Kubin
Saint Petersburg State University
Email: nikitakubin@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5189-4639
D. Sci. (Med.)
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgDmitry D. Shkarupa
Saint Petersburg State University
Email: shkarupa.dmitry@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0489-3451
D. Sci. (Med.)
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgAlexander S. Basos
Saint Petersburg State University
Email: a.s.basos@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5020-9759
Cand. Sci. (Med.)
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgAndrei S. Shulgin
Saint Petersburg State University
Email: shulginandrey74@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8655-7234
Cand. Sci. (Med.)
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgIvan A. Labetov
Saint Petersburg State University
Email: ivanlabetov@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9813-7483
urologist
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgRustam A. Shakhaliev
Saint Petersburg State University
Author for correspondence.
Email: rustam.shahaliev@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2450-7044
obstetrician-gynecologist
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgDenis A. Suchkov
Saint Petersburg State University
Email: denis.urolog@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0649-9434
urologist
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgReferences
- Wright JD, Herzog TJ, Tsui J, et al. Nationwide trends in the performance of inpatient hysterectomy in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122(2 Pt 1):233-41. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318299a6cf
- Dällenbach P, Kaelin-Gambirasio I, Jacob S, et al. Incidence rate and risk factors for vaginal vault prolapse repair after hysterectomy. Int Urogynecol J. 2008;19(12):1623-9. doi: 10.1007/s00192-008-0718-4
- Coolen AWM, Bui BN, Dietz V, et al. The treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(12):1767-83. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3493-2
- Pacquée S, Nawapun K, Claerhout F, et al. Long-Term Assessment of a Prospective Cohort of Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;134(2):323-32. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003380
- Nygaard I, Brubaker L, Zyczynski HM, et al. Long-term outcomes following abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse. JAMA. 2013;309(19):2016-24. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.4919
- Takacs EB, Kreder KJ. Sacrocolpopexy: Surgical Technique, Outcomes, and Complications. Curr Urol Rep. 2016;17(12):90. doi: 10.1007/s11934-016-0643-x
- Athanasiou S, Zacharakis D, Protopapas A, et al. Severe pelvic organ prolapse. Is there a long-term cure? Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30(10):1697-703. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3775-3
- Tate SB, Blackwell L, Lorenz DJ, et al. Randomized trial of fascia lata and polypropylene mesh for abdominal sacrocolpopexy: 5-year follow-up. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22(2):137-43. doi: 10.1007/s00192-010-1249-3
Supplementary files
