Surgical Treatment of Children with Neurofibromatosis Type 1: a Case Series
- Authors: Sukhodolskaya O.V.1, Dorofeeva M.Y.2, Bochenkov S.V.2, Pivovarova A.M.2, Zabrodina A.R.2, Jivanshiryan G.V.2, Tarasova D.S.1, Ayrapetyan M.I.1,2, Morozov D.A.1,2
-
Affiliations:
- Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
- Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
- Issue: Vol 15, No 2 (2025)
- Pages: 181-192
- Section: Original Study Articles
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2219-4061/article/view/313000
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/psaic1844
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/TSLHBO
- ID: 313000
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Among hereditary diseases predisposing individuals to tumor development, neurofibromatosis type 1 ranks among the most prevalent. Due to the heterogeneity of clinical symptoms typical for this condition, patients often consult various specialists, which objectively leads to underestimation of symptoms and delayed diagnosis.
AIM: This study aimed to perform a comparative analysis of diagnostic approaches and surgical treatment in patients with this disease given the rarity of the disease and the lack of unified management protocols for neurofibromatosis type 1 in Russia to date.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data from 20 pediatric patients who underwent surgical treatment for neurofibromatosis type 1 at the Yu.E. Veltishchev Research Clinical Institute of Pediatrics and Pediatric Surgery.
RESULTS: Clinical records of 20 children (9 boys and 11 girls) were reviewed. The median age at the time of diagnosis was 7 years (1 to 17 years). In most patients (n = 15), neurofibromatosis type 1 manifestations were located in the head and neck region. The absence of a standardized diagnostic protocol for children with suspected neurofibromatosis was noted: magnetic resonance imaging of the affected area was performed in 19 patients, whereas brain magnetic resonance imaging and abdominal ultrasound were conducted in only one-third of the patients. In total, 36 surgeries were performed. The presence of a mass was the indication for surgery in 20 cases. In 3 patients with neurofibromas, initial histological diagnosis was incorrect, resulting in delayed diagnosis and inappropriate treatment strategies. Tumor recurrence was observed in 14 of the 26 cases following complete excision, which necessitated repeat surgical interventions (n = 9). A rare case of intestinal ganglioneurofibromatosis is also presented.
CONCLUSION: Variability in clinical manifestations, the rarity of the condition, and a general lack of awareness among pediatric surgeons often result in delayed diagnosis and inadequate treatment. Children were assessed and managed by various specialists without a systematic approach, and often underwent surgery without consideration of the pathogenesis of their condition. The creation of a clinical registry for such patients, as well as the establishment of multidisciplinary medical teams, with treatment decisions for children with neurofibromatosis type 1 made exclusively through case conferences, is of great importance.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Olga V. Sukhodolskaya
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
Author for correspondence.
Email: betti_olga99@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8868-4763
SPIN-code: 2881-3415
Russian Federation, Moscow
Marina Yu. Dorofeeva
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Email: mdorofeeva@inbox.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7879-315X
SPIN-code: 5156-1745
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)
Russian Federation, MoscowSergey V. Bochenkov
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Email: boch@pedklin.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7291-5459
SPIN-code: 6584-4201
Russian Federation, Moscow
Alexandra M. Pivovarova
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Email: ampivovarova@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7520-1072
SPIN-code: 2754-6879
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)
Russian Federation, MoscowAnna R. Zabrodina
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Email: zabrodina@pedklin.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4816-9369
SPIN-code: 8382-4911
Russian Federation, Moscow
Goar V. Jivanshiryan
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Email: Dzhivanshiryan.g@pedklin.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1105-9679
Russian Federation, Moscow
Daria S. Tarasova
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
Email: dtarasowa@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2387-8740
SPIN-code: 2175-3280
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)
Russian Federation, MoscowMaxim I. Ayrapetyan
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University; Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Email: Drairmaxim@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0348-929X
SPIN-code: 3683-7312
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine), Associate Professor
Russian Federation, Moscow; MoscowDmitry A. Morozov
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University; Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Email: damorozov@list.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1940-1395
SPIN-code: 8779-8960
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor
Russian Federation, Moscow; MoscowReferences
- Farschtschi S, Mautner V-F, Cecilia Lawson McLean A, et al. The neurofibromatoses. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2020;117:354–360. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2020.0354
- Garozzo D. Peripheral nerve tumors in neurofibromatosis 1: An overview on management and indications for surgical treatment in our experience. Neurology India. 2019;67(S1):S38–S44. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.250697
- Dogra BB, Rana KS. Facial plexiform neurofibromatosis: A surgical challenge. Indian Dermatol Online J. 2013;4(3):195–198. doi: 10.4103/2229-5178.115515
- Resolution of the Expert council on the problems of diagnosis and treatment of patients with plexiform neurofibromas. Russian Journal of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology. 2021;8(2):144–152. doi: 10.21682/2311-1267-2021-8-2-144-152 EDN: FAFYHA
- Blakeley JO, Plotkin SR. Therapeutic advances for the tumors associated with neurofibromatosis type 1, type 2, and schwannomatosis. Neuro Oncol. 2016;18(5):624–638. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nov200
- Prudner BC, Ball T, Rathore R, Hirbe AC. Diagnosis and management of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors: Current practice and future perspectives. Neurooncol Adv. 2020;2(S1):i40–i49. doi: 10.1093/noajnl/vdz047
- Hirbe AC, Gutmann DH. Neurofibromatosis type 1: a multidisciplinary approach to care. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13(8):834–843. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70063-8
- Legius E, Messiaen L, Wolkenstein P, et al. Revised diagnostic criteria for neurofibromatosis type 1 and Legius syndrome: an international consensus recommendation. Genet Med. 2021;23(8):1506–1513. doi: 10.1038/s41436-021-01170-5
- Bergqvist C, Servy A, Valeyrie-Allanore L, et al. Neurofibromatosis 1 French national guidelines based on an extensive literature review since 1966. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2020;15(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s13023-020-1310-3
- Mauro A, Zenzeri L, Esposito F, et al. Isolated intestinal Ganglioneuromatosis: case report and literature review. Ital J Pediatr. 2021;47(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s13052-021-01024-5
- Rabab’h O, Gharaibeh A, Al-Ramadan A, Ismail M, Shah J. Pharmacological approaches in neurofibromatosis type 1-associated nervous system tumors. Cancers. 2021;13(15):3880. doi: 10.3390/cancers13153880
- Bai R-Y, Esposito D, Tam AJ, et al. Feasibility of using NF1-GRD and AAV for gene replacement therapy in NF1-associated tumors. Gene Ther. 2019;26(6):277–286. doi: 10.1038/s41434-019-0080-9
- Gross AM, Wolters PL, Dombi E, et al. Selumetinib in children with inoperable plexiform neurofibromas. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(15):1430–1442. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1912735
- Hsieh DT, Rohena LO, Talaver F, et al. Neurofibromatosis type 1 differential diagnoses. Medscape, 2022.
- Gerszten PC, Burton SA, Ozhasoglu C, et al. Radiosurgery for benign intradural spinal tumors. Neurosurgery. 2008;62(4):887–895. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000318174.28461.fc
- Friedrich RE, Schmelzle R, Hartmann M, et al. Resection of small plexiform neurofibromas in neurofibromatosis type 1 children. World J Surg Oncol. 2005;3(1):6. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-3-6
Supplementary files
