Synergism and antagonism in intestinal microbial communities in closed organized collectives
- Authors: Ermolaev A.V.1, Kaiumov K.A.1, Lyamin A.V.1, Gorbachev D.O.1
-
Affiliations:
- Samara State Medical University
- Issue: Vol 15, No 4 (2025)
- Pages: 770-774
- Section: SHORT COMMUNICATIONS
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2220-7619/article/view/352127
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.15789/2220-7619-SAA-17874
- ID: 352127
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Introduction. The gut microbiota represents the largest part of the entire human microbiome. The formation of a stable microbiota begins at childbirth, continuing to change during life influenced by various exogenous and hereditary factors. One of such external cues is presented by closed organized collectives, where different individuals, due to the common way of life and nutrition, undergo a restructuring of the intestinal microbial communities. In addition to microbiota quantitative and qualitative changes, inter-microbial communities may also be altered (synergism, antagonism, mutualism). The aim of the study was to analyze the synergistic and antagonistic relationships between intestinal microbial communities in individuals from closed organized collectives.
Materials and methods. The study group included 120 male subjects aged 18 to 22 years, who lived within the same closed organized collectives for 9 months. Fecal samples were selected for plating prior to living in closed organized collectives (stage 1), and 9 months afterwards (stage 2). The identified microorganisms were assigned to the permanent, supplementary, or random microbiota group. To assess the relationship between pairs of genera, the Jaccard index was calculated.
Results. The results of the study showed that the synergistic relationships between members of the permanent microbiota remain stable or increase over time, which generally corresponds to the data on the properties of the obligate microbiota. Positive synergistic relationships with additional microbiota have also been identified, e.g., between Bifidobacterium spp. and the order of Lactobacillales. The synergy of these genera can effectively support normal gastrointestinal tract functioning. However, antagonistic relationships were also noted, especially between some representatives of the additional and permanent microbiota, such as Klebsiella spp. Such data may indicate a negative effect of certain microorganisms on the intestinal microbiota in a limited collective setting.
Conclusion. Further research in this field may help explain changes in microbial communities in organized collectives and develop strategies for healthy microbiota maintenance therein.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
A. V. Ermolaev
Samara State Medical University
Email: k.a.kayumov@samsmu.ru
Assistant Professor, Department of General Hygiene
Russian Federation, SamaraK. A. Kaiumov
Samara State Medical University
Author for correspondence.
Email: k.a.kayumov@samsmu.ru
Specialist of the Research and Educational Professional Center for Genetic and Laboratory Technologies
Russian Federation, SamaraA. V. Lyamin
Samara State Medical University
Email: k.a.kayumov@samsmu.ru
DSc (Medicine), Associate Professor, Director of the Research and Educational Professional Center for Genetic and Laboratory Technologies
Russian Federation, SamaraD. O. Gorbachev
Samara State Medical University
Email: k.a.kayumov@samsmu.ru
DSc (Medicine), Associate Professor, Head of the Department of General Hygiene
Russian Federation, SamaraReferences
- Андреева И.В., Стецюк О.У. Эффективность и безопасность комбинации Lactobacillus acidophilus La-5 и Bifidobacterium lactis Вb-12 в гастроэнтерологии, педиатрии и аллергологии // Клиническая микробиология и антимикробная химиотерапия. 2016. Т. 18, № 2. С. 113–124. [Andreeva I.V., Stetsiouk O.U. Efficacy and Safety of Lactobacillus acidophilus LA5 and Bifidobacterium lactis BB12 Combination in Gastroenterology, Pediatrics and Allergology. Klinicheskaya mikrobiologiya i antimikrobnaya khimioterapiya = Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2016, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 113–124. (In Russ.)]
- Бекпергенова А.В., Хлопко Ю.А., Иванова Е.В., Перунова Н.Б. Формирование ассоциаций облигатно-анаэробных бактерий толстого кишечника человека // Вестник Оренбургского государственного университета. 2017. Т. 9, № 209. С. 51–56. [Bekpergenova A.V., Khlopko Yu.A., Ivanova E.V., Perunova N.B. Formation of associations of obligate anaerobic bacteria of the human large intestine. Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Bulletin of the Orenburg State University, 2017, vol. 9, no. 209, pp. 51–56. (In Russ.)]
- Немченко У.М., Савелькаева М.В., Ракова Е.Б., Иванова Е.И., Сердюк Л.В. Микроэкологическая характеристика кишечного биоценоза у детей с функциональными нарушениями желудочно-кишечного тракта // Клиническая лабораторная диагностика. 2016. Т. 61, № 6. С. 368–371. [Nemtchenko U.M., Savelkaieva M.V., Rakova E.B., Ivanova E.I., Serdyuk L.V. The microecological characteristic of intestinal biocenosis of children with functional disorders of gastrointestinal tract. Klinicheskaya laboratornaya diagnostika = Russian Clinical Laboratory Diagnostics, 2016, vol. 61, no 6, pp. 368–371. (In Russ.)] doi: 10.18821/0869-2084-2016-61-6-368-371
- Bibbò S., Ianiro G., Giorgio V., Scaldaferri F., Masucci L., Gasbarrini A., Cammarota G. The role of diet on gut microbiota composition. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci., 2016, vol. 20, no. 22, pp. 4742–4749.
- Fan L., Xia Y., Wang Y., Han D., Liu Y., Li J., Fu J., Wang L., Gan Z., Liu B., Fu J., Zhu C., Wu Z., Zhao J., Han H., Wu H., He Y., Tang Y., Zhang Q., Wang Y., Zhang F., Zong X., Yin J., Zhou X., Yang X., Wang J., Yin Y., Ren W. Gut microbiota bridges dietary nutrients and host immunity. Sci. China Life Sci., 2023, vol. 66, no. 11, pp. 2466–2514. doi: 10.1007/s11427-023-2346-1
- Jung Y., Tagele S.B., Son H., Ibal J.C., Kerfahi D., Yun H., Lee B., Park C.Y., Kim E.S., Kim S.J., Shin J.H. Modulation of Gut Microbiota in Korean Navy Trainees following a Healthy Lifestyle Change. Microorganisms, 2020, vol. 8, no. 9: 1265. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8091265
- Nava G.M., Stappenbeck T.S. Diversity of the autochthonous colonic microbiota. Gut Microbes, 2011, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 99–104. doi: 10.4161/gmic.2.2.15416
- Valdes A.M., Walter J., Segal E., Spector T.D. Role of the gut microbiota in nutrition and health. BMJ, 2018, vol. 361: k2179. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k2179
- Valles-Colomer M., Blanco-Míguez A., Manghi P., Asnicar F., Dubois L., Golzato D., Armanini F., Cumbo F., Huang K.D., Manara S., Masetti G., Pinto F., Piperni E., Punčochář M., Ricci L., Zolfo M., Farrant O., Goncalves A., Selma-Royo M., Binetti A.G., Becerra J.E., Han B., Lusingu J., Amuasi J., Amoroso L., Visconti A., Steves C.M., Falchi M., Filosi M., Tett A., Last A., Xu Q., Qin N., Qin H., May J., Eibach D., Corrias M.V., Ponzoni M., Pasolli E., Spector T.D., Domenici E., Collado M.C., Segata N. The person-to-person transmission landscape of the gut and oral microbiomes. Nature, 2023, vol. 614, no. 7946, pp. 125–135. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05620-1
- Van Hul M., Cani P.D., Petitfils C., De Vos W.M., Tilg H., El-Omar E.M. What defines a healthy gut microbiome? Gut, 2024, vol. 73, no. 11, pp. 1893–1908. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2024-333378
- Vos M. Accessory microbiomes. Microbiology (Reading), 2023, vol. 169, no. 5: 001332. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.001332
- Zechner E.L., Kienesberger S. Microbiota-derived small molecule genotoxins: host interactions and ecological impact in the gut ecosystem. Gut Microbes, 2024, vol. 16, no. 1: 2430423. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2024.2430423
- Zhang Y., Tan P., Zhao Y., Ma X. Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli: intestinal pathogenesis mechanisms and colonization resistance by gut microbiota. Gut Microbes, 2022, vol. 14, no. 1: 2055943. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2022.2055943
Supplementary files


