Transcaucasus as a participant in the Soviet federal construction (historical and state studies analysis)
- Authors: Akzhigitov R.R.1
-
Affiliations:
- Penza State University
- Issue: No 2 (2025)
- Pages: 3-13
- Section: THEORETICAL AND HISTORICAL LEGAL SCIENCES
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2307-9525/article/view/301147
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.21685/2307-9525-2025-13-2-1
- ID: 301147
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Background. The study of the formation of a federal state in our Fatherland has always been and will remain relevant, which is associated not only with the patriotic focus of the problem, but also with its high academic value in the context of political science. The purpose of this publication is to show the complex ethnic composition of Transcaucasia, its socio-political characteristics, which predetermined the construction of the Transcaucasian Federation after the end of the Civil War. Materials and methods. The article uses historical and historical-political studies, as well as materials from the Twelfth Congress of the RCP(b) when considering acute domestic policy. The author resorts to diachronic and synchronous comparison, geopolitical analysis. Results. The article recalls that the Russian Empire tried to govern Transcaucasia as a single territory, and after the February and October revolutions of 1917, local leading ethnic groups were quite reluctant to separatize. Relations. The famous compromise between them was the Transcaucasian Democratic Federative Republic, which existed for just over a month. The Turkish aggression against Transcaucasia in the spring of 1918 provoked the creation of independent Georgia, Azerbaijan and Armenia, whose bourgeois regimes fell in 1920-1921. Moreover, since the end of 1920, the Bolshevik leadership was thinking about uniting the three republics, which was implemented in March 1922. However, the unification that took place caused sharp rejection on the part of the Georgian national communists. I.V. Stalin in his report at the XII Congress of the RCP(b) formulated the main reasons for such national-separatist behavior, rooted in national chauvinism, geopolitical and economic egoism. Conclusions. The "Georgian affair" quite clearly characterizes the peculiarity of the Soviet federal project, which was formed from above, in a centralized manner. The construction of the Transcaucasian Federation, which the Bolshevik leadership insisted on, lasted until 1936 and turned out to be a temporary but necessary measure at that stage of federalization. It helped to a certain extent to smooth out territorial and other contradictions between the republics and reduce the intensity of nationalist ambitions.
About the authors
Rinat R. Akzhigitov
Penza State University
Author for correspondence.
Email: makwwwin@yandex.ru
Postgraduate student
40 Krasnaya street, Penza, 440026References
- Gulyakov A.D. Federalizm: vozniknovenie i osnovnye napravleniya razvitiya (istorikogosudarstvovedcheskoe issledovanie): monografiya = Federalism: origin and main directions of development (historical and political studies research): monograph. Moscow: RIOR, 2019:388. (In Russ.). doi: 10.29039/02016-6
- Vardan'yan E.G. The Russian Empire, the USSR and the national question in Transcaucasia: problems and discussions. Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya = Theory and practice of social development. 2013;(11):270–276. (In Russ.)
- Dameshek I.L. Management of the outskirts in the documents of Russian archives: the problem of access to materials. Arkhivy i upravlenie Vostochnoy Sibir'yu: teoriya i praktika, proshloe, nastoyashchee, budushchee: sb.tr. mezhregion. nauch.-prakt. konf. (g. Irkutsk, 27 sentyabrya 2004 g.) = Archives and management of Eastern Siberia: theory and practice, past, present, future: proceedings of interregional scientific-practical conference (Irkutsk, September 27, 2004). Irkutsk: Izdatel'stvo Ottisk. 2004:50–56. (In Russ.)
- Gachechiladze R. Conflictogenicity of the collapse and restoration of the empire: a politicalgeographical approach (using the example of the former Russian Transcaucasia 1917–1923). Kavkaz i globalizatsiya = The Caucasus and globalization. 2012;6(3):160–174. (In Russ.)
- Gulyakov A.D., Salomatin A.Yu. Participation in the federalization of Transcaucasia, the North Caucasus, the Don and Kuban in post-autocratic Russia (historical and political science analysis). Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. Povolzhskiy region. Obshchestvennye nauki = University proceedings. Volga Region. Social Sciences. 2024;(3):81–92. (In Russ.). doi: 10.21685/2072-3016-2024-3-7
- Mirzekhanov V.S., Lannik L.V. The Batumi subsystem as a space of Ottoman hegemony in Transcaucasia in 1918: towards a formulation of the question. Novaya i noveyshaya istoriya = Modern and contemporary history. 2021;(3):5–22. (In Russ.). doi: 10.31857/S013038640014691-8
- Gatagova L.S. The Republics of the South Caucasus on the Path to a “Socialist Federation” (1917–1922). Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 25. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya i mirovaya politika = Moscow University Bulletin. Series 25. International relations and world politics. 2022;14(3):195–226. (In Russ.). doi: 10.48015/2076-7404-2022-14-3-195-226
- Saparov A. The Civil War in Transcaucasia 1918–1921 from the point of view of social, ethnic and political processes. Peterburgskiy istoricheskiy zhurnal = Petersburg historical journal. 2018;(3):224–253. (In Russ.). doi: 10.51255/2311-603X-2018-00060
- Tamazov M.S., Pazov I.S. Germany and the formation of independent Georgia in 1918. Nauchnyy dialog = Scientific dialogue. 2016;(4):229–240. (In Russ.)
- Gasanly D. Azerbaijan at the crossroads of eras: the first attempt to integrate into the free world (1917–1920). Kavkaz i globalizatsiya = The Caucasus and globalization. 2009;3(4):140–161. (In Russ.)
- Velichko L.N., Ambartsumyan K.R. The Armenian-Georgian territorial question and the peculiarities of national-state construction in Transcaucasia (1918). Gumanitarnye i yuridicheskie issledovaniya = Humanitarian and legal studies. 2019;(4):26–32. (In Russ.). doi: 10.37494/2409-1030-2019-4-26-32
- Melkonyan A.A., Khachatryan K.G., Kryuchkov I.V. Problems of Soviet national-state construction (historical and critical analysis using the example of Armenia). Oriental Studies. 2023;16(2):340–352. (In Russ.). doi: 10.22162/2619-0990-2023-66-2-340-352
- Ambartsumyan K.R. “We need Georgia as a temporary barrier”: international factors of the Bolshevik Sovietization of the South Caucasus (1920–1921). Novyy istoricheskiy vestnik = New historical bulletin. 2019;(1):88–105. (In Russ.). doi: 10.24411/2072-9286-2019-00006
- Karr E.Kh. Istoriya Sovetskoy Rossii: v 14 t. Kn. 1, t. 1–2: Bol'shevistskaya revolyutsiya 1917–1923. Per. s angl., avt. vstup. sl. k rus. izd. A. P. Nenarokov = Bolshevik Revolution 1917–1923. Translated from English, author’s introduction to Russian edition by A. P. Nenarokov. Moscow: Progress, 1990:763. (In Russ.)
- Azizbekova P.A. V.I. Lenin i sotsialisticheskie preobrazovaniya v Azerbaydzhane. (1920–1923 gg.) = Lenin and socialist transformations in Azerbaijan (1920–1923). Moscow: Izd-vo Akad. nauk SSSR, 1962:366. (In Russ.)
- Grosul V.Ya. Obrazovanie SSSR (1917–1924 gg.) = Formation of the USSR. Moscow: ITRK, 2007:215. (In Russ.)
- Smith J. Georgian Affair of 1922 Policy Failure, personality clash or power struggle? Europe-Asia Studies. 1988;50(3):519–544.
- Lenin V.I. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy. V 55 t. = Complete Works. In 55 volumes. Moscow: Gospolitizdat, 1958–1965. (In Russ.)
- Lebskiy M. The mysterious death of the Transcaucasian Federation (1922–1936). Svobodnaya mysl' = Free thought. 2024;(6):161–181. (In Russ.)
- Amanzholova D.A. The Soviet federal project and conflicts of nation-building in the 1920s–1930s. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Istoriya Rossii = Bulletin of Peoples' Friendship University of Russia. Series: History of Russia. 2024;23(1):30–40. (In Russ.). doi: 10.22363/2312-8674-2024- 23-1-30-40
Supplementary files
