The image of Neoptolemus in the genealogy of the Molossian Aeacidae
- Authors: Kazarov S.S.1
-
Affiliations:
- South Federal University
- Issue: Vol 13, No 2 (2024)
- Pages: 107-110
- Section: Historical Sciences
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2309-4370/article/view/271347
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.55355/snv2024132203
- ID: 271347
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Some regions of Ancient Hellas, located on the border of the barbarian and Greek worlds and lagging behind in political and cultural terms, sought to prove their «Greek» origin in one way or another. This was especially true of the royal dynasties, which, deriving their genealogy from mythical heroes, thereby substantiated their claims to Greek origin. A similar example is the Molossian dynasty of the Aeacids, ruling in Epirus, which traced its origins to the mythical hero Neoptolemus, son of Achilles. This happened at a time when Epirus and the ruling dynasty emerged from the historical shadows and began to participate more actively in pan-Greek affairs. The main source for this was the stories from the Trojan War, telling of the return of the heroes after the defeat of Troy. Often, representatives of the royal dynasty were given the names of mythical heroes at birth, which was supposed to serve as confirmation of their high origin. Over time, the genealogy of the Molossian kings was supplemented and expanded by introducing new mythological persons. During the reign of King Pyrrhus, his wife Lanassa was included in the heroic genealogy of the Molossian kings. The name Neoptolemus was also borne by two real persons in Epirus history, but their fates were not happy.
Keywords
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Sarkis Surenovich Kazarov
South Federal University
Author for correspondence.
Email: ser-kazarov@yandex.ru
Doctor of Historical Sciences, professor of the Archeology and Ancient History Department
Russian Federation, Rostov-on-DonReferences
- Malkin I. The Returns of Odysseus. Berkley: University of California Press, 1998. 331 p.
- Kittela S.-I. Dodona and Neoptolemus: Heroic Genealogies and Claims of Ethnicity // Studies of Ancient Oracles and Divination / ed. by M. Kajava. Roma, 2013. P. 29–47.
- Robertson D.S. Euripides and Tharyps // The Classical Review. 1923. Vol. 37, iss. 3–4. P. 58–60. doi: 10.1017/s0009840x00041536.
- Hammond N.G.L. Epirus. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1967. 847 p.
- Cross G.N. Epirus: a Study in Greek Constitutional Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1932. 137 p. doi: 10.1017/s0017383500002102.
- Sandberger F. Prosopographie zur Geschichte des Pyrrhos. Munchen: Inaugural-Dissertation, 1970. 216 s.
- Cabouret B. La religion des Grecs // De Zeus a Allah. Les Grandes Religions du Monde Mediterraneen. Nantes: Du Temps, 2004. P. 13–52.
- Nilsson M.P. Studien zur Geschichte des alten Epeiros. Lund: Lunds Universitets Arksskrift, 1909. 77 s.
- Schubert R. Geschichte des Pyrrhus. Konigsberg: Verlag von W. Koch, 1894. 288 s.
- Fragmenta historicorum Graecorum / ed. C. Muller. Bd. III. Paris: Ambrosio Firmin Didot, 1849. 729 p.
- Hüttner U. Die politische Rolle des Heraklesgestalt in Griechischen Herrschertums. Stuttgart: F. Steiner, 1997. 385 s.
- Franke P.R. Alt-Epirus und das Konigtum der Molosser. Kallmunz: Michael Lassleben, 1955. 89 s.
- Казаров С.С. Пирр, царь Эпира. М.: Проспект, 2023. 272 с.
Supplementary files
