Referential features of narrative genres in the process of language acquisition

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The paper regards the process of the development of several features of the narrative speech genre in the discourse field of Russian culture while learning Russian as a second language. Referentiality in general linguistic sense is an area concerning naming of objects and characters by language means. In this paper we analyse the problems of the referential choice (what factors influence the speaker’s choice of a referential expression) and anaphora resolution (how the listener/reader binds an anaphoric pronoun to a coreferential noun phrase). The main goal of our paper is to study referential features of narratives produced by foreign students acquiring Russian as a second language (RSL), compared with adult Russian speakers and children acquiring Russian as a first language (RFL). Also, we describe referential mistakes made by RSL learners. The analysis of the data demonstrates that the main referential features (abilities to make the right referential choices, form anaphoric chains, etc.) are related to the age-specific cognitive development and do not depend on the native language. Both groups of adults show similar patterns in using nouns and pronouns for the introduction or reintroduction of a referent and for the topic maintenance, and build continuous anaphoric chains. Particular anaphoric mistakes of RSL learners are related to the level of their grammar skills and differ from the mistakes made by RFL children: while children’s mistakes base on the cognitive factor, RSL students’ mistakes are mostly grammatical.

About the authors

Elena V. Galkina

Pavlov Institute of Physiology Russian Academy of Sciences

ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5041-2498
St. Petersburg, Tiflisskaya street, 3

Sofia V. Krasnoshchekova

Institute for Linguistic Studies Russian Academy of Science; Peter the Great St. Petersburg Politechnic University

ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8830-5121
Scopus Author ID: 57190568433
ResearcherId: AAR-6848-2021
9 Tuchkov Per., Saint Petersburg 199053, Russia

Elena Valerievna Kozhevnikova

Pavlov Institute of Physiology Russian Academy of Sciences

ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0941-7676
St. Petersburg, Tiflisskaya street, 3

References

  1. Aksu-Koç A., Nicolopoulou A. Character reference in young children’s narratives: A crosslinguistic comparison of English, Greek, and Turkish // Lingua. 2015. № 155. P. 62–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2014.04.006
  2. Allen S., Hughes M. E., Skarabela B. The role of cognitive accessibility inchildren’s referential choice // The Acquisition of Reference. Amsterdam : John Benjamins, 2015. P. 123–154. https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.15.06all
  3. Banfield A. Narrative style and the grammar of direct and indirect speech // Foundations of Language. 1973. Vol. X. P. 1–39.
  4. Flavell J. H. Theory-of-mind development Retrospect and prospect // Merrill-Palmer Quartely. 2004. Vol. 50, № 3. P. 274–290.
  5. Gagarina N., Klop D., Kunnari S., Tantele K., Välimaa T., Balčiūnienė I., Bohnacker U., Walters J. Assessment of Narrative Abilities in Bilingual Children // Assessing Multilingual Children. Disentangling Bilingualism from Language Impairment. Bristol, Buffalo, Toronto, Multilingual Matters., 2015. P. 243–276. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783093137
  6. Givon T. (ed). Conversation. Cognitive, Communicative and Social Perspectives. Typological Studies in Language. Amsterdam, Philadelphia, John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1997. 302 p.
  7. Gruening A. Referential Choice and Activation Factors: A Neural Network Approach // Proceedings of the 4th Discourse anaphora and anaphor resolution colloquium. Lisbon, Edições Colibri, 2002. P. 81–86.
  8. Haude K., Witzlack-Makarevich A. Referential hierarchies and alignment: An overview // Linguistics. 2016. Vol. 54, № 3. P. 433–441. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2016-0008
  9. Lindgren J., Vogels J. Referential cohesion in Swedish preschool children’s narratives // Journal of Pragmatics. 2018. № 133. P. 45–62. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.pragma.2018.06.007
  10. Pine J. M. The functional basis of referentiality: Evidence from children’s spontaneous speech // First Language. 1992. № 12. P. 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/014272379201203403
  11. Prince G. A Dictionary of Narratology. Nebraska : University of Nebraska Press, 2003. 126 p.
  12. Slabakova R., White L. Brambatti Guzzo N. Pronoun Interpretation in the Second Language: Effects of Computational Complexity // Frontiers in Psychology. 2017. № 8. P. 12–36. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01236
  13. Бахтин М. М. Проблема речевых жанров. Эстетика словесного творчества. М. : Искусство, 1979. 445 с.
  14. Бергельсон М. Б. Социокультурная мотивированность нарративов. URL: https://www.dialog-21.ru/dialog2007/materials/html/06.htm (дата обращения: 24.07.2021).
  15. Гайда С. Жанры разговорных высказываний // Жанры речи. 1999. № 2. С. 103–111.
  16. Дементьев В. В. Непрямая коммуникация и ее жанры. Саратов : Изд-во Сарат. ун-та, 2000. 248 с.
  17. Косицкая Ф. Л. Речевой жанр как единица контрастивного анализа // Вестник ТГПУ. 2006. № 4 (55). С. 101–105.
  18. Николаева Т. М. Лингвистика текста: современное состояние и перспективы // Новое в зарубежной лингвистике. М. : Прогресс, 1978. Вып. VIII. С. 5–39.
  19. Николаева Т. М. От звука к тексту. М. : Языки русской культуры, 2000. 680 с.
  20. Онипенко Н. К. Грамматика текста в онтолингвистическом аспекте // Известия РГПУ им. А. И. Герцена. 2018. № 189. С. 169–178.
  21. Падучева Е. В. Семантические исследования. Семантика времени и вида в русском языке. Семантика нарратива. М. : Языки русской культуры, 1996. 479 с.
  22. Прокопеня В. К. Механизмы анафоры при речепорождении и речепонимании: экспериментальное исследование на материале русского языка: автореф. дис. … канд. филол. наук. СПб., 2016. 27 с.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2024 Галкина Е.V., Краснощекова С.V., Кожевникова Е.V.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).