TEXT AS PALIMPSEST: ANTHOLOGY OF TRACES AND POETICS OF THE INVISIBLE IN ANSELM KIEFER’S ART
- Authors: Sakhno I.M.1
-
Affiliations:
- National Research University Higher School of Economics
- Issue: No 3 (2022)
- Pages: 53-72
- Section: ARTICLES
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2312-7899/article/view/269536
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.23951/2312-7899-2022-3-53-72
- ID: 269536
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The article examines the theoretical issue of the palimpsest by looking at the art of the German neo-Expressionist painter Anselm Kiefer. In the context of semiotics and cultural semantics, the palimpsest is a new text written over the erased previous version, with the old meaning shining through the new. In an attempt to provide a semantic description of the palimpsest, the author finds crucial tools for its study in the notions of the stratification and intensity of the palimpsest as a multi-layered hybrid text, in which the logical structure of the text forms the basis for convergence of various microtextures and authorial utterances. Palimpsest texts have a certain narrativity of their own: it turns the reader or viewer towards finding textual references and quotes, searching for traces of the invisible and accounting for other existing discourses – thus revealing links between text and subtext, the visible and the invisible, form and content. The textual space of the palimpsest moves along a certain trajectory and features a certain kind of anaphora, as a combination of semantic constructs which differ in their level and structure. The author sees the palimpsest both as a research method which harks back to hermeneutics and to interpreting traces of past culture. At the same time, the palimpsest remains an artistic device. The narrative logic mandates removing layers of superimposed texts, one by one in a fixed order. The article focuses on studying such tropes as “trace”, “labyrinth”, or intertext. In the study of visuality in the palimpsest texts by Anselm Kiefer, the author emphasizes the morphology of artistic texts and shows how the verbal context can be interpreted on various structural levels, and how allusions and reminiscences can be discovered in the depths of the text, and the topoi of cultural memory can be marked. In the analysis of Anselm Kiefer’s Varus (1976) and Margarete (1981), the author concludes that, throughout the many decades of his work, Kiefer polemically assaults the nationalist rhetoric. He deals with important historical events and topoi of the traditional German mythology, trying to find true examples of heroic past and reconstruct the historical truth. Textual layers, seen as multiple borrowings, allusions and reminiscences, open the door into a new space of visual optics and interpretation zones. The mythologem of the palimpsest is closely linked to the narrative and its features, where textual references and direct quotes reveal new connections, which previously remained invisible.
About the authors
Irina Mikhailovna Sakhno
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Email: irinasachno@mail.ru
12 Malaya Pionerskaya St., Moscow, Russia
References
- Барт 1994 – Барт Р. От произведения к тексту // Барт Р. Избранные работы. Семиотика. Поэтика. М.: Прогресс, 1994.
- Барт 2020 – Барт Р. Сай Твомбли. М.: Ад Маргинем Пресс, Музей современного искусства «Гараж», 2020.
- Греймас 2004 – Греймас А.-Ж. Структурная семантика: поиск метода / Пер. с фр. Л. Зиминой. М.: Академический проект, 2004.
- Деррида 2000 – Деррида Ж. О грамматологии / пер. с франц., вступит ст. и коммент. Н. С. Автономовой. М.: Ad Marginem,2000.
- Деррида 2013 – Деррида Ж. Голос и феномен и другие работы по теории знака. СПб.: Алетейя, 2013.
- Дюв де Т. 2014 – Дюв де Т. Именем искусства. К археологии современности / пер. с фр. А. Шестакова. М.: Изд. дом Высшей школы экономики, 2014.
- Женетт 1982 – Женетт Ж. Палимпсесты: литература второй степени. М.: Наука,1982.
- Женетт 1998 – Женетт Ж. Пруст-палимпсест // Фигуры: в 2 т. / пер. с франц. Е. Васильевой и др. М.: Изд-во им. Сабашниковых, 1998. Т. 1. С. 51–63.
- Кристева 2013 – Кристева Ю. Семиотика: исследования по семанализу / пер.с фр. Э. А. Орловой. М.: Академический проект, 2013.
- Колязин 2019 – Колязин В. Ф. Цикл «Нибелунги» Ансельма Кифера – диалог с символами истории // Художественная культура. 2019. Т. 2, № 3 (30). С. 312–325.
- Марьон 2010 – Марьон Ж.-Л. Перекрестья видимого. М.: Прогресс-Традиция, 2010.
- Парфёнов 2013 – Парфёнов В. Н. Вернул ли Вар легионы? Юбилей битвы в Тевтобургском лесу и раскопки в Калькризе // Мнемон. Исследования и публикации по истории античного мира. СПб. ,2013. Вып. 12. С. 395–412.
- Фуко 2003 – Фуко М. Ницше, генеалогия, история // Ницше и современная западная мысль / под ред. В. Каплуна. СПб.: Летний сад, 2003.
- Целан 2013 – Целан П. Стихотворения. Проза. Письма / под общ. ред. М. Белорусца. М.: Ад Маргинем Пресс, 2013.
- Эко 2020 – Эко У. О зеркалах и другие истории. Реалистическая иллюзия. М.: Слово / Slovo, 2020. Кн. 1.
- Biro 2003 – Biro M. Representation and Event: Anselm Kiefer, Joseph Beuys, and the Memory of the Holocaust // The Yale Journal of Criticism. 2003. Vol. 16 (1). Р. 113–146.
- Binder 1997 – Binder A. Die Meister aus Deutschland. Zu Paul Celans Todesfuge // Germanica. 21 Von Celan bis Grünbein. Zur Situation der deutschen Lyrik im ausgehenden zwanzigsten. Jahrhundert,1997. S. 51–71.
- Gilmour 1990 – Gilmour J. C. Fire on the Earth: Anselm Kiefer and the Postmodern World. Philadelphia: Temple University Press,1990.
- Kiefer 2010 – Kiefer A. Die Kunst geht knapp nicht unter: Anselm Kiefer im Gespräch mit Klaus Dermutz. Berlin: Suhrkamp Verlag AG, 2010.
- Meier 1992 – Meier C. Anselm Kiefer. Die Rückkehr des Mythos in der Kunst: Dis. Essen: Verlag Die Blaue Eule,1992.
- Sauer 2012 – Sauer M. Zur Bilderfahrung mit den Werken Anselm Kiefers // Zur Handlungsrelevanz ästhetischer Erfahrung anhand Anselm Kiefers Deutschlandbilder. Bühl / Baden, 2012. S. 29–41.
- Schütz 1998 – Schütz S. Anselm Kiefer. Geschichte als Material. Arbeiten 1969–1983: Dis. Aachen, 1998. Köln, 1999.
- Fokkema 1984 – Fokkema D. Literary History. Modernism and Postmodernism. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamen Public Company,1984.
Supplementary files

