SCIENCE AS A COGNITIVE-SEMIOTIC PROCESS IN THE OPTICS OF THE THINKING-TOGETHER-WITH-COMPLEXITY PARADIGM
- Authors: Arshinov V.I.1
-
Affiliations:
- Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences
- Issue: No 2 (2023)
- Pages: 81-94
- Section: BOUNDARY VISUALIZATION INDICATORS IN THE ‘STRUCTURE’ OF SCIENCE
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2312-7899/article/view/270265
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.23951/2312-7899-2023-2-81-94
- ID: 270265
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The article is an attempt to constructively comprehend what is meant by (or, what is hidden under) the umbrella term “science” (or scientificity) in the multiperspective optics of thinking-together-with-complexity. This way of thinking is understood as the search for coherence – an inner unity in the flow of the emerging chaotic variety of interactions between man and his natural and technogenic environment in the epoch of the Anthropocene and the emerging artificial intelligence. Not giving a strict definition of complexity, the article refers to a recently published Russian translation of the book by the French thinker Edgar Morin with an afterword by the translator (Yakov Svirsky) and the editor of this book (Vladimir Arshinov). In this connection, the following explanation is provided: thinking-together-with-complexity (the hyphen here is very important as a linking sign) is inter-disciplinary (and transdisciplinary) thinking that focuses exactly on the prefix inter, which has a fundamental meaning. It is recursive-procedural mediating thinking in the middle. The article emphasizes that this way of thinking – together-with-complexity (the complexity paradigm in Moren’s terminology) – is opposed to the simplicity paradigm not as a denial of the necessity (and inevitability) of simplification procedures, but as a thought-activating, linguo- semiotically mediated and conscious strategy of reducing complexity (as interpreted by Niklas Luhmann). It also implies a certain virtue ethics in the sense of Aristotle’s doctrine of middleness and the doctrine of choosing the middle path of Tao. The discussion goes back to Simondon’s understanding of the genesis of technicality as a phase shift in the primordial magical worldview, as applied to the co-evolutionary understanding of science and scientificity as a semiotic entanglement of linguistic-technological-scientificity; as a process of techno-mediated, recursive contact-bonding of man as an organ-like, bodily embodied universe with his reanimated complex environment of biospheric and, ultimately, cosmic habitat, which has generated him and is generated by him; and, of course, as the coevolutionary intertwining of natural-science and humanitarian knowledge and modes of cognition, eco-cognitive semiotic practices.
About the authors
Vladimir Ivanovich Arshinov
Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Email: varshinov@mail.ru
Ул. Гончарная, д. 12, стр. 1, Москва, 109240, Россия
References
- Беннетт 2018 – Беннетт Дж. Пульсирующая материя. Политическая экология вещей. Пермь : Гиле Пресс.
- Галисон 2004 – Галисон П. Зона обмена: координация убеждений и действий // Вопросы истории естествознания и техники. 2004. № 1. С. 64–91.
- Коллинз 2002 – Коллинз Р. Социология философий. Глобальная теория интеллектуального изменения. Новосибирск : Сибирский хронограф, 2002.
- Луман 2007 – Луман Н. Введение в системную теорию. М. : Логос, 2007.
- Лысенко 2004 – Лысенко В. Трудное дело «середины»: «срединность» (mesotes) Аристотеля и «срединный путь» (majjhima patipad) Будды // Сравнительная философия. М. : Вост. лит., 2004. Вып. 2. C. 182–199.
- Морен 2019 – МоренЭ. О сложностности. М. : Ин-т общегуманитарных исследований, 2019.
- Полани 1985 – Полани М. Личностное знание. М. : Прогресс, 1985.
- Попков 2022 – Попков В. Математика сознания. Глубинные истоки мышления и «Законы формы» Дж. Спенсера-Брауна. М. : ЛЕНАНД, 2022.
- Пригожин, Стенгерс 2005 – Пригожин И., Стенгерс И. Порядок из хаоса: новый диалог человека с природой. М. : КомКнига, 2005.
- Симондон 2013 – Симондон Ж. Суть техничности // Синий диван. 2013. № 18. С. 93–114.
- Симондон 2022 – Симондон Ж. Индивид и его физико-биологический генезис. М. : Ин-т общегуманитарных исследований, 2022.
- Стенгерс 2021 – Стенгерс И. Восстанавливая анимизм // Неприкосновенный запас. Дебаты о политике и культуре. 2021. № 2 (136). С. 80–94.
- Barad 2007 – Barad K. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham : Duke University Press, 2007.
- Desmond 1995 – Desmond W. Being and the Between. Albany : State University of New York Press, 1995.
- Spencer-Brown 1969 – Spencer-Brown G. Laws of Form. London : Allen & Unwin, 1969.
Supplementary files

