Effectiveness of biological products for control of the most significant mycoses on potato crops
- Authors: Pakina E.N.1, Shkurkin S.I.2, Mukhina M.T.2
-
Affiliations:
- RUDN University
- Pryanishnikov Institute of Agrochemistry
- Issue: Vol 18, No 4 (2023): Pesticides. Looking to the future
- Pages: 501-507
- Section: Pesticides. Looking to the future
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2312-797X/article/view/315735
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-797X-2023-18-4-501-507
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/LDMWUJ
- ID: 315735
Cite item
Abstract
Experiments on comparative assessment of effectiveness of bioagents to control the most significant fungal diseases were carried out on crops of potato breeding line in the Zernograd district, Rostov region. Biofungicide Metabakterin, WP based on Methylobacterium extorquens NVD VKM B-2879D + Validamycin Streptomyces hygroscopicus subsp. limoneus VKPM AC-1966 + Bacillus subtilis VKPM B-2918 IPM 215 and biofungicide Vitaplan based on Bacillus subtilis , strain VKM-B-2604D + Bacillus subtilis , strain VKM-B-2605D were studied in the research. The results showed that Metabakterin, WP at the rate of 80 g/ha was the most effective for control of early blight, late blight, fusarium dry rot and rhizoctonia canker on potatoes, while protection period of the biofungicide against these fungal diseases ranged from 19 to 27 days. It was noted that application rate of 80 g/ha of Metabakterin, WP provided the maximum increase in potato yield.
About the authors
Elena N. Pakina
RUDN University
Email: e-pakina@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6493-6121
Doctor of Agricultural Sciences, Professor, Agrobiotechnological Department, Agrarian and Technological Institute
8/2 Miklukho-Maklaya st., Moscow, 117198, Russian FederationSergey I. Shkurkin
Pryanishnikov Institute of Agrochemistry
Email: elgen@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7123-4213
Candidate of Legal Sciences, Director
31a Pryanishnikova st., Moscow, 127434, Russian FederationMaria T. Mukhina
Pryanishnikov Institute of Agrochemistry
Author for correspondence.
Email: mtmasm@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0006-7901-6858
Candidate of Agricultural Sciences, Head of the Laboratory for Testing Elements of Agricultural Technologies, Agrochemicals and Pesticides
31a Pryanishnikova st., Moscow, 127434, Russian FederationReferences
- Zeiruk VN, Glez VM. Pre-sowing seed material preparation and planting of potatoes. Plant protection and quarantine. 2010;(2):61–63. (In Russ.).
- Osipov V, Zhevora S, Yanushkina N. Efficiency of potato production: analysis of variation and differentiation of regions of the Russian Federation. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2019;274:012060. doi: 10.1088/1755–1315/274/1/012060
- Hannibal PB. Species of the genus Alternaria found in Russia and in some neighboring territories. Mycology and Phytopathology. 2015;49(6):374–385. (In Russ.).
- Bradshaw NJ. Report of the fungicide sub-group: Discussion of potato early and late blight fungicides, their properties & characteristics and harmonised protocols for evaluating these. PPO-Special Report. 2007;(12):107–111.
- Elansky SN, Pobedinskaya MA, Kokaeva LY, Statsyuk NV, Alexandrova AV. Molecular identification of the species composition of Russian isolates of pathogens, causing early blight of potato and tomato. PPOSpecial Report. 2012;(15):151–156.
- Anisimov BV, Zebrin SN, Zeiruk VN. Dry and soft rot of tubers and their control in potato seed production. Plant protection and quarantine. 2017;(5):30–35. (In Russ.).
- Vlasenko NG, Bokina IG. Ecologization of plant protection in conditions of intensification. Chief Agronomist. 2018:(9):7–10. (In Russ.).
- Abbas MF, Naz F, Irshad G. Important fungal diseases of potato and their management — a brief review. Mycopath. 2013;11(1):45–50.
- Nadykta VD. main results of ARRIBPP’ research on biological plant protection. In: Biological plant protection — the basis for stabilization of agroecosystems: conference proceedings. Krasnodar; 2012. p.20–22. (In Russ.).
- Pavlyushin VA. Biologization of plant protection — a necessary condition for the development of crop production. Chief Agronomist. 2018;(7):6–9. (In Russ.).
- Cheremisin AI. The effectiveness of the use of protective equipment in cultivation of seed potatoes. In: Potato growing: conference proceedings. Minsk; 2007. p.379–384. (In Russ.).
- Khalaeva VI, Volchkevich IG, Sereda GM, Konopatskaya MV. Effectiveness of fungicides to protect potatoes against late blight. Plant protection. 2020;(44):115–124. (In Russ.).
- Özer G, Bayraktar H. Characterization and sensitivity to fungicides of Rhizoctonia spp. recovered from potato plants in Bolu, Turkey. Journal of Phytopathology. 2015;163(1):11–18. doi: 10.1111/jph.12275
- Widmark AK, Andersson B, Cassel-Lundhagen A, Sandström M, Yuen JE. Phytophthora infestans in a single field in southwest Sweden early in spring: symptoms, spatial distribution and genotypic variation. Plant Pathology. 2007;56(4):473–579. doi: 10.1111/j.1365‑3059.2007.01618.x
Supplementary files
