ICT competencies for educational managers developmented on the educational process: a systematic literature review

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Аннотация

Problem statement. The rapid advancement of information and communication technology (ICT) has transformed educational landscapes, necessitating effective leadership equipped with essential digital competencies. This research explores the ICT competencies educational managers require to successfully integrate technology into their institutions. This study aims to identify key competencies, explore barriers to ICT adoption, and highlight effective training practices through a systematic literature review of existing research. Methodology. Utilizing a comprehensive review methodology, relevant studies were analyzed to distil insights regarding educational leaders’ roles in facilitating technology integration. Results. The findings reveal that essential ICT competencies include technical proficiency, information literacy, and pedagogical knowledge, which empower educational managers to foster innovative instructional practices. The review also identifies significant barriers, such as insufficient training and resistance to change, which vary in impact across different contexts. Furthermore, effective training practices are emphasized, including tailored programs and ongoing support, which are essential for developing and sustaining these competencies. Conclusion. This research contributes to educational management by providing a framework for understanding the necessary ICT competencies for educational leaders. It underscores the importance of addressing barriers to adoption and promotes best practices in professional development. By equipping educational managers with the requisite skills, this study aims to enhance the overall quality of education and prepare students for success in a digital world.

Авторлар туралы

Moses Adeoye

Al-Hikmah University

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: princeadelekm@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0755-3532

PhD, Senior Lecturer, Department of Educational Management and Counselling

Adewole Estate, Adeta Road, Ilorin, Kwara State, 240241, Nigeria

Rasheedat Oladimeji

Al-Hikmah University

Email: rmoladimeji@alhikmah.edu.ng
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9294-740X

PhD, Senior Lecturer, Department of Educational Management and Counselling

Adewole Estate, Adeta Road, Ilorin, Kwara State, 240241, Nigeria

Adeseko Olaifa

Al-Hikmah University

Email: asolaifa@alhikmah.edu.ng
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3556-4872

PhD, Senior Lecturer, Department of Educational Management and Counselling

Adewole Estate, Adeta Road, Ilorin, Kwara State, 240241, Nigeria

Hammed Bolaji

Al-Hikmah University

Email: hobolaji@alhikmah.edu.ng
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3228-5066

PhD, Head of Department, Department of Science Education

Adewole Estate, Adeta Road, Ilorin, Kwara State, 240241, Nigeria

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Adeshina AE. The transformative role of digital resources in teaching and learning. Open Journal of Educational Development. 2024;5(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.52417/ojed.v5i1.520
  2. Khan N, Sarwar A, Chen TB, Khan Sh. Connecting digital literacy in higher education to the 21st-century workforce. Knowledge Management & E-Learning. 2022;14(1):46–61 https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2022.14.004
  3. Pettersson F. On the issues of digital competence in educational contexts – a review of literature. Education and information technologies. 2018;23(2):1005–1021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9649-3
  4. Dzhurylo AP, Shparyk OM. ICT competence for secondary school teachers and students in the context of education informatisation: global experience and challenges for Ukraine. Information Technologies and Learning Tools. 2019;70(2):43–58. https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v70i2.2438
  5. Blau I, Shamir-Inbal T. Digital competences and long-term ICT integration in school culture: the perspective of elementary school leaders. Education and Information Technologies. 2017; 22(3):769–787. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9456-7
  6. Abedi EA. Tensions between technology integration practices of teachers and ICT in education policy expectations: implications for change in teacher knowledge, beliefs and teaching practices. Journal of Computers in Education. 2024;11(4):1215–1234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-023-00296-6
  7. Thelma ChC, Sain ZH, Mpolomoka DL, Akpan WM, Davy M. Curriculum design for the digital age: strategies for effective technology integration in higher education. International Journal of Research. 2024;11(7):185–201. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.13123899
  8. Chew SW, Cheng I-L, Kinshuk, Chen NS. Exploring challenges faced by different stakeholders while implementing educational technology in classrooms through expert interviews. Journal of Computers in Education. 2018;5:175–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-018-0102-4
  9. Mousa M, Arslan Ah. To what extent does virtual learning promote the implementation of responsible management education? A study of management educators. The International Journal of Management Education. 2023;21(2):100772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100772
  10. Andrin GR, Kilag OK, Groenewald ES, Benitez J, Dagala FP, Ubay R. Borderless learning environments: impacts on educational management strategies. International Multidisciplinary Journal of Research for Innovation, Sustainability, and Excellence (IMJRISE). 2024;1(2):43–49. https://risejournals.org/index.php/imjrise/article/view/41
  11. Ibrahim F, Susanto H, Haghi PK, Setiana D. Shifting paradigm of education landscape in time of the COVID-19 pandemic: revealing of a digital education management information system. Applied System Innovation. 2020;3(4):49. https://doi.org/10.3390/asi3040049
  12. Sergeeva OV, Zheltukhina MR, Bikbulatova GI, Sokolova EG, Digtyar OYu, Prokopyev AI, Sizova ZM. Examination of the relationship between information and communication technology competencies and communication skills. Contemporary Educational Technology. 2023;15(4):483.
  13. Tristán-López A, Ylizaliturri-Salcedo MA. Evaluation of ICT competencies. In: Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology. New York: Springer; 2013. p. 323–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5-26
  14. Falloon G. From digital literacy to digital competence: the teacher digital competency (TDC) framework. Educational Technology Research and Development. 2020;68(5):2449–2472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09767-4
  15. Bolek V, Kokles M, Romanová A, Zelina M. Information literacy of managers: models and factors. Journal of Business Economics and Management. 2018;19(5):722–741. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2018.6906
  16. Ayeni OO, Al Hamad NM, Chisom ON, Osawaru B, Adewusi OE. AI in education: a review of personalised learning and educational technology. GSC Advanced Research and Reviews. 2024;18(2):261–271. https://doi.org/10.30574/gscarr.2024.18.2.0062
  17. Moltudal SH, Krumsvik RJ, Høydal KL. Adaptive learning technology in primary education: implications for professional teacher knowledge and classroom management. In: Frontiers in Education 2022. Frontiers Media SA; 2022. https://doi.org/10.30574/gscarr.2024.18.2.0062
  18. Xie H, Chu HC, Hwang G-J, Wang G-C. Trends and development in technology-enhanced adaptive/personalised learning: a systematic review of journal publications from 2007 to 2017. Computers & Education. 2019;140:103599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103599
  19. Castro R. Blended learning in higher education: trends and capabilities. Education and Information technologies. 2019;24(4):2523–2546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09886-3
  20. Redecker C. European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigComp Edu. Publications Office of the European Union; 2017. https://doi.org/10.2760/159770
  21. Mtebe JS. Applying UNESCO ICT competency framework to evaluate teachers’ ICT competence levels in Tanzania. In: Keengwe D. Handbook of Research on Innovative Pedagogies and Best Practices in Teacher Education. IGI Global; 2020. p. 350–366. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-9232-7.ch020
  22. Roberts J. Future and changing roles of staff in distance education: a study to identify training and professional development needs. In: Roberts J, Kigotho M, Stagg A. (eds.) Expanding Horizons in Open and Distance Learning. Routledge; 2020. p. 37–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2017.1419818
  23. Pohekar D. Role of ICT on universities’ administrative services and management. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology. 2018;5(11):266–271.
  24. Bradley VM. Learning Management System (LMS) use with online instruction. International Journal of Technology in Education. 2021;4(1):68–92. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.36
  25. Veluvali P, Surisetti J. Learning management system for greater learner engagement in higher education – a review. Higher Education for the Future. 2022;9(1):107–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/23476311211049855
  26. Weng C-H, Tang Y. The relationship between technology leadership strategies and effectiveness of school administration: an empirical study. Computers & Education. 2014;76:91–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.03.010
  27. Gajić J, Živković R, Stanić N. Key Attributes of successful communication between higher education institutions and prospective students. TEME: Jourlal for Cocial Siences. 2017;41(3):557–572. https://doi.org/10.22190/TEME1703557G
  28. Manoharan G, Ashtikar SP. Nexus between leadership and effective communication: implications for educational institutions. In: Neuroleadership Development and Effective Communication in Modern Business. IGI Global; 2024. p. 274–291. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-4350-0.ch015
  29. Tusriyanto, Siminto, Zaakiyyah HKh. Innovative strategies to enhance the quality of higher education management: human resource development and the critical role of communication. Journal of Contemporary Administration and Management (ADMAN). 2024;2(1):331–336. https://doi.org/10.61100/adman.v2i1.128
  30. FitzGerald E, Kucirkova N, Jones A, Cross S, Ferguson R, Herodotou C, Hillaire G. Dimensions of personalisation in technology-enhanced learning: a framework and implications for design. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2018;49(1):165–181. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12534
  31. Holmes W, Anastopoulou S, Schaumburg H, Mavrikis M. Technology-enhanced Personalised Learning: Untangling the evidence. Robert Bosch Stiftung; 2018. 116 p.
  32. Williams RTh. A systematic review of the continuous professional development for technology enhanced learning literature. Engineering International. 2020;8(2):61–72. https://doi.org/10.18034/ei.v8i2.506
  33. Şen N, Yildiz Durak H. Examining the relationships between English teachers’ lifelong learning tendencies with professional competencies and technology integrating self-efficacy. Education and Information Technologies. 2022;27(5):5953–5988. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10867-8
  34. Zhao Ya, Zhao M, Shi F. Integrating moral education and educational information technology: a strategic approach to enhance rural teacher training in universities. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. 2024;15(3):15053–15093. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01693-z
  35. Gündüzalp S. 21st century skills for sustainable education: prediction level of teac hers’ information literacy skills on their digital literacy skills. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education. 2021;12(1):85–101. https://doi.org/10.2478/dcse-2021-0007
  36. Raman A, Shariff SB. Relationship between technology leadership, ICT facility, comp etency, commitments towards effectiveness of school mangement tasks in schools. PEDAGOGIA: Jurnal Pendidikan. 2018;7(1):4–11. https://doi.org/10.21070/pedagogia.v7i1.1292
  37. Feng L, Jih-Lian HA. Effects of teachers’ information literacy on lifelong learning and school effectiveness. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. 2016;12(6):1653–1663. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1575a
  38. Heitink M, Voogt J, Fisser P, Verplanken L, van Braak J. Eliciting teachers’ technological pedagogical knowledge. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. 2017;33(3):96–109. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3505
  39. Serrano Lopez DR, Dea Ayuela MA, Gonzalez-Burgos E, Serrano-Gil A, Lalatsa K. Technology-enhanced learning in higher education: how to enhance student engagement through blended learning. European Journal of Education. 2019;54(2):273–286. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12330
  40. Day GS, Schoemaker PJ. Adapting to fast-changing markets and technologies. California Review Management. 2016;58(4):59–77. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2016.58.4.59
  41. Mashayekhi A. The role of leadership in fostering a culture of effective technology mana gement. Global Journal of Entrepreneurship and Management. 2024;5(2):20–31. https://doi.org/10.57585/GJEM.024.004
  42. Johari J, Shamsudin FM, Zainun NFH, Yean TF, Yahya KK. Institutional leadership competencies and job performance: the moderating role of proactive personality. International Journal of Educational Management. 2022;36(6):1027–1045. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-07-2021-0280
  43. Nikou Sh, De Reuver M, Mahboob Kanafi M. Workplace literacy skills – how information and digital literacy affect adoption of digital technology. Journal of Documentation. 2022;78(7):371–391. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-12-2021-0241
  44. Silamut AA, Petsangsri S. Self-directed learning with knowledge management model to enhance digital literacy abilities. Education and Information Technologies. 2020;25(6):4797–4815. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10187-3
  45. Elugbaju WK, Okeke NI, Alabi OlA. Conceptual framework for enhancing decision-making in higher education through data-driven governance. Global Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews. 2024;2(02):16–30. https://doi.org/10.58175/gjarr.2024.2.2.0055
  46. Dexter S, Richardson JW. What does technology integration research tell us about the leadership of technology? Journal of Research on Technology in Education. 2020;52(1):17–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2019.1668316
  47. Sabri SMd, Ismail I, Annuar N, Rahman NR, Abd Hamid NZ, Abd Mutalib H. A conceptual analysis of technology integration in classroom instruction towards enhancing student engagement and learning outcomes. International Journal of Education Psychology and Counseling. 2024;9(55):750–769. https://doi.org/10.35631/IJEPC.955051
  48. Adiyono A, Hayat EW, Oktavia ED, Prasetiyo NT. Learning interaction in the digital era: technological innovations and education management strategies to enhance student engagement. Journal of Research in Instructional. 2024;4(1):205–221. https://doi.org/10.30862/jri.v4i1.333
  49. Mei Kin T, Abdull Kareem O, Nordin MS, Wai Bing K. Principal change leadership competencies and teacher attitudes toward change: the mediating effects of teacher change beliefs. International Journal of Leadership in Education. 2018;21(4):427–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2016.1272719
  50. Manaf S. Educational management in the digital age: integrating technology for student success. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan. 2024;16(2):1451–1461. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v16i2.4919
  51. Hassan G. Technology and the transformation of educational practices: a future perspective. International Journal of Economic, Business, Accounting, Agriculture Management and Sharia Administration (IJEBAS). 2023;3(1):1596–1603. https://doi.org/10.54443/ijebas.v3i1.1136
  52. Engle RL, Tyler DA, Gormley KE, Afable MK, Curyto K, Adjognon OL, Parker VA, Sullivan JL. Identifying barriers to culture change: a qualitative analysis of the obstacles to delivering resident-centred care. Psychological Services. 2017;14(3):316. https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000169
  53. Shrivastava S, Pazzaglia F, Sonpar K, McLoughlin D. Effective communication during organisational change: a cross-cultural perspective. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management. 2022;29(3):675–697. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCSM-08-2021-0144
  54. Bo Liu. Strategic planning and resource allocation in higher education institutions. The Educational Review, USA. 2024;8(11):1359–1364. http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/er.2024.11.014
  55. Franco IB, Tracey J. Community capacity-building for sustainable development: effectively striving towards achieving local community sustainability targets. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education. 2019;20(4):691–725. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-02-2019-0052
  56. Martínez-Peláez R, Ochoa-Brust A, Rivera S, Félix VG, Ostos R, Brito H, Félix RA, Mena LJ. Role of digital transformation for achieving sustainability: mediated role of stakeholders, key capabilities, and technology. Sustainability. 2023;15(14):11221. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151411221
  57. Oladeinde M, Okeleke ECh, Adaramodu OR, Fakeyede OG, Farayola OA. Communicating IT audit findings: strategies for effective stakeholder engagement. Computer Science & IT Research Journal. 2023;4(2):126–139. https://doi.org/10.51594/csitrj.v4i2.612
  58. Anton NE, Bean EA, Myers E, Stefanidis D. Optimising learner engagement during mental skills training: a pilot study of small group vs. individualised training. The Ame rican Journal of Surgery. 2020;219(2):335–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.12.022
  59. Adera N. Innovative learning spaces and blended learning: quest for 21st century competency teaching and learning approaches. In: Creating Dynamic Space in Higher Education: Modern Shifts in Policy, Competencies, and Governance; 2025. p. 139–174. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-6930-2.ch006
  60. Ahsan MJ. Cultivating a culture of learning: the role of leadership in fostering lifelong development. The Learning Organisation: An International Journal. 2025;32(2):282–306. https://doi.org/10.1108/TLO-03-2024-0099
  61. Jusoh R, Md Dasuki N, Shu Q, Amram A. Sustainable leadership: encouraging teacher performance and classroom excellence. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. 2024;14(11):2350–2359.
  62. Sarker IH. Deep learning: a comprehensive overview on techniques, taxonomy, applications and research directions. SN Computer Science. 2021;2(6):1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-021-00815-1

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML
Жүктеу

Согласие на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика»

1. Я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных»), осуществляя использование сайта https://journals.rcsi.science/ (далее – «Сайт»), подтверждая свою полную дееспособность даю согласие на обработку персональных данных с использованием средств автоматизации Оператору - федеральному государственному бюджетному учреждению «Российский центр научной информации» (РЦНИ), далее – «Оператор», расположенному по адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А, со следующими условиями.

2. Категории обрабатываемых данных: файлы «cookies» (куки-файлы). Файлы «cookie» – это небольшой текстовый файл, который веб-сервер может хранить в браузере Пользователя. Данные файлы веб-сервер загружает на устройство Пользователя при посещении им Сайта. При каждом следующем посещении Пользователем Сайта «cookie» файлы отправляются на Сайт Оператора. Данные файлы позволяют Сайту распознавать устройство Пользователя. Содержимое такого файла может как относиться, так и не относиться к персональным данным, в зависимости от того, содержит ли такой файл персональные данные или содержит обезличенные технические данные.

3. Цель обработки персональных данных: анализ пользовательской активности с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика».

4. Категории субъектов персональных данных: все Пользователи Сайта, которые дали согласие на обработку файлов «cookie».

5. Способы обработки: сбор, запись, систематизация, накопление, хранение, уточнение (обновление, изменение), извлечение, использование, передача (доступ, предоставление), блокирование, удаление, уничтожение персональных данных.

6. Срок обработки и хранения: до получения от Субъекта персональных данных требования о прекращении обработки/отзыва согласия.

7. Способ отзыва: заявление об отзыве в письменном виде путём его направления на адрес электронной почты Оператора: info@rcsi.science или путем письменного обращения по юридическому адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А

8. Субъект персональных данных вправе запретить своему оборудованию прием этих данных или ограничить прием этих данных. При отказе от получения таких данных или при ограничении приема данных некоторые функции Сайта могут работать некорректно. Субъект персональных данных обязуется сам настроить свое оборудование таким способом, чтобы оно обеспечивало адекватный его желаниям режим работы и уровень защиты данных файлов «cookie», Оператор не предоставляет технологических и правовых консультаций на темы подобного характера.

9. Порядок уничтожения персональных данных при достижении цели их обработки или при наступлении иных законных оснований определяется Оператором в соответствии с законодательством Российской Федерации.

10. Я согласен/согласна квалифицировать в качестве своей простой электронной подписи под настоящим Согласием и под Политикой обработки персональных данных выполнение мною следующего действия на сайте: https://journals.rcsi.science/ нажатие мною на интерфейсе с текстом: «Сайт использует сервис «Яндекс.Метрика» (который использует файлы «cookie») на элемент с текстом «Принять и продолжить».