Digital horizons: understanding teacher retention challenges in Myanmar's rural basic education schools through the lens of informatization

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Resumo

Problem statement. The study delves into the multifaceted challenges of teacher retention in rural public basic education schools in Myanmar, with a special focus on the role of informatization in education. In areas often marginalized and facing unique socio-economic constraints, teacher turnover has become a pressing issue, impacting the quality of education. Methodology. This research adopts a qualitative insight from educators, to dissect the core factors influencing teacher retention. Key findings highlight inadequate infrastructural facilities, limited professional development opportunities, and socio-cultural barriers as primary deterrents. Results. The study uncovers how informatization - the integration of information and communication technologies (ICT) in education - can mitigate these challenges. It emphasizes that informatization not only enhances teaching-learning processes but also serves as a catalyst for teacher motivation and job satisfaction. Conclusion. The paper concludes with recommendations for policy interventions, emphasizing the need for a harmonized approach that interlaces traditional educational strategies with modern ICT solutions to foster a more stable and effective teaching workforce in Myanmar's rural landscapes.

Sobre autores

Wynn Marlar

Huazhong University of Science and Technology

Email: wynnmarlar.lin@gmail.com
PhD in Educational Economy and Management, School of Education 1037 Luoyu Road, Hu Bei Sheng, Wu Han Shi, 430074, People's Republic of China

Mohamad Zreik

Sun Yat-sen University

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: mohamadzreik1@gmail.com
ORCID ID: 0000-0002-6812-6529

PhD, Postdoctoral Fellow, School of International Studies

No. 2 Daxue Road, Xiangzhou District, Zhuhai, Guangdong Province, 519082, People's Republic of China

Bibliografia

  1. Lwin T. Global justice, national education and local realities in Myanmar: a civil society perspective. Asia Pacific Education Review. 2019;20(2):273-284.
  2. Belton B, Filipski M. Rural transformation in central Myanmar: by how much, and for whom? Journal of Rural Studies. 2019;67:166-176.
  3. Gomersall S, Floyd A. Resilience: Myanmar students’ experiences of overcoming eLearning challenges during COVID-19 and political instability. Asia Pacific Education Review. 2023;24(3):447-459.
  4. James H. Governance and civil society in Myanmar: education, health and environment. Routledge; 2005.
  5. South A, Lall MC. Schooling and conflict: ethnic education and mother tongue-based teaching in Myanmar. USAID; 2016.
  6. Malik RS. Educational challenges in 21st century and sustainable development. Journal of Sustainable Development Education and Research. 2018;2(1):9-20.
  7. Nieto S. The light in their eyes: creating multicultural learning communities. Teachers College Press; 2015.
  8. Donoghue F. The last professors: the corporate university and the fate of the humanities, with a new introduction. Fordham University Press; 2018.
  9. Day C, Gu Q, Sammons P. The impact of leadership on student outcomes: how successful school leaders use transformational and instructional strategies to make a difference. Educational Administration Quarterly. 2016;52(2):221-258.
  10. Tyner K. Literacy in a digital world: teaching and learning in the age of information. Routledge; 2014.
  11. Jiang Z, Wu H, Cheng H, Wang W, Xie AN, Fitzgerald SR. Twelve tips for teaching medical students online under COVID-19. Medical Education Online. 2021;26(1):1854066.
  12. Zreik M. Bridging the digital divide: the role of China-africa cooperation in the evolution of higher education amidst COVID-19 and beyond. In: Mashau P, Farisani T. (eds), Accessibility of Digital Higher Education in the Global South. IGI Global; 2024. p. 232-246. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-9179-9.ch012
  13. Meletiou-Mavrotheris M, Eteokleous N, Stylianou-Georgiou A. Emergency remote learning in higher education in Cyprus during COVID-19 lockdown: a zoom-out view of challenges and opportunities for quality online learning. Education Sciences. 2022;12(7):477.
  14. Gan B, Menkhoff T, Smith R. Enhancing students’ learning process through interactive digital media: new opportunities for collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior. 2015;5:652-663.
  15. Azionya CM, Nhedzi A. The digital divide and higher education challenge with emergency online learning: analysis of tweets in the wake of the COVID-19 lockdown. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education. 2021;22(4):164-182.
  16. Loonstra B, Brouwers A, Tomic W. Feelings of existential fulfilment and burnout among secondary school teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2009;25(5):752-757.
  17. Li Q, Gu Q, He W. Resilience of Chinese teachers: why perceived work conditions and relational trust matter. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives. 2019;17(3):143-159.
  18. Ingersoll RM. Who controls teachers' work?: power and accountability in America's schools. Harvard University Press; 2009.
  19. Ghosh P, Satyawadi R, Prasad Joshi J, Shadman M. Who stays with you? Factors predicting employees' intention to stay. International Journal of Organizational Analysis. 2013;21(3):288-312.
  20. Mancuso SV, Roberts L, White GP. Teacher retention in international schools: the key role of school leadership. Journal of Research in International Education. 2010;9(3):306-323.
  21. Zreik M. The paradox of educational inequality in Indonesia: socioeconomic implications and paths towards inclusion. In: Sart G, Tokal P, Myrvang N. (eds), Socio-Economic Implications of Global Educational Inequalities IGI Global; 2024. p. 69-85. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-0693-2.ch004
  22. Zreik M. Cultivating ILCs in China: a pathway to culturally sustaining and transformative education. In: Adams S, Breidenstein A. (eds), Exploring Meaningful and Sustainable Intentional Learning Communities for P-20 Educators. IGI Global; 2024. p. 120-140. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-7270-5.ch006
  23. Sheridan SM, Edwards CP, Marvin CA, Knoche LL. Professional development in early childhood programs: process issues and research needs. Early Education and Development. 2009;20(3):377-401.
  24. Farmer D. Teacher attrition: the impacts of stress. Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin. 2020;87(1):41-50.
  25. Torres AC. Is this work sustainable? Teacher turnover and perceptions of workload in charter management organizations. Urban Education. 2016;51(8):891-914.
  26. Sarafidou JO, Chatziioannidis G. Teacher participation in decision making and its impact on school and teachers. International Journal of Educational Management. 2013;7(2):170-183.
  27. Messacar D, Oreopoulos P. Staying in school: a proposal for raising high-school graduation rates. Issues in Science and Technology. 2013;29(2):55-61.
  28. Betz MR, Partridge MD, Fallah B. Smart cities and attracting knowledge workers: which cities attract highly-educated workers in the 21st century? Papers in Regional Science. 2016;95(4):819-841.
  29. Mojapelo SM. Challenges in establishing and maintaining functional school libraries: lessons from Limpopo Province, South Africa. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science. 2018;50(4):410-426.
  30. Deci EL, Ryan RM. Motivation, personality, and development within embedded social contexts: an overview of self-determination theory. The Oxford Handbook of Human Motivation. 2012;18(6):85-107.
  31. Haddix MM. Cultivating racial and linguistic diversity in literacy teacher education: teachers like me. Routledge; 2015.
  32. Wang MT, Degol JL. Gender gap in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM): current knowledge, implications for practice, policy, and future directions. Educational Psychology Review. 2017;29:119-140.
  33. Stang-Rabrig J, Brüggemann T, Lorenz R, McElvany N. Teachers’ occupational well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic: the role of resources and demands. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2022;117:103803.
  34. De Freitas SI, Morgan J, Gibson D. Will MOOCs transform learning and teaching in higher education? Engagement and course retention in online learning provision. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2015;46(3):455-471.
  35. Kraft MA, Simon NS, Lyon MA. Sustaining a sense of success: the protective role of teacher working conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2021;14(4):727-769.
  36. Palloff RM, Pratt K. Lessons from the virtual classroom: the realities of online teaching. John Wiley & Sons; 2013.
  37. Thein-Lemelson SM. ‘Politicide’ and the Myanmar coup. Anthropology Today. 2021; 37(2):3-5.
  38. Milio S, Garnizova E, Shkreli A. Assessment study of technical and vocational education and training (TVET) in Myanmar. International Labour Organization; 2014.
  39. Lall M. Myanmar’s education reforms: a pathway to social justice? UCL Press; 2021.
  40. Liu J, Bray M. Private subtractory tutoring: the negative impact of shadow education on public schooling in Myanmar. International Journal of Educational Development. 2020;76:102213.
  41. Cunningham W, Munoz R. Myanmar's future jobs: embracing modernity. World Bank; 2018.
  42. Carnegie M, Cornish PS, Htwe KK, Htwe NN. Gender, decision-making and farm practice change: an action learning intervention in Myanmar. Journal of Rural Studies. 2020;78:503-515.
  43. Smeda N, Dakich E, Sharda N. The effectiveness of digital storytelling in the classrooms: a comprehensive study. Smart Learning Environments. 2014;1:1-21.
  44. Woolf BP. Building intelligent interactive tutors: student-centered strategies for revolutionizing e-learning. Morgan Kaufmann; 2010.
  45. Kormos E, Wisdom K. Rural schools and the digital divide: technology in the learning experience. Theory & Practice in Rural Education. 2021;11(1):25-39.
  46. Toropova A, Myrberg E, Johansson S. Teacher job satisfaction: the importance of school working conditions and teacher characteristics. Educational Review. 2021;73(1):71-97.
  47. Liao YC, Ottenbreit-Leftwich A, Karlin M, Glazewski K, Brush T. Supporting change in teacher practice: examining shifts of teachers’ professional development preferences and needs for technology integration. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education. 2017;17(4):522-548.
  48. Nuere S, De Miguel L. The digital/technological connection with COVID-19: an unprecedented challenge in university teaching. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. 2021;26(4):931-943.
  49. Collins A, Halverson R. Rethinking education in the age of technology: the digital revolution and schooling in America. Teachers College Press; 2018.

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика»

1. Я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных»), осуществляя использование сайта https://journals.rcsi.science/ (далее – «Сайт»), подтверждая свою полную дееспособность даю согласие на обработку персональных данных с использованием средств автоматизации Оператору - федеральному государственному бюджетному учреждению «Российский центр научной информации» (РЦНИ), далее – «Оператор», расположенному по адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А, со следующими условиями.

2. Категории обрабатываемых данных: файлы «cookies» (куки-файлы). Файлы «cookie» – это небольшой текстовый файл, который веб-сервер может хранить в браузере Пользователя. Данные файлы веб-сервер загружает на устройство Пользователя при посещении им Сайта. При каждом следующем посещении Пользователем Сайта «cookie» файлы отправляются на Сайт Оператора. Данные файлы позволяют Сайту распознавать устройство Пользователя. Содержимое такого файла может как относиться, так и не относиться к персональным данным, в зависимости от того, содержит ли такой файл персональные данные или содержит обезличенные технические данные.

3. Цель обработки персональных данных: анализ пользовательской активности с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика».

4. Категории субъектов персональных данных: все Пользователи Сайта, которые дали согласие на обработку файлов «cookie».

5. Способы обработки: сбор, запись, систематизация, накопление, хранение, уточнение (обновление, изменение), извлечение, использование, передача (доступ, предоставление), блокирование, удаление, уничтожение персональных данных.

6. Срок обработки и хранения: до получения от Субъекта персональных данных требования о прекращении обработки/отзыва согласия.

7. Способ отзыва: заявление об отзыве в письменном виде путём его направления на адрес электронной почты Оператора: info@rcsi.science или путем письменного обращения по юридическому адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А

8. Субъект персональных данных вправе запретить своему оборудованию прием этих данных или ограничить прием этих данных. При отказе от получения таких данных или при ограничении приема данных некоторые функции Сайта могут работать некорректно. Субъект персональных данных обязуется сам настроить свое оборудование таким способом, чтобы оно обеспечивало адекватный его желаниям режим работы и уровень защиты данных файлов «cookie», Оператор не предоставляет технологических и правовых консультаций на темы подобного характера.

9. Порядок уничтожения персональных данных при достижении цели их обработки или при наступлении иных законных оснований определяется Оператором в соответствии с законодательством Российской Федерации.

10. Я согласен/согласна квалифицировать в качестве своей простой электронной подписи под настоящим Согласием и под Политикой обработки персональных данных выполнение мною следующего действия на сайте: https://journals.rcsi.science/ нажатие мною на интерфейсе с текстом: «Сайт использует сервис «Яндекс.Метрика» (который использует файлы «cookie») на элемент с текстом «Принять и продолжить».