Key elements of e-learning course design that provides high-quality prediction of student learning success
- 作者: Noskov M.V.1, Vainshtein Y.V.1, Somova M.V.1
-
隶属关系:
- Siberian Federal University
- 期: 卷 22, 编号 3 (2025)
- 页面: 288-303
- 栏目: CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT AND COURSE DESIGN
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2312-8631/article/view/321324
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-8631-2025-22-3-288-303
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/QQCBZI
- ID: 321324
如何引用文章
全文:
详细
Statement of the problem. The task of predicting student learning success is one of the most developed in educational analytics. At the same time, experience in the field of pedagogical design of e-learning courses, which are the main sources of students’ digital footprint data, is extremely limited. In these conditions, understanding what it should be like and what design elements are most important for it is becoming relevant. The purpose of the study is to determine the design elements of an e-learning course for effective prediction of educational results and to develop its generalized criteria-content model. Methodology . A comparative analysis of scientific, pedagogical, and methodological sources was applied. Verbal and communicative methods, comparative and statistical analysis of empirical data using a generative model of artificial intelligence were used. Results . The paper substantiates the need to develop high-precision e-learning courses for effective forecasting of students’ learning success based on such design elements as: content availability, structuring, discipline study schedule, assessment system, timely feedback, relevance and completeness of information, aesthetics and ergonomics. A generalized criteria-content model for constructing a high-precision e-learning course is proposed. Conclusion . The prospects for further development of the research and development of methodological recommendations for the design of pedagogical design of high-precision e-learning courses are outlined.
作者简介
Mikhail Noskov
Siberian Federal University
Email: mnoskov@sfu-kras.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4514-7925
SPIN 代码: 3957-7221
Doctor of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Professor, Professor of the Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Security, Institute of Space and Information Technologies
79 Svobodnyi Prospect, Krasnoyarsk, 660041, Russian FederationYuliya Vainshtein
Siberian Federal University
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: yweinstein@sfu-kras.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8370-7970
SPIN 代码: 9765-2130
Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Security, Institute of Space and Information Technologies
79 Svobodnyi Prospect, Krasnoyarsk, 660041, Russian FederationMarina Somova
Siberian Federal University
Email: msomova@sfu-kras.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8538-4108
SPIN 代码: 3986-2280
Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Depart ment of Applied Informatics, Institute of Space and Information Technologies
79 Svobodnyi Prospect, Krasnoyarsk, 660041, Russian Federation参考
- Freitas E, Fonseca F, Garcia VC, Falcão TP, Marques E, Gasevic D, Ferreira R. MMALA: developing and evaluating a maturity model for adopting learning analytics. Journal of Learning Analytics. 2024;11(1):1–20. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2024.8099 EDN: STSQKQ
- Arnold KE, Pistilli MD. Course signals at Purdue: using learning analytics to increase student success. In: Dawson Sh, Haythornthwaite C, Buckingham S, Gasevic D, Ferguson R. (eds.) ACM International Conference Proceeding Series: LAK 2012: Second International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, 29 April – 2 May 2012, Vancouver, Canada. New York: Association for Computing Machinery; 2012. p. 267–270. https://doi.org/10.1145/2330601.2330666
- Cagliero L, Canale L, Farinett L, Baralis E, Venuto E. Predicting student academic performance by means of associative classification. Applied Sciences. 2021;11(4):14–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11041420
- Mussida P, Lanzi PL. A computational tool for engineer dropout prediction. In: Kallel I, Kammon HM, Hsairi L. (eds.) 2022 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 28–31 March 2022, Tunis, Tunisia. New York: IEEE; 2022. p. 1571–1576. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON52537.2022.9766632
- Baneres D, Rodríguez ME, Serra M. An early feedback prediction system for learners at-risk within a first-year higher education subject. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies. 2019;12:249–263.
- Bañeres D, Rodríguez EM, Guerrero A-E, Guasch CP. An early warning system to identify and intervene online dropout learners. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 2023;20(1):3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00371-5 EDN: QCZRVB
- Munir H, Vogel B, Jacobsson A. Artificial intelligence and machine learning approaches in digital education: a systematic revision. Information. 2022;13(4):203. https://doi.org/10.3390/info13040203 EDN: MGCMCQ
- Sghir N, Adadi A, Lahmer M. Recent advances in predictive learning analytics: a decade systematic review (2012–2022). Education and Information Technologies. 2022;28(7):8299–8333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11536-0 EDN: BUNBDT
- Rabelo A, Rodrigues MW, Nobre C, Isotani S, Zárate L. Educational data mining and learn ing analytics: a review of educational management in e-learning. Information Discovery and Delivery. 2023;52(4):149–163. https://doi.org/10.1108/IDD-10-2022-0099 EDN: NOBACL
- Fan O, Liyin Z. AI-driven learning analytics applications and tools in computer-supported collaborative learning: a systematic review. Educational Research Review. 2024;44(4):100616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100616
- Seyyed KB, Hojjat D, Douglas BC, Omid N, Harm JA Biemans. Learning analytics for online game-Based learning: a systematic literature review. Behaviour & Information Technology. 2024;43(12):2689–2716. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929x.2023.2255301
- Márquez L, Henríquez V, Chevreux H, Scheihing E, Guerra Ju. Adoption of learning analytics in higher education institutions: a systematic literature review. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2023;55(2):439–459. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13385
- Kustitskaya TA, Esin RV, Vainshtein YuV, Noskov MV. Hybrid approach to predicting learning success Based on digital educational history for timely identification of at-risk students. Education Sciences. 2024;14(6):657. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/14/6/657 EDN: ARKNTV
- Toktarova VI, Pashkova YuA. Predictive analytics in digital education: analysis and evaluation of students’ learning success. Siberian Pedagogical Journal. 2022;(1):97–106 (In Russ.) http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/1813-4718.2201.09 EDN: NSPMDR
- Almasri A, Celebi E, Alkhawaldeh RS. EMT: Ensemble meta-based tree model for predicting student performance. Scientific Programming. 2019;3610248. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3610248 EDN: DVYAWH
- Egorova ES, Popova NA. Data Mining in education: predicting student performance. Modeling, Optimization and Information Technology. 2023;11(2):18–29. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26102/2310-6018/2023.41.2.003 EDN: XFTHUA
- Gasevic Dr, Dawson Sh, Rogers T, Gasevic D. Learning analytics should not promote one size fits all: the effects of instructional conditions in predicting academic success. The Internet and Higher Education. 2016;28(1):68–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.10.002
- Gunawardena Ch-N, Whiteside A, Garrett Dikkers A, Swan K. (eds.) Social presence in online learning: multiple perspectives on practice and research. New York: Routledge; 2017. 256 р.
- Kirkwood A, Price L. Technology-enhanced learning and teaching in higher education: what is ‘enhanced’ and how do we know? A critical literature review. Learning, Media and Technology. 2014;39(1):6–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2013.770404
- Mayer R. (ed.) The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press; 2005. 99 p.
- Wang F, Hannafin MJ. Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research & Development. 2005;53:5–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02504682 EDN: CTANKK
- Brohi SN, Pillai TR, Kaur S, Kaur H, Sukumaran S, Asirvatham D. Accuracy comparison of machine learning algorithms for predictive analytics in higher education. In: Miraz MH, Excell PS, Ware A, Soomro S, Ali M. (eds.) Emerging Technologies in Computing: Secound International Conference, iGETiG 2019, 19–20 August 2019: Proceeding, London, UK. Cham: Springer; 2019. p. 254–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23943-5_19
- Almaiah MA, Alyoussef IY. Analysis of the effect of course design, course content support, course assessment and instructor characteristics on the actual use of e-learning system. IEEE Access. 2019;7(1-1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2956349
- Brown AR, Voltz BD. Elements of effective e-learning design. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 2005;6(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v6i1.217
- Noskov M, Fedotova I, Somova M, Vainshtein Yu. Mathematical model for early prediction of learning success. In: International Scientific and Practical Conference on “Modern Problems of Applied Mathematics and Information Technology (MPAMIT2022)”, 11–12 May 2022, Bukhara, Uzbekistan. Melville: AIP Publishing; 2024;3004(1):070001. EDN: NDKRUS
- Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J, Franklin J. The elements of statistical learning: Data mining, inference, and prediction. The Mathematical Intelligencer. 2004;27(2):83–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02985802
补充文件
