The attitude of future teachers towards the use of generative artificial intelligence in solving professional tasks
- Authors: Minakov A.I.1,2, Zenkina S.V.3
-
Affiliations:
- Moscow University of Humanities, Technology and Management
- Moscow Financial and Industrial University “Synergy”
- Corporate University of Education Development
- Issue: Vol 22, No 2 (2025)
- Pages: 195-208
- Section: ICT SKILLS AND COMPETENCIES AMONG TEACHERS
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2312-8631/article/view/321335
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-8631-2025-22-2-195-208
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/BUFBLX
- ID: 321335
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Problem statement. The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into the field of education has become one of the key factors transforming pedagogical activities worldwide. The proliferation of generative AI tools (ChatGPT, DeepSeek, GigaChat) is accompanied by numerous discussions about their impact on the learning process and teachers’ professional activities. Among the main challenges highlighted in the global academic literature are: 1) the lack of unified attitudes towards AI use; 2) insufficient digital literacy among participants in the educational process; and 3) ethical and long-term risks of applying AI in education. The aim of this study is to explore future teachers’ attitudes towards the use of generative AI in solving professional tasks and to determine the impact of additional training on their perception of AI tools. Methodology. The empirical study involved 32 students pursuing a pedagogical profile. Surveys were conducted before and after completing an elective course on the use of AI in teachers’ professional activities. Methods included self-assessment (attitude survey), analysis of survey data, and statistical processing of results using the Student’s t-test to assess the significance of changes in future teachers’ attitudes towards AI. Results. The significance of additional training for improving future teachers’ attitudes towards AI has been confirmed. It was found that generative AI is perceived most positively in text generation tasks, while tasks involving assignment grading and generating video and audio materials inspire the least trust. The training helped reduce negative perceptions and improved the attitude towards using AI in solving professional tasks. Conclusion. The findings confirm the need for targeted training for future teachers in the fundamentals of AI to minimize negative aspects and ensure effective use of the technology. The developed principles could form the basis for creating educational disciplines and professional development courses, enabling more rational and safe applications of AI in education.
Keywords
About the authors
Aleksandr I. Minakov
Moscow University of Humanities, Technology and Management; Moscow Financial and Industrial University “Synergy”
Author for correspondence.
Email: am@infodrive.pro
ORCID iD: 0009-0004-7584-4467
SPIN-code: 1073-5416
Teacher, Moscow University of Humanities, Technology and Management; postgraduate researcher, Faculty of Pedagogy and Psychology, Moscow Financial and Industrial University “Synergy”
15/2 Pervoy Mayovki Alley, Moscow, 111395, Russian Federation; 80B/5 Leningradsky Prospect, Moscow, 125315, Russian FederationSvetlana V. Zenkina
Corporate University of Education Development
Email: svetlana_zenkina@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8458-4426
SPIN-code: 5647-8718
Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor at the Department of Natural and Mathematical Disciplines
13 Industrialnaya St, Mytishchi, 141006, Russian FederationReferences
- Konstaninova LV, Vorozhikhina VV, Petrova AM, Titova ES, Shtykhno DA. Generative artificial intelligence in education: discussions and forecasts. Open Education. 2023;27(2):36-48. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/1818-4243-2023-2-36-48
- Pospelova EA, Ototsky PL, Gorlacheva EN, Faizullin RV. Generative artificial intelligence in education: current trends and prospects. Vocational Education and Labour Market. 2024;12(3):6-21. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.52944/PORT.2024.58.3.001
- Rezaev AV, Stepanov AM, Tregubova ND. Higher education in the age of artificial intelligence. Higher Education in Russia. 2024;33(4):49-62. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/ 10.31992/0869-3617-2024-33-4-49-62
- Subbotina MV. Artificial intelligence and higher education - enemies or allies. RUDN Journal of Sociology. 2024;24(1):176-183. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22363/23132272-2024-24-1-176-183
- Raitskaya LK, Lambovska MR. Prospects for ChatGPT application in higher education: a scoping review of international research. Integration of Education. 2024;28(1):10-21. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.114.028.202401.010-021
- Buyakova KI, Dmitriev YaA, Ivanova AS, Feshchenko AV, Yakovleva KI. Students’ and teachers’ attitudes towards the use of tools with generative artificial intelligence at the university. The Education and Science Journal. 2024;(7):160-193. (In Russ.) https://doi. org/10.17853/1994-5639-2024-7-160-193
- Aleshkovski IA, Gasparishvili AT, Narbut NP, Krukhmaleva OV, Savina NE. Russian students on the potential and limitations of artificial intelligence in education. RUDN Journal of Sociology. 2024;24(2):335-353. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22363/23132272-2024-24-2-335-353
- Minakov AI. Artificial intelligence in education is a current direction in the training of modern teachers. World of Science. Pedagogy and Psychology. 2024;12(1):65PDMN124. (In Russ.) https://mir-nauki.com/PDF/65PDMN124.pdf
- Minakov AI. Artificial intelligence and neural networks in education: teaching aid. Moscow: Direct-Media; 2024. (In Russ.)
- Ivakhnenko EN, Nikolskiy VS. ChatGPT in higher education and science: a threat or a valuable resource? Higher Education in Russia. 2023;32(4):9-22. (In Russ.) https:// doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2023-32-4-9-22
- Zhukov AD. Generative artificial intelligence in the educational process: challenges and prospects. The Bulletin of Moscow State University of Culture and Arts. 2023;5:66-75. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24412/1997-0803-2023-5115-66-75
- Aleynikova DV. Artificial intelligence in teaching and learning: revisiting the problem of educational product quality. Vestnik of Moscow State Linguistic University. Education and Teaching. 2023;4:16-20. (In Russ.)
- Chan SKY, Tsi LHY. Will generative AI replace teachers in higher education? A study of teacher and student perceptions. Studies in Educational Evaluation. 2024;83:101395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101395
- Nyaaba M, Shi L, Nabang M, Zhai X, Kyeremeh P, Ayoberd SA, Akanzire BN. Generative AI as a learning buddy and teaching assistant: Pre-service teachers’ uses and attitudes. ArXiv [Preprint] 2024. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2407.11983 (accessed: 30.11.2024)
- Ghimire A, Prather J, Edwards J. Generative AI in education: A study of educators’ awareness, sentiments, and influencing factors. ArXiv [Preprint] 2024. https://doi.org/ 10.48550/arXiv.2403.15586 (accessed: 30.11.2024)
- Oh S, Ahn Y. Exploring teachers’ perception of artificial intelligence: The socioemotional deficiency as opportunities and challenges in human-AI complementarity in K-12 education. ArXiv [Preprint] 2024. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2405.13065 (accessed: 30.11.2024)
- Viberg O, Cukurova M, Feldman-Maggor Y, Alexandron G, Shirai S, Kanemune S et al. What explains teachers’ trust in AI in education across six countries? International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-024-00433-x
Supplementary files
