Board games as a tool for political education: Potential and limitations
- 作者: Skipin N.S.1
-
隶属关系:
- Institute of Scientific Information on Social Sciences, Russian Academy of Sciences
- 期: 卷 27, 编号 2 (2025): Political Game Studies
- 页面: 261-271
- 栏目: POLITICAL GAME STUDIES
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2313-1438/article/view/322496
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1438-2025-27-2-261-271
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/KPSHSP
- ID: 322496
如何引用文章
全文:
详细
The Game Studies subdiscipline still poorly examined the potential of board games in political education and their semantic and methodological limitations. The findings from the board game study can be extrapolated to digital gamification and business games but taking into account that each of these methods has its own characteristics. As examples, the concepts of Discussion à Visées Démocratique et Philosophique by the contemporary philosopher M. Tozzi and “philosophy for children” by M. Lipman are cited as tools for developing the education of a democratically oriented citizen. The game technologies are effective tools for political education of pupils and nurturing certain democratic values in them. However, the introduction of board games into the educational process is complicated by a number of limitations. Among the main problem areas are the following: simplification of the modelled processes for easy entry into the game; limitations related to game mechanics; complexity of creating game components and interface; assessment of the game’s effectiveness in the issue of political education. In order to effectively use the potential of gamification in political education, the author proposes to force the transition to the practical stage of formation of game methods in domestic education.
作者简介
Nikolai Skipin
Institute of Scientific Information on Social Sciences, Russian Academy of Sciences
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: skipin@inion.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4267-0099
researcher
Moscow参考
- Baryshnikova, E.N., & Trofimova, G.N. (2020). Simulation training in the Russian as a foreign language lesson (level B2). Russian Language Abroad, 2(279). (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.37632/pi.2020.279.2.006
- Belov, S.I. (2022a). Are video games a tool for the formation of collective ideas about the events of the past, present and future? Designing the future. The challenges of digital reality, 1(5), 223–233. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.20948/future-2022-20
- Belov, S.I. (2022b). Historical symbolism of video games as a factor in correcting the social memory of the general public (on the materials of the Assassin’s Creed franchise). Dialogue with Time, 81, 242–248. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.21267/aquilo.2022.81.81.017
- Belov, S.I., & Kretova, A.A. (2020). Computer games as a resource of the politics of memory: practical experience and hidden opportunities (based on games representing World War II events). Bulletin of the Moscow State Regional University (History and Political Science), 1, 54–63. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-676x-2020-1-54-63
- Bogdanov, A.V. (2020a). The game of politics vs. the political game: Posing a problem (part 1). Izvestia of Saratov University. Sociology Politology, 20(3), 362–365. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.18500/1818-9601-2020-20-3-362-365
- Bogdanov, A.V. (2020b). The game of politics vs. the political game: Posing a problem (Part 2). Izvestia of Saratov University. New Series. Series: Sociology. Politology, 20(4), 470–473. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.18500/1818-9601-2020-20-4-470-473
- Voitishk, E.E., Kudinova, M.A., & Shmakova, A.S. (2015). Game traditions and ritual wine drinking in the culture of East Asia peoples. Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology, 14(4), 92–100. (In Russian).
- Korneichuk, B.V. (2018). Business game in the context of post-industrial development. Engineering education, 23, 124–129. (In Russian)
- Muradova, N.M. (2019). Business simulation as an element of gamification. Plekhanovskii Barometr, (4), 37–39. (In Russian).
- Ryzhakov, A.N. (2023). Gamification and experience of using scientific board games in the popularization of scientific and technological activities in the field of land reclamation. Ways of Increasing the Efficiency of Irrigated Agriculture, (3), 332–343. (In Russian).
- Sartakova, E.E. (2022). Problems of development of the theory of gamification in Russia. TSPU Bulletin, (2), 168–187. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.23951/1609-624X-2022-2-168-187
- Skipin, N.S., Vaganov, M.G., Ivanov, K.V., & Fedotov, M.S. (2019). Philosophical duel: A methodological guide. CHOU VO MIDiS. (In Russian).
- Yulina, N.S. (Ed.). (1996). Filosofiya dlya detei [Philosophy for children]. IF RAN. (In Russian).
- Shpak, G.V. (2022). Board games in England of the Georgian era as a tool of education, upbringing and distribution of scientific knowledge. Prepodavatel XXI Vek, (3–2), 337–352. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31862/2073-9613-2022-3-337-352
- Chirouter E. (2020). Pratiques de la philosophie avec les enfants. Les Cahiers Dynamiques/Les Cahiers Dynamiques, 76(3), 73–82. https://doi.org/10.3917/lcd.076.0073
- Connac, S. (2018). Coopération entre élèves, éducation à la citoyenneté et écriture à l’école primaire. Educations, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.21494/iste.op.2019.0369
- Lipman, M. (1988). Philosophy goes to school. Temple University Press.
- Magadán-Díaz, M., & Rivas-García, J.I. (2022). Gamificación del aula en la enseñanza superior online: el uso de Kahoot. Campus Virtuales, 11(1), 137. https://doi.org/10.54988/cv.2022.1.978
- Tozzi, M. (2013). La dialectique démocratie-philosophie dans une DVDP (Discussion à Visées Démocratique et Philosophique). Diotime.lafabriquephilosophique.be. Retrieved from https://diotime.lafabriquephilosophique.be/numeros/057/012
补充文件
