The Relationships between Moral Foundations, Social Beliefs and Attitudes towards Economic Inequality among Russian Youth: A Case Study of Altai Krai

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Resumo

This article presents the results of an empirical study on the relationships between moral foundations, social beliefs and attitudes towards economic inequality among young people. The topic of attitudes towards economic inequality has primarily been considered by sociologists and economists in the context of group differences, while its psychological factors and correlations have remained understudied. Different negative consequences of economic inequality can be mediated by such psychological mechanisms as subjective perception of existing inequality or personal attitudes towards it, which indicate the significance of this problem. In our study, we put forward a hypothesis that attitudes towards economic inequality among young people are related to moral foundations and social beliefs. To test this hypothesis, a study was conducted with a sample of 215 students (21% of the sample were male). The subjects completed The Scales of Dangerous World Beliefs and Jungle World Beliefs by J. Duckitt, The Moral Foundations Questionnaire by J. Graham and colleagues, and The Scale of Beliefs about Inequality by J. Kluegel and E. Smith. One of the objectives of this study was the development of a Russian version of the questionnaire by J. Kluegel and E. Smith, which full version is given in the appendix of the article. The correlations revealed that attitudes towards inequality are related to moral foundations (fairness, purity, and loyalty) and beliefs in a jungle world. Additionally, structural equation modeling has shown that approval of equality and inequality is most closely related to family welfare. Furthermore, this study found that the relationship between attitudes towards inequality and individualizing moral foundations is mediated by beliefs in a jungle world. Thus, sense of fairness and the value of caring for the weak and defenseless is opposed to beliefs in a jungle world and approval of inequality.

Sobre autores

Oleg Sychev

Shukshin Altai State University for Humanities and Pedagogy

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: osn1@mail.ru

Ph.D. in Psychology, is research fellow

53 Korolenko St, Biysk, 659333, Russian Federation

Irina Protasova

Shukshin Altai State University for Humanities and Pedagogy

Email: protasovain@mail.ru

Ph.D. in Psychology, Associate Professor, is Associate Professor of Chair of Pedagogy and Psychology

53 Korolenko St, Biysk, 659333, Russian Federation

Bibliografia

  1. Bullock, H.E., Williams, W.R., & Limbert, W.M. (2003). Predicting support for welfare policies: The impact of attributions and beliefs about inequality. Journal of Poverty, 7(3), 35-56. https://doi.org/10.1300/J134v07n03_03
  2. Duckitt, J., Wagner, C., du Plessis, I., & Birum, I. (2002). The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: Testing a dual process model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(1), 75-93. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.83.1.75
  3. Franks, A.S., & Scherr, K.C. (2019). Economic Issues Are Moral Issues: The Moral Underpinnings of the Desire to Reduce Wealth Inequality. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(4), 553-562. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618772821
  4. García-Castro, J.D., Willis, G.B., & Rodríguez-Bailón, R. (2019). I know people who can and who cannot: A measure of the perception of economic inequality in everyday life. The Social Science Journal, 56(4), 599-608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2018.09.008
  5. Graham, J., Haidt, J., Koleva, S., Motyl, M., Iyer, R., Wojcik, S., & Ditto, P.H. (2013). Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 55-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407236-7.00002-4
  6. Graham, J., Nosek, B.A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P.H. (2011). Mapping the Moral Domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 366-385. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021847
  7. Gulevich, O.A., Anikeenok, O.A., & Bezmenova, I.K. (2014). Social Beliefs: Adaptation of J. Duckitt’s Scales. Psychology. Journal of Higher School of Economics, 11(2), 68-89. (In Russ.)
  8. Haidt, J., & Bjorklund, F. (2008). Social intuitionists’ answer six questions about moral psychology. In Moral psychology. Vol 2. The cognitive science of morality: Intuition and diversity (pp. 181-217). Cambridge, MA, US: MIT Press.
  9. Haidt, J., Graham, J., & Joseph, C. (2009). Above and Below Left - Right: Ideological Narratives and Moral Foundations. Psychological Inquiry, 20(2-3), 110-119. https://doi.org/10.1080/10478400903028573
  10. Khashchenko, V.A. (2011). Subjective economic well-being and its measurement: Constructing and validating a questionnaire. Experimental Psychology (Russia), 4(1), 106-127. (In Russ.)
  11. Kim, H., Huh, S., Choi, S., & Lee, Y. (2018). Perceptions of inequality and attitudes towards redistribution in four East Asian welfare states. International Journal of Social Welfare, 27(1), 28-39. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12266
  12. Kluegel, J.R., & Smith, E.R. (1986). Beliefs about Inequality: Americans’ Views of What is and What Ought to be. Routledge.
  13. Kozlova, M.A., & Kozlov, A.I. (2016). The origins of individual-oriented and group-oriented morality: Social-psychological and scientific aspects. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 37(3), 60-70. (In Russ.)
  14. Larsen, C.A. (2016). How three narratives of modernity justify economic inequality. Acta Sociologica, 59(2), 93-111. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699315622801
  15. Nestik, T.A., & Zhuravlev, A.L. (2018). Psikhologiya global'nykh riskov. Moscow: IP RAN Publ. (In Russ.)
  16. Norton, M.I., & Ariely, D. (2011). Building a better America - One wealth quintile at a time. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 9-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393524
  17. Randazzo, A., & Haidt, J. (2015). The moral narratives of economists. Econ Journal Watch, 12(1), 49-57.
  18. Roex, K.L., Huijts, T., & Sieben, I. (2019). Attitudes towards income inequality: ‘Winners’ versus ‘losers’ of the perceived meritocracy. Acta Sociologica, 62(1), 47-63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699317748340
  19. Sychev, O.A., Bespalov, A.M., Prudnikova, M.M., & Vlasov, M.S. (2016). Features of Moral Foundations in Mongol, German and Russian Adolescents. Cultural-Historical Psychology, 12(1), 85-96. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2016120109
  20. Sychev, O.A., Protasova, I.N., & Belousov, K.I. (2018). Diagnosing Moral Foundations: Testing of the Russian Version of the Moral Foundations Questionnaire. Russian Psychological Journal, 15(3), 88-115. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2018.3.5
  21. Telin, K.O. (2019). Divergence in mind: Why inequality devil is as black as he is painted. Voprosy Ekonomiki, (4), 107-123. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2019-4-107-123
  22. Wang, J., & Wang, X. (2020). Structural equation modeling: Applications using Mplus. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
  23. Wiwad, D., et al. (2019). The support for economic inequality scale: Development and adjudication. PloS One, 14(6), e0218685. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218685
  24. Zaikin, V.A. (2017). Moral functioning: Socio-psychological approach. Social intuitionist theory of John Haidt. National Psychological Journal, 25(1), 32-38. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.11621/npj.2017.0104
  25. Zhuravlev, A.L., & Yurevich A.V. (2018). Izbytochnoe neravenstvo dokhodov kak ugroza bezopasnosti sovremennogo obshchestva. In A.L. Zhuravlev, & D.A. Kitova (Eds.), Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya global’nykh protsessov: Predposylki, tendentsii, perspektivy. Moscow: IP RAN Publ. (In Russ.)

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML
Baixar

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).