Mutual Acculturation of Russians and Armenians in the Krasnodar Territory
- 作者: Galyapina V.N.1, Tuchina O.R.2, Apollonov I.A.2
-
隶属关系:
- National Research University Higher School of Economics
- Kuban State Technological University
- 期: 卷 20, 编号 2 (2023)
- 页面: 197-210
- 栏目: PERSONALITY AND CONTEMPORARY CHALLENGES
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2313-1683/article/view/326154
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2023-20-2-197-210
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/VUXLTR
- ID: 326154
如何引用文章
详细
Mutual intercultural relations between the dominant population and representatives of ethnic minorities or migrants have been studied in sufficient detail by both foreign and Russian researchers. However, some minorities have a special status and are referred to by Russian researchers as ‘indigenized’ ones. Armenians belong to such ethnic groups. In this regard, it is of interest to study the mutual intercultural relations between representatives of the ethnic majority and Armenians as an indigenized ethnic minority. This study was conducted in the context of J. Berry’s ecocultural approach. The purpose of the study was to test three hypotheses of intercultural relations (multiculturalism, contact and integration). The sample included Russians ( N = 198; men - 50%; M age = 19.7) and Armenians ( N = 186, men - 43%, M age = 23.3) from the Krasnodar territory, the total sample N = 388. The research methods included scales from the MIRIPS questionnaire adapted to the Russian sample. Using structural equation modeling, the results indicating that the perceived security of the Russian and Armenian respondents predicted their attitudes to support a multicultural ideology were obtained; for the Armenians, this was also positively associated with the integration strategy and negatively associated with the assimilation attitudes. Intercultural friendly contacts among Russians and Armenians were positively associated with ethnic tolerance; however, among the Armenians they were also associated with the integration and assimilation strategies. The Armenians’ preference for the separation strategy predicted their life satisfaction; for the Russians, however, their expectation of the Armenians’ separation did not contribute to their self-esteem. In general, the results of the study had shown that the perceived security and especially intensive intercultural friendly contacts lead to the mutual integration of the non-indigenous ethnic minority and the ethnic majority. The historically determined features of the Krasnodar territory, multiculturalism and multiconfessionalism, as well as the absence of assimilation imposed by the ethnic majority, are important conditions for the successful mutual acculturation of the Russians and representatives of the ‘indigenized ethnic minority’, i.e., the Armenians of the Kuban.
作者简介
Victoria Galyapina
National Research University Higher School of Economics
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: vgalyapina@hse.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3885-1455
SPIN 代码: 2391-7845
Ph.D. in Psychology, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Psychology, Chief Researcher of the Center for Sociocultural Research, Faculty of Social Sciences
20 Myasnitskaya St, Moscow, 101000, Russian FederationOksana Tuchina
Kuban State Technological University
Email: tuchena@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5525-7645
SPIN 代码: 6989-5374
Doctor of Psychology, Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of History, Philosophy and Psychology
2 Moskovskaya St, Krasnodar, 350072, Russian FederationIvan Apollonov
Kuban State Technological University
Email: obligo@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1926-8213
SPIN 代码: 7423-6142
Doctor of Philosophy, Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of History, Philosophy and Psychology
2 Moskovskaya St, Krasnodar, 350072, Russian Federation参考
- Barrette, G., Bourhis, R.Y., Personnaz, M., & Personnaz, B. (2004). Acculturation orientations of French and North American undergraduates in Paris. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 28, 415-438.
- Berberyan, A.S., & Tuchina, O.R. (2018). Research of national identity and historical experience of a person in the titular Armenian ethnos and associated Armenian diaspora in Russia. Russian Journal of Psychology, 15(2), 190-214. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2018.2.8
- Berry, J.W. (1990). Psychology of acculturation. In J. Berman (Ed.), Cross-Cultural Perspectives, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (pp. 201-234). Lincoln, NE.: University of Nebraska Press.
- Berry, J.W. (2019). Ecocultural psychology. Cultural-Historical Psychology, 15(4), 4-16. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2019150401
- Berry, J.W. (Ed.). (2017). Mutual intercultural relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316875032
- Berry, J.W., Phinney J.S., Sam, D.L., & Vedder, P. (2006). Immigrant youth: Acculturation, identity, and adaptation. Applied Psychology, 55, 303-332.
- Diener, E., Emmons, R.A., Larsen, R.J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
- Dixon, J., Durrheim, K., & Tredoux, C. (2005). Beyond the optimal contact strategy: A reality check for the contact hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60, 697-711.
- Dmitriev, A.V., Voronov, V.V., & Mikhailova, E.A. (2017). Predictive modeling of interethnic relations in Russian regions based on the analysis of identification strategies of diaspora and compatriot groups. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and social Changes, (6), 97-124. (In Russ.)
- Galyapina, V., Tuchina, O., & Apollonov, I. (2022). Acculturation of Armenians in Russia: Role of social identities and diaspora activity. Central Asia and the Caucasus, 22(4), 104-111.
- Galyapina, V.N. (2017). Intercultural relations in the Republic of North Ossetia - Alania. In N.M. Lebedeva (Ed.), Intercultural Relations in the Post-Soviet Space (pp. 186-211). Moscow: Menedzher Publ. (In Russ.)
- Galyapina, V.N., & Lebedeva, N. (2016). Is multiculturalism in Russia possible? Intercultural relations in North Ossetia-Alania. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 9(1), 24-40. https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2016.0102
- Galyapina, V.N., & Lepshokova, Z.Kh. (2017). Interethnic relations in modern Dagestan. In N.M. Lebedeva (Ed.), Intercultural Relations in the Post-Soviet Space (pp. 212-239). Moscow: Menedzher Publ. (In Russ.)
- Galyapina, V.N., Lepshokova, Z., & Molodikova, I.N. (2021). Intercultural relations in Dagestan: The role of perceived security, intercultural contacts, and mutual acculturation. Central Asia and the Caucasus, 22(1), 75-90.
- Jasinskaja-Lahti, I., Liebkind, K., Horenczyk, G., & Schmitz, P. (2003). The interactive nature of acculturation: Perceived discrimination, acculturation attitudes and stress among young ethnic repatriates in Finland, Israel and Germany. International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 27(1), 79-97.
- Kodzha, E.A., Lebedeva, N.M., Galyapina, V.N., Lepshokova, Z.Kh., & Ryabichenko, T.A. (2019). Intercultural relations in the Russian Crimea: An empirical test of three hypotheses. Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 16(2), 250-268. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2019-2-250-268
- Koryakin, K. (2007). Social and cultural aspects of the adaptation of Armenian migrants in the Krasnodar territory (1988-2006). Ph.D. in Sociology Thesis. Moscow. (In Russ.)
- Kosic, A., Mannetti, L., & Lackland, S.D. (2005). The role of majority attitudes toward out-group in the perception of the acculturation strategies of immigrants. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29(3), 273-288
- Lebedeva, N., Galyapina, V.N., Lepshokova, Z., & Ryabichenko, T. (2017). Intercultural relations in Russia. In J.W. Berry (Ed.), Mutual Intercultural Relations (pp. 34-58). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316875032.002
- Lebedeva, N.M. (Ed.). (2017). Intercultural relations in the post-Soviet space. Moscow: Menedzher Publ. (In Russ.)
- Lebedeva, N.M., & Tatarko, A.N. (2013). Immigration and intercultural interaction strategies in post-Soviet Russia. In E. Tartakovsky (Ed.), Immigration: Policies, Challenges and Impact (pp. 179-194). New York: Nova Science.
- Lebedeva, N.M., & Tatarko, A.N. (2017). Intercultural relations of Latvians and Russians in post-Soviet Latvia. In N.M. Lebedeva (Ed.), Intercultural Relations in the Post-Soviet Space (pp. 301-323). Moscow: Menedzher Publ. (In Russ.)
- Lebedeva, N.M., & Tatarko, A.N. (Eds.). (2009). Strategies for intercultural interaction between migrants and the population of Russia. Moscow: RUDN University. (In Russ.)
- Leontieva, O.B., & Mkrtchyan, L.G. (2020). Armenian diaspora in Russia: Contemporary approaches to studying. Vestnik of Samara University. History, Pedagogics, Philology, 26(4), 8-14. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18287/2542-0445-2020-26-4-8-14
- Lepshokova, Z.Kh. (2017). Intercultural relations of Kabardians, Balkars and Russians in the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic. In N.M. Lebedeva (Ed.), Intercultural Relations in the Post-Soviet Space (pp. 156-186). Moscow: Menedzher Publ. (In Russ.)
- Ljujic, V., Vedder, P.H., Dekker, H., & Van Geel, M. (2010). Serbian adolescents' Romaphobia and their acculturation orientations towards the Roma minority. Paper presented at the British Psychological Society, Social Psychology Section Annual Conference. Winchester: University of Winchester.
- Redfield, R., Linton, R., & Herskovits, M.J. (1936). Memorandum for the study of acculturation. American Anthropologist, 38(1), 149-152. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1936.38.1.02a00330
- Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent child. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Ryabichenko, T.A., & Lebedeva, N.M. (2017). Mutual acculturation of migrants and the host population in central Russia. In N.M. Lebedeva (Ed.), Intercultural Relations in the Post-Soviet Space (pp. 57-81). Moscow: Menedzher Publ. (In Russ.)
- Schalk-Soekar, S.R.G., & Van de Vijver, F.J.R. (2004). The concept of multiculturalism: A study among Dutch majority members. Journal of Psycho-Social Studies, 9(38), 2152-2152.
- Shapovalov, S.N. (2015). Some aspects of Armenian migration to the Krasnodar territory. Society: Sociology, Psychology, Pedagogy, (4), 13-15.
- Tropp, L.R., & Pettigrew, T.F. (2005). Relationships between intergroup contact and prejudice among minority and majority status groups. Psychological Science, 16, 951-957.
- Ward, C., & Masgoret, A.M. (2008). Attitudes toward immigrants, immigration, and multiculturalism in New Zealand: A social psychological analysis. International Migration Review, 42(1), 227-248.
补充文件

