Ideal and Real Multiculturalism in Post-Soviet Countries: Relationship with Mutual Acculturation and Psychological Well-Being among Ethnic Majorities and Minorities

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The article presents a socio-psychological view of multiculturalism as a subjective reflection of the sociocultural context at the level of attitudes and perceptions. The concepts of ideal (expected) and real (perceived) multiculturalism are distinguished and studied in relationship with acculturation preferences and psychological well-being among members of ethnic minority and majority groups. The study was conducted on members of the Russian ethnic minority ( N = 746) and the ethnic majorities ( N = 754) of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Estonia. The total sample size was 1,500 respondents. The methodological tools included prescriptive and descriptive versions of The Multicultural Ideology Scale (MIS) , The Acculturation Strategies Scale for Ethnic Minorities , The Acculturation Expectations Scale for Ethnic Majorities , The Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) , and The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) . The analysis revealed that the universal basis for life satisfaction among members of the Russian ethnic minority and the ethnic majorities in all the post-Soviet countries studied was real (perceived) multiculturalism but not abstract attitudes towards the adoption of multicultural ideology. Moreover, real multiculturalism, as perceived by the Russian minority, also serves as a universal basis for their choice of the integration strategy in intercultural interactions with members of the ethnic majority. But for the members of the ethnic majority, real multiculturalism in their perception manifests itself as a basis for the integration or assimilation of the Russians, depending on the context: thus, the Kazakhs and Kyrgyz tend toward the former, while the Estonians tend toward the latter. These and other findings are discussed within the sociocultural contexts of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Estonia, as well as within the core differences between ideal and real multiculturalism. The article concludes with an exploration of the practical value of the tested model for diagnosing intercultural relations in multicultural societies.

About the authors

Zarina Kh. Lepshokova

HSE University

Author for correspondence.
Email: taimiris@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3387-8242
SPIN-code: 7011-5082

PhD in Psychology, Associate Professor, Department of Psychology, Chief Research Fellow, Center for Sociocultural Research

20 Myasnitskaya Str., 101000 Moscow, Russian Federation

Jelena Djukic

Academy for Human Development

Email: jelenagent@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0001-7123-2058

PhD in Psychology, Associate Professor

34 Terazije Str., 11000 Belgrade, Serbia

Anna V. Chernaya

Southern Federal University

Email: avchernaya@sfedu.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5985-2126

Doctor of Psychology, Professor, Head of the Department of Developmental Psychology

105/42 B. Sadovaya Str., 344006 Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation

References

  1. Badea, C. (2017). Group ideologies. In F.M. Moghaddam (Ed.). The SAGE Encyclopedia of Political Behavior (vol. 2, pp. 345-345). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483391144.n159
  2. Berry, J.W. (2005). Acculturation: Living successfully in two cultures. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29(6), 697-712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2005.07.013
  3. Berry, J.W. (2013). Research on multiculturalism in Canada. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 37(6), 663-675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2013.09.005
  4. Berry, J.W. (Ed.). (2017). Mutual Intercultural Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316875032
  5. Berry, J.W., & Kalin, R. (1995). Multicultural and ethnic attitudes in Canada: An overview of the 1991 National Survey. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue Canadienne Des Sciences Du Comportement, 27(3), 301-320. https://doi.org/10.1037/0008-400x.27.3.301
  6. Berry, J.W., & Sabatier, C. (2010). Acculturation, discrimination, and adaptation among second generation immigrant youth in Montreal and Paris. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 34(3), 191-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2009.11.007
  7. Berry, J.W., Galyapina, V.N., Lebedeva, N.M., Lepshokova, Z.Kh., & Ryabichenko, T.A. (2019). Intercultural relations in Georgia and Tajikistan: A post-conflict model. Psychology. Journal of Higher School of Economics, 16(2), 232-249. https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2019-2-232-249
  8. Berry, J.W., Lepshokova, Z., MIRIPS Collaboration, & Grigoryev, D. (2022). How shall we all live together?: Meta-analytical review of the mutual intercultural relations in plural societies project. Applied Psychology, 71(3), 1014-1041. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12332
  9. Birman, D., Trickett, E.J., & Vinokurov, A. (2002). Acculturation and adaptation of Soviet Jewish refugee adolescents: Predictors of adjustment across life domains. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30(5), 585-607. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1016323213871
  10. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1992). Ecological systems theory. In R. Vasta (Ed.). Six theories of child development: Revised formulations and current issues (pp. 187-249). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
  11. Commercio, M.E. (2004). Exit in the near abroad: The Russian minorities in Latvia and Kyrgyzstan. Problems of post-Communism, 51(6), 23-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2004.11052185
  12. Croft, J. (2016). Non-citizens in Estonia and Latvia: Time for change in changing times? In IFSH (Ed.). OSCE Yearbook 2015 (pp. 181-195). Baden-Baden: Nomos. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845273655-177
  13. Dobrokhleb, V.G., & Kondakova, N.A. (2022). Gender component of the demographic security of the EAEU countries. Woman in Russian Society, (S1), 4-18. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21064/WinRS.2022.0.1
  14. Dzhamankulov, B.S. (2019). Structural changes in the economy of Kyrgyzstan. Ekonomicheskie otnosheniya, 9(2), 819-832. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18334/eo.9.2.40644
  15. Florin, M. (2011). Elites, Russian language and Soviet identity in post-Soviet Kyrgyzstan. Neprikosnovennyi zapas: debaty o politike i kul'ture, (6), 225-233. (In Russ.)
  16. Furman, D.E., & Zadorozhnyuk, E.G. (2004). Attraction of the Baltic countries (Baltic Russians and Baltic cultures). Universe of Russia, 13(3), 98-130. (In Russ.)
  17. Galiyev, A.A. (2016). Reflection of Soviet history in the memory policy of modern Kazakhstan. World of Great Altai, 2(3-1), 430-440. (In Russ.)
  18. Guimond, S., Crisp, R.J., De Oliveira, P., Kamiejski, R., Kteily, N., Kuepper, B., Lalonde, R.N., Levin, S., Pratto, F., Tougas, F., Sidanius, J., & Zick, A. (2013). Diversity policy, social dominance, and intergroup relations: Predicting prejudice in changing social and political contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(6), 941-958. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032069
  19. Jackson, P.I., & Doerschler, P. (2016). How safe do majority group members, ethnic minorities, and Muslims feel in multicultural European societies? Democracy and Security, 12(4), 247-277. https://doi.org/10.1080/17419166.2016.1213165
  20. Jumageldinov, A. (2014). Ethnic identification, social discrimination and interethnic relations in Kazakhstan. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 114, 410-414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.721
  21. Koopmans, R., & Schaeffer, M. (2016). Statistical and perceived diversity and their impacts on neighborhood social cohesion in Germany, France and the Netherlands. Social Indicators Research, 125(3), 853-883. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-0863-3 Kruusvall, J., Vetik, R., & Berry, J.W. (2009). The strategies of inter-ethnic adaptation of Estonian Russians. Studies of Transition States and Societies, 1(1), 3-24.
  22. Kunst, J.R., Coenen, A.-C., Gundersen, A., & Obaidi, M. (2023). How are acculturation orientations associated among majority-group members? The moderating role of ideology and levels of identity. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 96, 101857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2023.101857
  23. Kus-Harbord, L., & Ward, C. (2015). Ethnic Russians in post-Soviet Estonia: Perceived devaluation, acculturation, well-being, and ethnic attitudes. International Perspectives in Psychology, 4(1), 66-81. https://doi.org/10.1037/ipp0000025
  24. Kuvalin, D.B., Borisov, V.N., Zinchenko, Yu.V., & Lavrinenko, P.A. (2022). The economy of Kazakhstan: the results of a difficult thirty years. Territory Development, (1), 22-32. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32324/2412-8945-2022-1-22-32
  25. Lebedeva, N.M., & Tatarko, A.N. (Eds.). (2009). Strategies for intercultural interaction between migrants and the host population of Russia. Moscow: RUDN University. (In Russ.)
  26. Leping, K.-O., & Toomet, O. (2008). Emerging ethnic wage gap: Estonia during political and economic transition. Journal of Comparative Economics, 36(4), 599-619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2008.08.002
  27. Lepshokova, Z., Lebedeva, N., & van de Vijver, F.J.R. (2018). The mediating role of identity incompatibility in the relationship between perceived discrimination and acculturation preferences in two generations of the ethnic Russian minority in the North Caucasus. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 15(1), 99-114. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2017.1336433
  28. Lepshokova, Z.Kh. (2012). Adaptation strategies of migrants and their psychological well-being (using the example of Moscow and the North Caucasus). Moscow: Grifon. (In Russ.)
  29. Lepshokova, Z.Kh. (2020). Perceived inclusiveness of the social context, acculturation and adaptation of migrants from the north Caucasus in Moscow. Social Sciences and Contemporary World, (3), 124-138. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31857/S086904990010074-3
  30. Lepshokova, Z.Kh. (2021). Perceived inclusiveness of the context, identities and acculturation of Russians in Kyrgyzstan and Estonia. Cultural-Historical Psychology, 17(4), 25-33. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2021170403
  31. Lepshokova, Z.Kh., & Tatarko, A.N. (2016). Intercultural relations in Kabardino-Balkaria: Does integration always lead to subjective well-being? Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 9(1), 57-73. https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2016.0104
  32. Lindemann, K., & Vöörmann, R. (2010). Second generation Russians in the Estonian labour market. In R. Vöörmann (Ed.). Estonian Human Development Report 2009 (Pp. 99-102). Tallinn: Estonian Cooperation Assembly.
  33. Moldabayeva, A.K., & Zeynelgabdin, A.B. (2024). Analysis of the mechanisms of regulation of the language policy of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Bulletin of the Karaganda University, 29(1), 159-170. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31489/2024ec1/159-170
  34. Nemeshina, L.Yu., Omarov, H.M., & Panarin, S.A. (2008). Russians of Kyrgyzstan in the 1990-2000s: population dynamics, qualitative shifts, adaptation assessment. Acta Eurasica, (3), 47-75. (In Russ.)
  35. Nguyen, A.-M.D., & Benet-Martínez, V. (2013). Biculturalism and adjustment: A meta-analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44(1), 122-159. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022111435097
  36. Pavlenko, A. (2008). Multilingualism in post-Soviet countries: Language revival, language removal, and sociolinguistic theory. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 11(3-4), 275-314. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050802271517
  37. Raudsepp, M. (2009). Ethnic self-esteem and intergroup attitudes among the Estonian majority and the non-Estonian minority. Studies of Transition States and Societies, 1(1), 36-51.
  38. Rudmin, F.W. (2006). Debate in science: The case of acculturation. AnthroGlobe Journal, 1-98. Retrieved 04.01.2023 from https://munin.uit.no/bitstream/handle/10037/1996/article.pdf?sequence=1
  39. Scottham, K.M., & Dias, R.H. (2010). Acculturative strategies and the psycho- logical adaptation of Brazilian migrants to Japan. Identity, 10(4), 284-303. https://doi.org/10.1080/15283488.2010.523587
  40. Shulga, Ye.P. (2013). Potential migration of the Russian speakers from central Asia to Russia (in terms of Kyrgyzstan). Bulletin of Surgut State Pedagogical University, (3), 97-103. (In Russ.)
  41. Skuratovskaya, K.G. (2016). The current situation of the Russian ethnic group in Estonia: political analysis. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg State University. Political science. International relations, (1), 85-96. (In Russ.)
  42. Stogianni, M., Bender, M., Sleegers, W., Benet-Martinez, V., & Nguyen, A.-M. (2021). Sample characteristics and country level indicators influencing the relationship between biculturalism and adjustment: an updated meta-analysis. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/8qymv
  43. Tran, D.L. (2013). Multilingual Education - Important Strategy of Kazakhstan. Advances in Current Natural Sciences, (7), 130-132. (In Russ.)
  44. Van Assche, J., Roets, A., Dhont, K., & Van Hiel, A. (2016). The association between actual and perceived ethnic diversity: The moderating role of authoritarianism and implications for outgroup threat, anxiety, and mistrust. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46(7), 807-817. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2211
  45. Vetik, R. (1993). Ethnic conflict and accommodation in post-communist Estonia. Journal of Peace Research, 30(3), 271-280. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343393030003003
  46. Ward, C., Stuart, J., & Watters, S.M. (2016). Multiculturalism: The cause of social problems or the cure for social ills? Papers presented at the SPSSI-SASP Small Group Meeting on Immigration to Major Immigrant-receiving Countries. Ottawa, Canada.
  47. Ward, C., Gale, J., Staerklé, C., & Stuart, J. (2018). Immigration and multiculturalism in context: A framework for psychological research. Journal of Social Issues, 74(4), 833-855. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12301
  48. Ward, C., Kim, I., Karl, J.A., Epstein, S., & Park, H.-J. (2020). How normative multiculturalism relates to immigrant well-being. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 26(4), 581-591. https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000317
  49. Ward, C., Stuart, J., & Karl, J.A. (2023). A socio-ecological perspective on psychological well-being in a culturally diverse context: The role of perceived national multicultural norms. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 96, 101870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2023.101870
  50. Zagefka, H., & Brown, R. (2002). The relationship between acculturation strategies, relative fit and intergroup relations: Immigrant-majority relations in Germany. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32(2), 171-188. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.73

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Согласие на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика»

1. Я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных»), осуществляя использование сайта https://journals.rcsi.science/ (далее – «Сайт»), подтверждая свою полную дееспособность даю согласие на обработку персональных данных с использованием средств автоматизации Оператору - федеральному государственному бюджетному учреждению «Российский центр научной информации» (РЦНИ), далее – «Оператор», расположенному по адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А, со следующими условиями.

2. Категории обрабатываемых данных: файлы «cookies» (куки-файлы). Файлы «cookie» – это небольшой текстовый файл, который веб-сервер может хранить в браузере Пользователя. Данные файлы веб-сервер загружает на устройство Пользователя при посещении им Сайта. При каждом следующем посещении Пользователем Сайта «cookie» файлы отправляются на Сайт Оператора. Данные файлы позволяют Сайту распознавать устройство Пользователя. Содержимое такого файла может как относиться, так и не относиться к персональным данным, в зависимости от того, содержит ли такой файл персональные данные или содержит обезличенные технические данные.

3. Цель обработки персональных данных: анализ пользовательской активности с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика».

4. Категории субъектов персональных данных: все Пользователи Сайта, которые дали согласие на обработку файлов «cookie».

5. Способы обработки: сбор, запись, систематизация, накопление, хранение, уточнение (обновление, изменение), извлечение, использование, передача (доступ, предоставление), блокирование, удаление, уничтожение персональных данных.

6. Срок обработки и хранения: до получения от Субъекта персональных данных требования о прекращении обработки/отзыва согласия.

7. Способ отзыва: заявление об отзыве в письменном виде путём его направления на адрес электронной почты Оператора: info@rcsi.science или путем письменного обращения по юридическому адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А

8. Субъект персональных данных вправе запретить своему оборудованию прием этих данных или ограничить прием этих данных. При отказе от получения таких данных или при ограничении приема данных некоторые функции Сайта могут работать некорректно. Субъект персональных данных обязуется сам настроить свое оборудование таким способом, чтобы оно обеспечивало адекватный его желаниям режим работы и уровень защиты данных файлов «cookie», Оператор не предоставляет технологических и правовых консультаций на темы подобного характера.

9. Порядок уничтожения персональных данных при достижении цели их обработки или при наступлении иных законных оснований определяется Оператором в соответствии с законодательством Российской Федерации.

10. Я согласен/согласна квалифицировать в качестве своей простой электронной подписи под настоящим Согласием и под Политикой обработки персональных данных выполнение мною следующего действия на сайте: https://journals.rcsi.science/ нажатие мною на интерфейсе с текстом: «Сайт использует сервис «Яндекс.Метрика» (который использует файлы «cookie») на элемент с текстом «Принять и продолжить».