The Permeability of Social Boundaries for Russians in the Post-Soviet Space: The Role of Social Identities and Perceived Security

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Russians are one of the largest ethnocultural minorities in the post-Soviet and the issue of their inclusion in the societies of host countries remains relevant. Therefore, this study was focused on the relationship between perceived security and social identities (civic, ethnic or European) and the perceived permeability of social boundaries for Russians in Armenia, Kazakhstan, Estonia, and Kyrgyzstan. The study had a cross-sectional design. The data were collected online in 2020-2022, from samples of Russian minorities in these countries (total N = 765, including: 145 Russians in Armenia, 133 Russians in Kazakhstan, 186 Russians in Estonia, and 300 Russians in Kyrgyzstan) using the scales of ethnic identity, civic identity and perceived security from the questionnaire of the international MIRIPS project, the scale of European identity developed by K. Velkova, and the scale of permeability of social boundaries by M. Ramos et al. Path models were built to test the hypothesis and find an answer to the research question. The analysis of regression coefficients, as well as direct and indirect effects in the path models, demonstrated a universal positive relationship between perceived security and the perceived permeability of social boundaries for the Russians. The inclusiveness or exclusiveness of a particular identity was found to be culture-specific. Civic identity contributes to the perceived permeability of social boundaries in Armenia, Kazakhstan, and Kyrgyzstan. European identity impedes perceived it in Kazakhstan. Ethnic identity promotes it in Kazakhstan but hinders it in Estonia (at tendency level). In a number of countries, significant mediation effects of ethnic (Estonia), civic (Kazakhstan and Armenia), and European (Kazakhstan) identities were found. The results were discussed in relation to the structural characteristics of the socio-cultural contexts of the studied countries. It was concluded that perceived security would affect the inclusiveness of the context in combination with social identities, depending on the characteristics of the sociocultural context.

About the authors

Maria A. Bultseva

HSE University

Author for correspondence.
Email: mbultseva@hse.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5899-9916
SPIN-code: 5293-2730

PhD in Psychology, Research Fellow, Centre of Sociocultural Research

20 Myasnitskaya St, Moscow, 101000, Russian Federation

Asya S. Berberyan

Russian-Armenian (Slavonic) University

Email: aspsy@inbox.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0321-0161
SPIN-code: 4171-8178

Doctor of Psychology, Professor

123 Hovsep Emin St, 0051, Yerevan, Armenia

Sonia A. Berrios Callejas

HSE University

Email: soniaberrios@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9572-2289

PhD student, Research Intern, Centre of Sociocultural Research

20 Myasnitskaya St, Moscow, 101000, Russian Federation

References

  1. Agadjanian, V. (2020). Exclusion, violence, and optimism: Ethnic divides in Kyrgyzstan. Ethnicities, 20(3), 457-480. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796819835657
  2. Albert, R., Schneeweis, A., & Knobbe, I. (2005). Strengthening, hiding or relinquishing ethnic identity in response to threat: Implications for intercultural relations. Intercultural Communication Studies, 14(1), 107-118.
  3. Bayadyan, H. (2007). Soviet Armenian identity and cultural representation. In D. Tsypylma & W. Kaschuba (Eds.). Representations on the Margins of Europe: Politics and Identities in the Baltic and South Caucasian States (pp. 198-212). Frankfurt, New York: Campus Verlag.
  4. Baydhowi, B., Purwono, U., Prathama Siswadi, A.G., Ali, M.M., Syahputra, W., & Iskandar, T.Z. (2023). Perception of threat and national identity: Investigation of the mediating role of collective self esteem. Heliyon, 9(6), e17207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17207
  5. Berry, J.W. (2013). Intercultural relations in plural societies: Research derived from multiculturalism policy. Acta de Investigación Psicológica, 3(2), 1122-1135. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2007-4719(13)70956-6
  6. Berry, J.W. (Ed.). (2017). MIRIPS Questionnaire. In Mutual Intercultural Relations (pp. 375-387). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316875032.019
  7. Berry, J.W., Galyapina, V.N., Lebedeva, N.M., Lepshokova, Z.Kh., & Ryabichenko, T.A. (2019). Intercultural relations in Georgia and Tajikistan: A post-conflict model. Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 16(2), 232-249. https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2019-2-232-249
  8. Bourguignon, D., Yzerbyt, V.Y., Teixeira, C.P., & Herman, G. (2015). When does it hurt? Intergroup permeability moderates the link between discrimination and self-esteem. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(1), 3-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2083
  9. Breidahl, K.N., & Gustavsson, G. (2022). Can we trust the natives? Exploring the relationship between national identity and trust among immigrants and their descendants in Denmark. Nations and Nationalism, 28(2), 592-611. https://doi.org/10.1111/nana.12834
  10. Bultseva, М.А., Bushina, Е.V., Berberyan, А.S., Kodja, Е.А. (2021). The role of Soviet identity in the relationship of multiculturalism and boundaries permeability for Russians in Armenia. Cultural-Historical Psychology, 17(4) 56-64. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2021170406
  11. Curtis, K.A. (2014). Inclusive versus exclusive: A cross-national comparison of the effects of subnational, national, and supranational identity. European Union Politics, 15(4), 521-546. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116514528058
  12. Chotayeva Ch. (2013). Ethnic tension in Kyrgyzstan in the post-conflict period: Ethnosociological survey results. Central Asia and the Caucasus, 16(1), 17-39.
  13. Dinesen, P.T., & Sønderskov, K.M. (2015). Ethnic diversity and social trust: Evidence from the micro-context. American Sociological Review, 80(3), 550-573. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122415577989
  14. Echabe, A.E., & Gonzales Castro, J.L. (1996). Images of immigrants: a study on the xenophobia and permeability of intergroup boundaries. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26(3), 341-352. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-0992(199605)26:3<341::aid-ejsp753>3.0.co;2-4
  15. Gaertner, S.L., & Dovidio, J.F. (2005). Understanding and addressing contemporary racism: From aversive racism to the common ingroup identity model. Journal of Social Issues, 61(3), 615-639. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2005.00424.x
  16. Galyapina, V., Lepshokova, Z., & Molodikova, I. (2021). Intercultural relations in Dagestan: The role of perceived security, intercultural contacts, and mutual acculturation. Central Asia and The Caucasus, 22(1), 75-90. https://doi.org/10.37178/ca-c.21.1.07
  17. Galyapina, V.N. (2021). Acculturation attitudes and psychological well-being of Russians in Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan: The moderating role of perceived security. Cultural-Historical Psychology, 17(4), 34-45. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2021170404
  18. Johnson, D., Terry, D.J., & Louis, W.R. (2005). Perceptions of the intergroup structure and anti-Asian prejudice among white Australians. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 8(1), 53-71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430205048616
  19. Kallas, K. (2016). Claiming the diaspora: Russia's compatriot policy and its reception by Estonian-Russian population. Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe, 15(3), 1-25.
  20. Karabec, D., & Kotenko, I. (2015). Russians and the role of the Russian language in Kazakhstan. Scientific readings name of professor N.E. Zhukovsky. Collection of scientific articles of the V International scientific and practical conference (pp. 71-76). Krasnodar: Publishing house - South. (In Russ.)
  21. Kodja, E.A., Lebedeva, N.M., Galyapina, V.N., Lepshokova, Z.Kh., & Ryabichenko, T.A. (2019). Intercultural relations in Russian Crimea: empirical testing of three hypotheses. Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 16(2), 250-268. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2019-2-250-268
  22. Kruusvall, J., Vetik, R., & Berry, J.W. (2009). The strategies of inter-ethnic adaptation of Estonian Russians. Studies of Transition States and Societies, 1(1), 3-24.
  23. Kurkchiyan, M., & Herzig, E. (2004). Introduction: Armenia and the Armenians. In Herzig, E., & Kurkchiyan, M. (Eds.). The Armenians: Past and Present in the Making of National Identity (pp. 1-22). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203004937
  24. Kus, L., Liu, J., & Ward, C. (2013). Relative deprivation versus system justification: Polemical social representations and identity positioning in a post-Soviet society. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43(5), 423-437. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1958
  25. Laitin, D.D. (2003). Three models of integration and the Estonian/Russian reality. Journal of Baltic Studies, 34(2), 197-222. https://doi.org/10.1080/01629770300000041
  26. Lebedeva, N.M., & Tatarko, A.N. (Eds.). (2009). Strategies for the intercultural interaction of migrants and the population of Russia. Moscow: RUDN University. (In Russ.)
  27. Lebedeva, N.M., Tatarko, A.N., & Berry, J. (2016). Intercultural relations in Russia and Latvia: The relationship between contact and cultural security. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 9(1), 41-56. https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2016.0103
  28. Lepshokova, Z.Kh., & Lebedeva, N.M. (2022). Inclusive and exclusive identities of representatives of different peoples of Russia: the role of basic values. In V.K. Levashov, N.G. Khairullina (Eds.). All-Russian civil identity: results of the survey of Tyumen youth (pp. 90-105). Tyumen: Industrial University of Tyumen. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.46320/9785-9961-2950-8-2022-6-1-17
  29. Letnyakov, D.E. (2019). Cultural diversity management in the post-soviet countries: “Nationalizing states” 30 years later. South-Russian Journal of Social Sciences, 20(2), 16-33. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-20-2-16-33
  30. Loh, J.(M).I., Lloyd D. Restubog, S., & Gallois, C. (2010). Attitudinal outcomes of boundary permeability: A comparison of Australian and Singaporean employees. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 17(2), 118-134. https://doi.org/10.1108/13527601021038697
  31. Matonytė, I., & Morkevičius, V. (2009). Threat perception and European identity building: The case of elites in Belgium, Germany, Lithuania and Poland. Europe-Asia Studies, 61(6), 967-985. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668130903063492
  32. Melich, J., & Adibayeva, A. (2013). National building and cultural policy in Kazakhstan. European Scientific Journal, 2, 265-279.
  33. MM, D. (2019). Managing cultural diversity: Inclusive and exclusive approaches. World Affairs: The Journal of International Issues, 23(4), 26-35.
  34. Morrison, K.R., Plaut, V.C., & Ybarra, O. (2010). Predicting whether multiculturalism positively or negatively influences White Americans’ intergroup attitudes: The role of ethnic identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(12), 1648-1661. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210386118
  35. Muhitdenova, A.T., & Aқbolat, D.E. (2015). Inter-ethnic relations in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Journal of Philosophy, Culture and Political Science, 50(1), 158-167. (In Kazakh)
  36. Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS Survival Manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS (7th ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press/McGraw-Hill. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003117452
  37. Peyrouse, S. (2007). Nationhood and the minority question in Central Asia. The Russians in Kazakhstan. Europe-Asia Studies, 59(3), 481-501. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668130701239930
  38. Piontkowski, U., Florack, A., Hoelker, P., & Obdrzálek, P. (2000). Predicting acculturation attitudes of dominant and non-dominant groups. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 24(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0147-1767(99)00020-6
  39. Ramos, M.R., Cassidy, C., Reicher, S., & Haslam, S.A. (2016). A longitudinal study of the effects of discrimination on the acculturation strategies of international students. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47(3), 401-420. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022116628672
  40. Schulze, I. (2017). A typology of ethnic minorities in Armenia. Iran and the Caucasus, 21(4), 362-375. https://doi.org/10.1163/1573384x-20170403
  41. Shlapentokh, D. (2018). Estonian Russians: The success story of integration. Trames. Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 22(3), 231-238. https://doi.org/10.3176/tr.2018.3.01
  42. Stephan, W.G., Lausanne Renfro, C., Esses, V.M., White Stephan, C., & Martin, T. (2005). The effects of feeling threatened on attitudes toward immigrants. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2005.04.011
  43. Stone, C.H., & Crisp, R.J. (2007). Superordinate and subgroup identification as predictors of intergroup evaluation in common ingroup contexts. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10(4), 493-513. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430207081537
  44. Svinchukova, E.G. (2012). Russians in Kazakhstan: the influence of Kazakh culture on language consciousness of Russian diaspora. Journal of psycholinguistics, (15), 146-155. (In Russ.)
  45. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J.C. (2004). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In Jost, J.T., & Sidanius, J. (Eds.). Political Psychology: Key Readings (pp. 276-293). New York: Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203505984-16
  46. Velkova, K. (2020). Multiple identities of Russians and Bulgarians: Intercultural comparison. Psychological Studies, 13(73), 6. https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v13i73.174
  47. Verkuyten, M., & Reijerse, A. (2008). Intergroup structure and identity management among ethnic minority and majority groups: The interactive effects of perceived stability, legitimacy, and permeability. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(1), 106-127. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.395
  48. Vetik, R., & Helemäe, J. (Eds.). (2011). The Russian Second Generation in Tallinn and Kohtla-Järve: The TIES Study in Estonia. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. https://doi.org/10.5117/9789089642509
  49. Ward, C. (2024). Down the rabbit hole: Acculturation, integration and adaptation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 100, 101978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2024.101978
  50. Włodarska-Frykowska, A. (2016). Ethnic Russian minority in Estonia. International Studies. Interdisciplinary Political and Cultural Journal, 18(2), 153-164. https://doi.org/10.1515/ipcj-2016-0015
  51. Zhang, X., Zheng, J., Liu, L., Zhao, X., & Sun, X. (2014). The effect of group boundary permeability on intergroup prejudice: The case of Rural-to-Urban migrants in China. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 8(2), 53-61. https://doi.org/10.1017/prp.2014.7
  52. Zinchenko, Yu.P., Zotova, O.Yu., & Tarasova, L.V. (2019). The status of ethnic identity and psychological security of personality. Psychology of Subculture: Phenomeno- logy and Contemporary Tendencies of Development. The European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences, vol. 64 (pp. 799-808). London: Future Academy. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2019.07.104

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Согласие на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика»

1. Я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных»), осуществляя использование сайта https://journals.rcsi.science/ (далее – «Сайт»), подтверждая свою полную дееспособность даю согласие на обработку персональных данных с использованием средств автоматизации Оператору - федеральному государственному бюджетному учреждению «Российский центр научной информации» (РЦНИ), далее – «Оператор», расположенному по адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А, со следующими условиями.

2. Категории обрабатываемых данных: файлы «cookies» (куки-файлы). Файлы «cookie» – это небольшой текстовый файл, который веб-сервер может хранить в браузере Пользователя. Данные файлы веб-сервер загружает на устройство Пользователя при посещении им Сайта. При каждом следующем посещении Пользователем Сайта «cookie» файлы отправляются на Сайт Оператора. Данные файлы позволяют Сайту распознавать устройство Пользователя. Содержимое такого файла может как относиться, так и не относиться к персональным данным, в зависимости от того, содержит ли такой файл персональные данные или содержит обезличенные технические данные.

3. Цель обработки персональных данных: анализ пользовательской активности с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика».

4. Категории субъектов персональных данных: все Пользователи Сайта, которые дали согласие на обработку файлов «cookie».

5. Способы обработки: сбор, запись, систематизация, накопление, хранение, уточнение (обновление, изменение), извлечение, использование, передача (доступ, предоставление), блокирование, удаление, уничтожение персональных данных.

6. Срок обработки и хранения: до получения от Субъекта персональных данных требования о прекращении обработки/отзыва согласия.

7. Способ отзыва: заявление об отзыве в письменном виде путём его направления на адрес электронной почты Оператора: info@rcsi.science или путем письменного обращения по юридическому адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А

8. Субъект персональных данных вправе запретить своему оборудованию прием этих данных или ограничить прием этих данных. При отказе от получения таких данных или при ограничении приема данных некоторые функции Сайта могут работать некорректно. Субъект персональных данных обязуется сам настроить свое оборудование таким способом, чтобы оно обеспечивало адекватный его желаниям режим работы и уровень защиты данных файлов «cookie», Оператор не предоставляет технологических и правовых консультаций на темы подобного характера.

9. Порядок уничтожения персональных данных при достижении цели их обработки или при наступлении иных законных оснований определяется Оператором в соответствии с законодательством Российской Федерации.

10. Я согласен/согласна квалифицировать в качестве своей простой электронной подписи под настоящим Согласием и под Политикой обработки персональных данных выполнение мною следующего действия на сайте: https://journals.rcsi.science/ нажатие мною на интерфейсе с текстом: «Сайт использует сервис «Яндекс.Метрика» (который использует файлы «cookie») на элемент с текстом «Принять и продолжить».