The Role of Interpersonal and Intergroup Attitudes in Interaction Strategies of Russian and Tajik Students in Tajikistan

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

详细

The aim of this paper is to examine the role of interpersonal (liking, disliking and interpersonal trust) and intergroup attitudes (trust towards both Russians and Tajiks, social distance to both Russians and Tajiks) in interaction strategies (cooperation and competition) of students of Tajikistan. To this end, the authors conducted a correlation study in a Russian-language school in Tajikistan with both Russian and Tajik students. Data were collected using self-report measures of trust, social distance and interaction strategies, as well as sociometric indexes of liking and disliking. The sample consisted of Russians ( N = 51, males = 51%) and Tajiks ( N = 74, males = 60%) from 9th to 11th grades. The mean age of the sample was 16.20 ( SD = 0.86). For the Tajik students, as representatives of the ethnic majority, the intergroup attitudes were identified as important factors in choosing the interaction strategies. High perceived school status and lower cultural distance with Russians facilitated competition. For the Russian students, as representatives of an ethnic minority, the interpersonal attitudes turned out to be significant predictors of the interaction strategies. Thus, a high index of disliking and interpersonal trust, high perceived school status contributed to cooperation with classmates. The results of the study are discussed at the end of the article.

作者简介

Ekaterina Bushina

HSE University

Email: evbushina@hse.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9560-9609
SPIN 代码: 6526-9176

PhD in Psychology, Leading Research Fellow, Center of Sociocultural Research

20 Myasnitskaya St, 101000 Moscow, Russian Federation

Azkhariya Karimova

HSE University

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: amuminova@hse.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1973-9414

PhD student, Research Intern, Center of Sociocultural Research

20 Myasnitskaya St, 101000 Moscow, Russian Federation

参考

  1. Acedo-Carmona, C., & Gomila, A. (2019). Personal trust extends cooperation beyond trustees: A Mexican study. International Journal of Psychology, 54(5), 687-704. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12500
  2. Adachi, P.J.C., Hodson, G., Willoughby, T., Blank, C., & Ha, A. (2016). From outgroups to allied forces: Effect of intergroup cooperation in violent and nonviolent video games on boosting favorable outgroup attitudes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(3), 259-265. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000145
  3. Akerlof, G.A. (1997). Social distance and social decisions. Econometrica, 65(5), 1005-1027. https://doi.org/10.2307/2171877
  4. Ayers, T.S., Sandier, I.N., West, S.G., & Roosa, M.W. (1996). A dispositional and situational assessment of children’s coping: Testing alternative models of coping. Journal of Personality, 64(4), 923-958. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1996.tb00949.x
  5. Bell, A.N., Smith, D.S., & Juvonen, J. (2021). Interpersonal attitudes toward cross-ethnic peers in diverse middle schools: Implications for intergroup attitudes. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(1), 88-107. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430219888020
  6. Binzel, C., & Fehr, D. (2013). Social distance and trust: Experimental evidence from a slum in Cairo. Journal of Development Economics, 103, 99-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2013.01.009
  7. Bogardus, E.S. (1958). Racial distance changes in the United States during the past 30 years. Sociology & Social Research, 43, 127-134.
  8. Bowles, S. (2006). Group competition, reproductive leveling, and the evolution of human altruism. Science, 314(5805), 1569-1572. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1134829
  9. Burton-Chellew, M.N., Ross-Gillespie, A., & West, S.A. (2010). Cooperation in humans: competition between groups and proximate emotions. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(2), 104-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.07.005
  10. Cairns, R.B., Cairns, B.D., Neckerman, H.J., Gest, S.D., & Gariépy, J.-L. (1988). Social networks and aggressive behavior: Peer support or peer rejection? Developmental Psychology, 24(6), 815-823. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.24.6.815
  11. Case, C.R., Conlon, K.E., & Maner, J.K. (2015). Affiliation-seeking among the powerless: Lacking power increases social affiliative motivation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(3), 378-385. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2089
  12. Chen, R., & Chen, Y. (2011). The potential of social identity for equilibrium selection. American Economic Review, 101(6), 2562-2589. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.6.2562
  13. Coleman, P.T., Deutsch, M., & Marcus, E.C. (Eds.). (2014). The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass/Wiley.
  14. Compas, B.E., Connor-Smith, J.K., Saltzman, H., Thomsen, A.H., & Wadsworth, M.E. (2001). Coping with stress during childhood and adolescence: Problems, progress, and potential in theory and research. Psychological Bulletin, 127(1), 87-127. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.127.1.87
  15. Cooley, S., Burkholder, A.R., & Killen, M. (2019). Social inclusion and exclusion in same-race and interracial peer encounters. Developmental Psychology, 55(11), 2440-2450. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000810
  16. Crandall, C.S., & Warner, R.H. (2005). How a prejudice is recognized. Psychological Inquiry, 16(2-3), 137-141.
  17. Engelmann, J.M., Over, H., Herrmann, E., & Tomasello, M. (2013). Young children care more about their reputation with ingroup members and potential reciprocators. Developmental Science, 16(6), 952-958. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12086
  18. Evans, C., & Eder, D. (1993). “NO EXIT”: Processes of social isolation in the middle school. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 22(2), 139-170. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124193022002001
  19. Galchenko, I., & van de Vijver, F.J.R. (2007). The role of perceived cultural distance in the acculturation of exchange students in Russia. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 31(2), 181-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2006.03.004
  20. Gee, L.K., Schreck, M.J., & Singh, A. (2020). From lab to field: Social distance and charitable giving in teams. Economics Letters, 192, 109128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2020.109128
  21. Gelb, R., & Jacobson, J.L. (1988). Popular and unpopular children’s interactions during cooperative and competitive peer group activities. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 16(3), 247-261. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00913798
  22. Gieling, M., Thijs, J., & Verkuyten, M. (2010). Tolerance of practices by Muslim actors: An integrative social-developmental perspective. Child Development, 81(5), 1384-1399. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01480.x
  23. Johnson, D.W., & Ahlgren, A. (1976). Relationship between student attitudes about cooperation and competition and attitudes toward schooling. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68(1), 92-102. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.68.1.92
  24. Johnson, D.W., Maruyama, G., Johnson, R., Nelson, D., & Skon, L. (1981). Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on achievement: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 89(1), 47-62. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.89.1.47
  25. Kelley, H.H., & Thibaut, J.W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York, NY: Wiley.
  26. La Greca, A.M., & Harrison, H.M. (2005). Adolescent peer relations, friendships, and romantic relationships: Do they predict social anxiety and depression? Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 34(1), 49-61. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15374424jccp3401_5
  27. Lammers, J., Dubois, D., Rucker, D.D., & Galinsky, A.D. (2013). Power gets the job: Priming power improves interview outcomes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(4), 776-779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.02.008
  28. Lebedeva, N.M. (2022). Ethnopsychology. Textbook and practice for academic bachelor's degree. Moscow: Yurait. (In Russ.)
  29. Lebedeva, N.M., & Tatatrko, A.N. (Eds.). (2009). Strategies for intercultural interaction between migrants and the Russian population. Moscow: RUDN University. (In Russ.)
  30. Lusher, D., Kremer, P., & Robins, G. (2013). Cooperative and competitive structures of trust relations in teams. Small Group Research, 45(1), 3-36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496413510362
  31. Martsinkovskaya, T.D. (1997). Diagnostics of children's mental development. Moscow: Linka-press. (In Russ.)
  32. Moreno, J.L. (1951). Sociometry, Experimental Method and the Science of Society. Beacon, NY: Beacon House Inc.
  33. Morgan, P.L., Farkas, G., Hillemeier, M.M., & Maczuga, S. (2008). Risk factors for learning-related behavior problems at 24 months of age: Population-based estimates. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 37(3), 401-413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-008-9279-8
  34. Nikolaeva, L.Yu. (2015). The role of the Russians of Tajikistan in transforming Tajik society. Comparative Politics Russia, 6(2), 100-109. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18611/2221-3279-2015-6-2(19)-100-109
  35. Pettigrew, T.F., & Tropp, L.R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751-783. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
  36. Putnam, R.D. (2009). Diversity, social capital, and immigrant integration: Introductory remarks. National Civic Review, 98(1), 3-5. https://doi.org/10.1002/ncr.236
  37. Rachlin, H., & Jones, B.A. (2008). Altruism among relatives and non-relatives. Behavioural Processes, 79(2), 120-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2008.06.002
  38. Rahim, M.A., & Magner, N.R. (1994). Convergent and discriminant validity of the Rahim organizational conflict inventory-II. Psychological Reports, 74(1), 35-38. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1994.74.1.35
  39. Rigby, K. (2004). Addressing Bullying in Schools. School Psychology International, 25(3), 287-300. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034304046902
  40. Roseth, C.J., Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (2008). Promoting early adolescents’ achievement and peer relationships: The effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 223-246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.223
  41. Schellenberg, J.A. (1996). Conflict resolution: Theory, research, and practice. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  42. Schneider, B.H., Woodburn, S.S., Pilar Soteras del Toro, M. del, & Udvari, S.J. (2005). Cultural and gender differences in the implications of competition for earlyadolescent friendship. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 51(2), 163-191. https://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.2005.0013
  43. Sherif, M., White, B.J., & Harvey, O.J. (1955). Status in experimentally produced groups. American Journal of Sociology, 60(4), 370-379. https://doi.org/10.1086/221569
  44. Smith, K.A. (1996). Cooperative learning: Making “groupwork” work. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1996(67), 71-82. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.37219966709
  45. Steinkamp, M.W. (1990). The social concomitants of competitive and impatient/aggressive components of the Type A behavior pattern in preschool children: Peer responses and teacher utterances in a naturalistic setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1287-1295. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1287
  46. Tajfel, H., Billig, M.G., Bundy, R.P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1(2), 149-178. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420010202
  47. Tassi, F., & Schneider, B.H. (1997). Task-oriented versus other-referenced competition: Differential implications for children’s peer relations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27(17), 1557-1580. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1997.tb01613.x
  48. Tatarko, A.N., Lepshokova, Z.K., & Dubrov, D.I. (2019). Trust as a moderator of attitude towards ethnic diversity and acculturation expectations of the host population. Social Psychology and Society, 10(1), 92-114. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2019100106
  49. Titkova, V., Ivaniushina, V., & Alexandrov, D. (2017). Smart, Pretty or Independent: Who Is Popular at School? Educational Studies Moscow, (4), 171-198. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2017-4-171-198
  50. Tryon, A.S., & Keane, S.P. (1991). Popular and aggressive boys’ initial social interaction patterns in cooperative and competitive settings. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 19(4), 395-406. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00919085
  51. van der Linden, M., Hooghe, M., de Vroome, T., & Van Laar, C. (2017). Extending trust to immigrants: Generalized trust, cross-group friendship and anti- immigrant sentiments in 21 European societies. PLoS ONE, 12(5), e0177369. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177369
  52. Van Lange, P.A.M., Klapwijk, A., & Van Munster, L.M. (2011). How the shadow of the future might promote cooperation. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14(6), 857-870. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430211402102
  53. Van Oudenhoven, J.P., Groenewoud, J.T., & Hewstone, M. (1996). Cooperation, ethnic salience and generalization of interethnic attitudes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26(4), 649-661. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-0992(199607)26:4<649::aid-ejsp780>3.0.co;2-t
  54. Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., Munniksma, A., & Dijkstra, J.K. (2010). The complex relation between bullying, victimization, acceptance, and rejection: Giving special attention to status, affection, and sex differences. Child Development, 81(2), 480-486. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01411.x
  55. Wang, P., & Chen, L. (2012). The effects of sanction and social value orientation on trust and cooperation in public goods dilemmas. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 43(1), 52-64. https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1041.2011.00052
  56. Waytz, A., Chou, E.Y., Magee, J.C., & Galinsky, A.D. (2015). Not so lonely at the top: The relationship between power and loneliness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 130, 69-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2015.06.002
  57. Wölfer, R., Schmid, K., Hewstone, M., & van Zalk, M. (2016). Developmental dynamics of intergroup contact and intergroup attitudes: Long-term effects in adolescence and early adulthood. Child Development, 87(5), 1466-1478. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12598
  58. Xu, X., Potters, J., & Suetens, S. (2020). Cooperative versus competitive interactions and in-group bias. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 179, 69-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2020.08.041
  59. Yamagishi, T., Kikuchi, M., & Kosugi, M. (1999). Trust, gullibility, and social intelligence. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2(1), 145-161. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-839x.00030
  60. Zhang, Z., Zhang, X., & Putterman, L. (2019). Trust and cooperation at a confluence of worlds: An experiment in Xinjiang, China. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 161, 128-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2019.03.001

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
下载

Согласие на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика»

1. Я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных»), осуществляя использование сайта https://journals.rcsi.science/ (далее – «Сайт»), подтверждая свою полную дееспособность даю согласие на обработку персональных данных с использованием средств автоматизации Оператору - федеральному государственному бюджетному учреждению «Российский центр научной информации» (РЦНИ), далее – «Оператор», расположенному по адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А, со следующими условиями.

2. Категории обрабатываемых данных: файлы «cookies» (куки-файлы). Файлы «cookie» – это небольшой текстовый файл, который веб-сервер может хранить в браузере Пользователя. Данные файлы веб-сервер загружает на устройство Пользователя при посещении им Сайта. При каждом следующем посещении Пользователем Сайта «cookie» файлы отправляются на Сайт Оператора. Данные файлы позволяют Сайту распознавать устройство Пользователя. Содержимое такого файла может как относиться, так и не относиться к персональным данным, в зависимости от того, содержит ли такой файл персональные данные или содержит обезличенные технические данные.

3. Цель обработки персональных данных: анализ пользовательской активности с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика».

4. Категории субъектов персональных данных: все Пользователи Сайта, которые дали согласие на обработку файлов «cookie».

5. Способы обработки: сбор, запись, систематизация, накопление, хранение, уточнение (обновление, изменение), извлечение, использование, передача (доступ, предоставление), блокирование, удаление, уничтожение персональных данных.

6. Срок обработки и хранения: до получения от Субъекта персональных данных требования о прекращении обработки/отзыва согласия.

7. Способ отзыва: заявление об отзыве в письменном виде путём его направления на адрес электронной почты Оператора: info@rcsi.science или путем письменного обращения по юридическому адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А

8. Субъект персональных данных вправе запретить своему оборудованию прием этих данных или ограничить прием этих данных. При отказе от получения таких данных или при ограничении приема данных некоторые функции Сайта могут работать некорректно. Субъект персональных данных обязуется сам настроить свое оборудование таким способом, чтобы оно обеспечивало адекватный его желаниям режим работы и уровень защиты данных файлов «cookie», Оператор не предоставляет технологических и правовых консультаций на темы подобного характера.

9. Порядок уничтожения персональных данных при достижении цели их обработки или при наступлении иных законных оснований определяется Оператором в соответствии с законодательством Российской Федерации.

10. Я согласен/согласна квалифицировать в качестве своей простой электронной подписи под настоящим Согласием и под Политикой обработки персональных данных выполнение мною следующего действия на сайте: https://journals.rcsi.science/ нажатие мною на интерфейсе с текстом: «Сайт использует сервис «Яндекс.Метрика» (который использует файлы «cookie») на элемент с текстом «Принять и продолжить».