Differentiation of the quality of life in the regional space
- Authors: Prokazina N.V1,2, Alekseenok A.A2, Kaira Y.V2
-
Affiliations:
- Altai Branch of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
- Central Russian Institute of Management - branch of the RANEPA
- Issue: Vol 20, No 3 (2020)
- Pages: 509-526
- Section: Contemporary society: the urgent issues and prospects for development
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2313-2272/article/view/322836
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2272-2020-20-3-509-526
- ID: 322836
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The quality of life depends on the place in the social structure. Social groups have different opportunities for meeting needs and achieving goals. Positions of different social groups in the subjects of the Russian Federation differ, which can significantly influence social well-being and protest moods; therefore, the study of the quality of life in the regional space is important in both theoretical and practical perspectives. The article aims at considering differentiation of the quality of life in the regional space and identifying the most vulnerable social groups. The authors study the quality of life with the multidimensional hierarchical approach based on a complex of interrelated objective and subjective criteria. This methodology was tested in the empirical study of the quality of life in the Oryol Region. The study used the following set of indicators of the quality of life: subjective assessments of the most significant forms of deprivation; movable and immovable property; housing and the quality of living conditions; savings; access to paid social services; professional position, possibilities of professional self-realization; political activity and political culture; leisure preferences and opportunities that entail additional spending; self-identification in different spheres of life. This set of indicators allowed to describe positions of social groups and their regional differentiation: social groups that make up the regional population, their positions in the stratification system, their quantitative and qualitative characteristics were identified. The authors also identified the most vulnerable groups affected by social tensions and showed that the growth of social inequality can lead to an increase in the protest and destructive behavior.
About the authors
N. V Prokazina
Altai Branch of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration; Central Russian Institute of Management - branch of the RANEPA
Author for correspondence.
Email: nvprokazina@mail.ru
доктор социологических наук, профессор кафедры психологии и социологии управления Алтайского филиала Российской Академии народного хозяйства и государственной службы при Президенте Российской Федерации; заведующая кафедрой социологии и информационных технологий Среднерусского института управления - филиала РАНХиГС
Partizanskaya St., 187, Barnaul, 656008, Russia; Blvd Pobedy, 5a, Orel, 302028, RussiaA. A Alekseenok
Central Russian Institute of Management - branch of the RANEPA
Email: alexaconst@rambler.ru
доктор социологических наук, профессор кафедры социологии и информационных технологий Среднерусского института управления
Blvd Pobedy, 5a, Orel, 302028, RussiaYu. V Kaira
Central Russian Institute of Management - branch of the RANEPA
Email: kaira@orel.ranepa.ru
кандидат социологических наук, доцент кафедры социологии и информационных технологий Среднерусского института управления
Blvd Pobedy, 5a, Orel, 302028, RussiaReferences
- Anikin V.A. Sotsialnaja stratifikatsija po zhiznennym shansam: popytka operatsionalizacii dlja massovyh oprosov [Social stratification by life chances: An attempt of operationalization for mass polls]. Monitoring Obshhestvennogo Mnenija: Ekonomicheskie i Socialnye Peremeny. 2018; 4 (In Russ.).
- Bednost i bednye v sovremennoj Rossii [Poverty and the Poor in Contemporary Russia]. Pod red. M.K. Gorshkova, N.E. Tikhonovoj. Moscow; 2014 (In Russ.).
- Bourdieu P. Sociologija politiki [Sociology of Politics]. Moscow; 1993 (In Russ.).
- Golenkova Z.T., Goliusova Ju.V., Orekhova I.M. Protivorechija i problemy modernizatsii socialnoj struktury sovremennogo rossijskogo obshhestva [Contradictions and challenges of the modernization of the social structure of the contemporary Russian society]. Rossija reformirujushhajasja: Vyp. 17. Otv. red. M.K. Gorshkov. Moscow; 2019 (In Russ.).
- Gorshkov M.K. Rossijskoj obshhestvo kak ono est: (opyt sociologicheskoj diagnostiki) [Russian Society as It Is: (Results of the Sociological Diagnostics)]. Moscow; 2011 (In Russ.).
- Zaslavskaja T.I. Transformatsija socialnoj struktury rossijskogo obshhestva [Transformation of the social structure of the Russian society]. Kuda idet Rossija?. Socialnaja transformatsija postsovetskogo prostranstva. Vyp. 3. Moscow; 1996 (In Russ.).
- Zaslavskaja T.I., Ryvkina R.V. Sociologija ekonomicheskoj zhizni. Ocherki teorii [Sociology of Economic Life. Essays on Theory]. Novosibirsk; 1991 (In Russ.).
- Ilyin V.I. Socialnaja stratifikatsija [Social Stratification]. Syktyvkar; 1991 (In Russ.).
- Maloobespechennye v Rossii: Kto oni? Kak zhivut? K chemu stremjatsja? [Low-income groups in Russia: Who are they? How do they live? What do they strive for?]. Informatsionno-analitichesky bjulleten Instituta sociologii RAN. No. 5. Moscow; 2008 (In Russ.).
- Model dokhodnoj stratifikatsii rossijskogo obshhestva: dinamika, faktory, mezhstranovye sravnenija [Model of Income Stratification of the Russian Society: Dynamics, Factors, Cross-Country Comparisons]. Pod red. N.E. Tikhonovoj. Moscow; 2018 (In Russ.).
- Modernizatsija socialnoj struktury rossijskogo obshhestva [Modernization of the Social Structure of the Russian Society]. Otv. red. Z.T. Golenkova. Moscow; 2008 (In Russ.).
- Sredny klass v sovremennoj Rossii: osobennosti identichnostej i mirovozzrenija [Middle class in contemporary Russia: Features of identities and worldview]. Sb. materialov Mezhd. nauch. conf. “Budushhee sociologicheskogo znanija i vyzovy socialnyh transformatsij (k 90-letiju so dnja rozhdenija V.A. Yadova)”. Otv. red. M.K. Gorshkov. Moscow; 2019 (In Russ.).
- Tikhonova N.E. “Negativnaja stabilizatsija” i faktory dinamiki blagosostojanija naselenija v postkrizisnoj Rossii [“Negative stabilization” and factors of the dynamics of the well-being in post-crisis Russia]. Sociologichesky Zhurnal. 2019; 25 (1) (In Russ.).
- Tikhonova N.E. Resursny podhod kak novaja teoreticheskaja paradigma v stratifiktsionnyh issledovanijah [Resource approach as a new theoretical paradigm in the stratification research]. Sociologicheskie Issledovanija. 2006; 9 (In Russ.).
- Tikhonova N.E. Stratifikatsija po zhiznennym shansam massovyh sloev sovremennogo rossijskogo obshhestva [Stratification by life chances of mass strata in the contemporary Russian society]. Sociologicheskie Issledovanija. 2018; 6 (In Russ.).
- Tikhonova N.E., Davydova N.M., Popova I.P. Indeks urovnja zhizni i model stratifikatsii rossijskogo obshhestva [Living Standards Index and model of stratification of the Russian society]. Sociologicheskie Issledovanija. 2004; 6 (In Russ.).
- Tikhonova N.E. Sotsialnaja struktura Rossii: teorii i realnost [Social Structure of Russia: Theories and Reality]. Moscow; 2014 (In Russ.).
- Shkaratan O.I. Socialno-ekonomicheskoe neravenstvo i ego vosproizvodstvo v sovremennoj Rossii [Social-Economic Inequality and Its Reproduction in Contemporary Russia.]. Moscow; 2009 (In Russ.).
- Goldthorpe J., Lockwood D., Bechhofer F., Platt J. The Affluent Worker in the Class Structure. Cambridge; 1969.
- Kohn M.L, Schooler C. Social Structure and Self-Direction: A Comparative Analysis of the United States and Poland. Oxford; 1990.
- Townsend P. Poverty in the United Kingdom. Harmondsworth; 1979.
- Townsend P. International Analysis of Poverty. London; 1993.
Supplementary files
