Social practices transformation: Peter Berger’s and Thomas Luckmann’s theory in crisis society
- 作者: Osipova ED1
-
隶属关系:
- Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia
- 期: 编号 2 (2015)
- 页面: 69-79
- 栏目: ARTICLES
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2313-2272/article/view/340622
- ID: 340622
如何引用文章
全文:
详细
The article is devoted to Peter Berger’s and Thomas Luckmann’s theory of the construction of reality in the context of social practices transformation in the risk society. According to this theory, daily routine appears to be the basis of social reality that is interpreted as the result of the interaction processes. The article considers the fundamental procedures of the social reality construction - institutionalization and legitimization; such an analysis proves the famous sociologists idea that the daily routine is the foundation of social world. However, while analyzing daily routine practices we can see that the habitual behavior patterns are changing and new types of action are developing in the situation of the unstable and unpredictable crisis society. In the contemporary world, the habitual rational logic that we traditionally followed in everyday life to organize our behavior does not fulfill its functions. As a result, a special type of social consciences named catastrophic thinking is developing. Referring to the data of sociological studies the article considers the most striking examples of the social practices transformation and the new type of rational logic development, such as the changing attitudes to the health and the reviving interest to making a will in the contemporary world.
作者简介
E Osipova
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: osipova0512@rambler.ru
Sociology Chair
参考
- Berger P., Lukman T. Social'noe konstruirovanie real'nosti. Traktat po sociologii znanija. URL: http://skepdic.ru/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/0458680_BCA67_piter_berger_ lukman_t_socialnoe_konstruirovanie_realnosti_tr.pdf.
- Bronzino L.Ju., Vol'china A.E. Adaptacija studentov k universitetskoj srede: opyt social'no-fenomenologicheskogo issledovanija // Vestnik RUDN. Serija «Sociologija». 2012. № 4.
- Burd'e P. Sociologija social'nogo prostranstva. M.: Institut jeksperimental'noj sociologii; SPb.: Aletejja, 2005.
- Giddens Je. Ustroenie obshhestva: Ocherki teorii strukturacii. M.: Akademicheskij proekt, 2003.
- Zaveshhanija: ot jekzotiki - k norme? URL: http://fom.ru/posts/11347.
- Kovalevskaja A.F. Formirovanie cennostnogo otnoshenija k zdorov'ju cheloveka // Problemy sovremennoj jekonomiki. 2007. № 1.
- Korolev S.A. Povsednevnost' kak jemanacija social'nosti: transformacii i trendy. URL: http://e-notabene. ru/fr/article_709.html.
- Leuhina L.E. Obydennost' v uslovijah transformacii obshhestvennoj zhizni // Vestnik Chuvashskogo universiteta. 2011. № 2.
- Markov B.V. Ponjatie povsednevnosti v gnoseologii i antropologii // Nauchnaja racional'nost' i struktury povsednevnosti. SPb.: SPbGU, 1999.
- Meshherjakova L.Ju. Fenomenologicheskaja sociologija Al'freda Shjuca: teoreticheskie predposylki i osnovnye idei // Vestnik RUDN. Serija «Sociologija». 2002. № 1.
- Najdysh O.V. «Zhiznennyj mir» i obydennoe soznanie // Vestnik RUDN. Serija «Filosofija». 2011. № 1.
- Ostrovskaja-ml. E.A. Koncepcii institucionalizacii v germanskoj teoreticheskoj sociologii vtoroj poloviny XX veka // Vestnik RUDN. Serija «Sociologija». 2003. № 1.
- Shjuc A. Smyslovaja struktura povsednevnogo mira: ocherki po fenomenologicheskoj sociologii. URL: http://socioline.ru/files/5/165/shchyutc_smyslovaya-struktura-povsedevnosti.pdf.
- Shtompka P. Sociologija social'nyh izmenenij. M.: Aspekt Press, 1996.
- Shtompka P. Kul'turnaja travma v postkommunisticheskom obshhestve // Sociologicheskie issledovanija. 2001. № 2. S. 3-12.
补充文件
