The Unidirectionality of Grammaticalization in Modern Linguistics
- Authors: Novospasskaya N.V.1, Avagyan A.A.1,2
-
Affiliations:
- Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN university)
- Russian State University of Tourism and Service
- Issue: Vol 12, No 1 (2021)
- Pages: 89-104
- Section: FUNCTIONAL GRAMMAR & FUNCTIONAL SEMANTICS
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2313-2299/article/view/323396
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2299-2021-12-1-89-104
- ID: 323396
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The present article contains the results of study on unidirectionality of grammaticalization which is understood as a shift from lexical to grammatical signs. The research aims to find out and describe present approaches to the unidirectionality idea and identify the current tendency in attitudes towards this property of grammaticalization. The research methodology includes a content analysis of approaches to the unidirectionality issue, their generalization and analysis of some units questioning the unidirectionality of grammaticalization. The relevance of grammaticalization studies is due to a growing interest of Russian and foreign linguists in grammatical changes, current differences in identifying the main properties of such change as grammaticalization and terminological variation. The theoretical framework of this study is based on the research by T. Givón, Ch. Lehmann, T. Lindström, E. Traugott, B. Heine and other famous linguists working in the field of grammaticalization. It is noted that the issue of unidirectionality of grammaticalization is almost ignored in Russian linguistics where unidirectionality is often seen as an integral property of this process. The study results have shown the tendency to accepting the unidirectionality idea and a controversial nature of some examples used to overturn this idea. Such examples include English infinitival to , the verb to dare and the suffix -ish . It has been established that the terms ‘degrammaticalization’ and ‘lexicalization’ used to refer to processes opposite to grammaticalization can be considered reasonable depending on their understanding and the meaning of the term ‘grammaticalization’. This study is a part of a more extensive research aimed to describe and analyze the mechanisms of grammaticalization in Germanic languages.
About the authors
Natalia V. Novospasskaya
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN university)
Author for correspondence.
Email: novospasskaya-nv@rudn.ru
PhD in Philology, Associate Professor of the General and Russian Linguistics Department, Philological faculty
6, Miklukho-Maklaya str., Moscow, Russian Federation, 117198Asmik A. Avagyan
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN university); Russian State University of Tourism and Service
Email: 1042190102@rudn.ru
PhD student of the General and Russian Linguistics Department, Philological faculty, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University); lecturer of Russian State University of Tourism and Service
6, Miklukho-Maklaya str., Moscow, Russian Federation, 117198; 99, Glavnaya str., Cherkizovo settlement, Moscow region, Russian Federation, 141221References
- Hopper, P.J. & Traugott, E.C. (2003). Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Meillet, A. (1912). L’évolution des Formes Grammaticales. Scientia (Rivista di scienza), 12 (26), 384—400. (Reprinted in Meillet, A. (1965). Linguistique historique et linguistique générale. Paris: Honoré Champion, 130—148).
- Kiparsky, P. (2011). Grammaticalization as optimization In D. Jonas, J. Whitman, A. Garrett (eds.) Grammatical change origins, nature, outcomes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 15—51.
- Ramat, P. (1992). Thoughts on degrammaticalization. Linguistics, 30, 549—560.
- Newmeyer, F.J. (1998). Language form and language function. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Lightfoot, D. (1999). The development of language: Acquisition, change, and evolution. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Campbell, L. (ed.) (2001). Grammaticalization: A critical assessment. Language Sciences, Special issue, 23 (2—3), 113—166.
- Janda, R. D. (2001). Beyond “Pathways” and “Unidirectionality”: on the discontinuity of language transmission and the counterability of grammaticalization. In: L. Campbell (ed.), Grammaticalization: A Critical assessment (special issue of Language Sciences, Special issue 23(2–3)), 265–340.
- Joseph, B. D. (2001). Is there such a thing as “grammaticalization”? Language Sciences, Special issue, (23 (2—3)), 163—186.
- Haspelmath, M. (1999). Why is grammaticalization irreversible? Linguistics, 37 (6), 1043—1068.
- Haspelmath, M. (2004). On directionality in language change with particular reference to grammaticalization In O. Fischer, M. Norde, H. Perridon (eds.) Up and down the cline. The nature of grammaticalization. Amsterdam—Philadelphia: John Benjamins. pp. 17—44.
- Norde, M. (2009). Degrammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Petré, P. (2016). Unidirectionality as a cycle of convention and innovation: Micro-changes in the grammaticalization of [be going to INF]. Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 30 (1), 115—146.
- Willis, D. (2016). Degrammaticalisation. In: A. Ledgeway, I. Roberts (eds.). Cambridge handbook of historical syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Maisak, T.A. (2005). Grammaticalization of constructions with verbs of motion and verbs of position. Moscow: Languages of Slavic cultures. (In Russ.).
- Nikiforova, S.A. (2012). Grammaticalization problems in German. The Bulletin of the Adyghe State University, the series “Philology and the Arts”, 4, 197—203. (In Russ.).
- Shustova, S.V. (2015). Grammaticalisation: from lexical to grammatical sign (as exemplified in German). Current Issues in Philology and Pedagogical Linguistics, 4 (20), 17—26. (In Russ.).
- Givón, T. (1975). Serial verbs and syntactic change: Niger-Congo In Ch.N. Li (ed.) Word order and word order change. Austin: University of Texas Press. pp. 47—112.
- Lehmann, Ch. (1982). Thoughts on grammaticalization: A Programmatic Sketch. Köln.
- Heine, B., Claudi, U. & Hünnemeyer, F. (1991). Grammaticalization: a conceptual framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Cowie, C. (1995). Grammaticalization and the snowball effect. Language and communication, 15 (2), 181—193.
- Hopper, P. J. & Traugott, E. C. (1993). Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Lindström, T. (2004). The history of the concept of grammaticalisation. PhD thesis. Sheffield : University of Sheffield.
- Kuryłowicz, J. (1965). The evolution of grammatical categories. Diogenes 51, 55—71.
- Norde, M. (2012). Degrammaticalization. Three common controversies In K. Davidse, T. Breban, L. Brems, T. Mortelmans (eds.) Grammaticalization and Language Change: New Reflections. Amsterdam—Philadelphia: John Benjamins. pp. 73—110.
- Brinton, L.J. & Traugott, E.C. (2005). Lexicalization and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Norde, M. (1997). The history of the genitive in Swedish. A Case Study in Degrammaticalization. Amsterdam: Universiteit van Amsterdam.
- Arakin, V.D. (2003). The history of the English language. Moscow: Fizmatlit. (In Russ.).
- Amatov, А.M. & Gurova, Yu.I. (2012). Diachronic study of the infinitive constructions from the historical linguistics perspective. Nauchnye vedomosti [Scientific bulletin. The series “The humanities”],15, 18 (137), 32—39. (In Russ.).
- Fischer, O. (2000). Grammaticalisation: Unidirectional, non-reversable? The case of to before the infinitive in English In O. Fischer, A. Rosenbach, D. Stein (eds.) Pathways of change: Grammaticalization in English (=Studies in Language Companion Series, 53). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. pp. 149—169.
- Beths, F. (1999). The history of dare and the status of unidirectionality. Linguistics, 37(6), 1069—1110.
- Traugott, E.С. (2001). Legitimate counterexamples to unidirectionality. Freiburg: Freiburg University.
- Burridge, K. (1995). From modal auxiliary to lexical verb: The curious case of Pennsylvania German wotte. In: R.M. Hogg, L. van Bergen (eds.), Historical linguistics, Vol. 2. Germanic linguistics. Amsterdam—Philadelphia: John Benjamins. pp. 19—33.
Supplementary files
