Elaborating a Methodology for Gauging a Politician’s Communicative Personality
- Авторлар: Mukhortov D.S.1, Zhovner E.A.1
-
Мекемелер:
- Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University)
- Шығарылым: Том 16, № 1 (2025)
- Беттер: 278-290
- Бөлім: COGNITIVE RESEARCH
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2313-2299/article/view/323551
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2299-2025-16-1-278-290
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/BNTENV
- ID: 323551
Дәйексөз келтіру
Толық мәтін
Аннотация
Communicative behaviour studies require using numerous methodological approaches depending on the goal and tasks of research. Linguopolitical personology conceives of political communication as an institutionalized phenomenon aimed at holding power or winning the race for power, which allows researchers to employ a particular toolset to explore a politician’s communicative behaviour. This article seeks to provide effective methods in crafting communicative types of political personality. A typology hinges upon cross-disciplinary criteria and includes seven types - The Defender, The Statist, The Servant, The Warrior, The Blame Maker, The Ruler, The Idealist, each commensurate with an overarching communicative goal and dependent lexical sets. It is tested by scrutinizing the British parliamentary debates of 2010-2022 and determining the strength of a type correlation by noun and verb frequency; to that end research exploits the Sketch Engine content analysis program. The proposed methodological algorithm, if supplemented by delving into strategies and tactics, can be regarded as a universal tool for analyzing a politician’s communicative behaviour holistically.
Авторлар туралы
Denis Mukhortov
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University)
Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: dennismoukhortov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8174-7055
SPIN-код: 8238-9974
Scopus Author ID: 58159878800
PhD, Associate Professor of the English Department № 1, International Relations School
76, Vernadsky Prospekt, Moscow, Russia Federation, 119454Elizaveta Zhovner
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University)
Email: e.zhovner@my.mgimo.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0656-5307
SPIN-код: 5814-6545
Scopus Author ID: 55281462000
ResearcherId: HLG-7569-2023
PhD in Philology at the English Department № 1, International Relations School
76, Vernadsky Prospekt, Moscow, Russia Federation, 119454Әдебиет тізімі
- Tsutsieva, M.G. (2013). Study of the discourse of a politician’s language personality in the aspect of linguistic personology. The Scientific Opinion, (12), 116–120. (In Russ.). EDN: RTHQRN
- Melnik, N.V. (2017). Linguopersonological strategies of text perception (case study of internet comments to political discourse). Bulletin of Kemerovo State University, 4(72), 197–204. (In Russ.). EDN: ZXVWQR
- Bozhenkova, N.A. (2019). Discourse of politics and religion: value and semasiological components. In: Russkoe slovo v mnogoyazychnom mire: Materialy XIV Kongressa MAPRYAL. Nur-Sultan. (In Russ.). EDN: EREAGR
- Strelets, I.E. (2020). Featuring language and style of the crisis discourse of Donald Trump in 2020. Lomonosov Philology Journal, (6), 100–114. (In Russ.). EDN: KQRVIL
- Ruzhentseva, N.B. (2021). Linguistic personology: Methodology and communicative portrayals of political leaders. Ekaterinburg: Ural State Pedagogical University publ. (In Russ.). EDN: HMPQNG
- Nikiforova, M.V., & Chudinov, A.P. (2017). Linguopolitical personology: methodological basis and methods of study. Current Issues in Philology and Pedagogical Linguistics, 1(25), 117–123. (In Russ.). EDN: YIOLZR
- Mukhortov, D.S., & Zhovner, E.A. (2024). Politicians’ communicative behavioural patterns: A study into British parliamentary discourses of 2010–2022. Social’nye i gumanitarnye znanija, 10(2), 218–229. https://doi.org/10.18255/2412-6519-2024-2-218-229 (In Russ.). EDN: PUONDG
- Jung, C. (2006). Psychological types, S. Lorie (Transl.). Moscow: AST: Khranitel’. (In Russ.).
- Shestopal, E.B. (2020). Representations of an “ideal” as a factor of the perception of a political leader in reality. Polis. Political Studies, (4), 166–180. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2020.04.12 (In Russ.). EDN: BRBFIP
- Egorova-Gantman, E.V., & Pleshakov, K.V. (1999). Political advertising. Moscow: Tsentr politicheskogo konsul’tirovaniya «Nikkolo M». (In Russ.).
- Mark, M., & Pirson, K. (2005). Hero and Rebel. Creating a brand with archetypes, V. Domnina, A. Sukhenko (Transls.). Saint Petersburg: Piter. (In Russ.).
- Alekseev, A.B. (2021). The influence of political discourse on the formation of the language personality of a politician. Vestnik NSU. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, 19(4), 151–166. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7935-2021-19-4-151-166. EDN: CEUIGZ
- Lasswell, G.D. (2005). Psychopathology and politics, T.N. Samsonova (Transls.) & N.V. Korotkova (Transls.). Moscow: Izdatel’stvo RAGS. (In Russ.).
- Hermann, M.G. (1991). Leadership styles and Foreign Policy. Polis. Political Studies, (1), 91–99. (In Russ.). EDN: EQVOKH
- Girardet, R. (1997). Myths and Political Mythologies. Bucharest: The European Institute publishing house.
- Kubryakova, E.S. (2004). Language and knowledge: On the way to receive knowledge about language: Parts of speech from the cognitive point of view. The role of language in knowledge of the world. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskoi kul’tury. (In Russ.). EDN: SUQHIP
- Tsytsarkina, N.N. (2010). Actulalization of frames of ‘social relations’ in modern English. Kurgan: Kurgan State University publ. (In Russ.). EDN: QVYLHZ
- Makarov, M.L. (2003). Foundations of the theory of discourse. Moscow: Gnozis. (In Russ.).
- Chilingaryan, K.P. (2021). Corpus linguistics: theory vs methodology. RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics, 12(1), 196–218. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2299-2021-12-1-196-218 (In Russ.). EDN: YMIAME
- Vine, V., Boyd, R.L., & Pennebaker, J.W. (2020). Natural emotion vocabularies as windows on distress and well-being. Nature communications, 11(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18349-0 EDN: YHFVPK.
- Skubieva, E.N., & Shpilnaya, N.N. (2022). Model of a linguistic personality as a native speaker of dialogical linguistic ability. Philology & Human, (1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.14258/filichel (2022)1-03 (In Russ.). EDN: KAQMJJ
Қосымша файлдар
