Urban Identity Through the Prism of Media Framing
- 作者: Kushneruk S.L.1, Kurochkina M.A.2
-
隶属关系:
- Chelyabinsk State University
- South Ural State Humanitarian Pedagogical University
- 期: 卷 13, 编号 4 (2022): CONTEMPORARY LINGUISTIC INTERPRETATION: TEXT AND CONTEXT
- 页面: 1005-1019
- 栏目: MEDIA LINGUISTICS
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2313-2299/article/view/323470
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2299-2022-13-4-1005-1019
- ID: 323470
如何引用文章
全文:
详细
Urban identity is a complex phenomenon encompassing a wide range of city life aspects, which vary across cultures. In the media discourse, the urban issues are made prominent due to framing. The goal of the authors is to identify and systematize frames that generate meanings about the urban life, and explain them from the point of view of the journalistic strategies. The author focuses on exploring how topical urban issues are framed and presented to the reading audience. To gain a deeper understanding of the communicative schemata that determine interpretations of the city issues, a cognitive-discursive perspective is claimed central to the research. It proves adequate in demonstrating the synergies of two employed methods: discourse analysis and frame analysis. Applying a case-study approach, a sample of 658 texts is analyzed. 2577 contexts have been retrieved from The Nottingham Post between 2014 and 2017. The results show that the urban life representations rest on frame structures of different conceptual complexity. Urban identity is a rich conceptual structure (a macroframe), constituted by four frames, observable in the discourse-world of the city. Each of them has foci, which draw public attention to the social aspects of the urban living. Positive presentation of the authorities has been revealed as the leading macrostrategy aimed at supporting and approving of the initiatives taken by the local administration, which is realized through the strategies of reference, predication, and argumentation. The findings add to the framing analysis and could be beneficial for the development of urban policies.
作者简介
Svetlana Kushneruk
Chelyabinsk State University
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: Svetlana_kush@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4447-4606
Dr. Sci. in Philology, Professor of the Theory and Practice of the English Language Department
129, Br. Kashirinykh Str., Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation, 454001Maria Kurochkina
South Ural State Humanitarian Pedagogical University
Email: kma1974@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0048-483X
Ph.D., Associate Professor of the English Philology Department
69, Lenin Av., Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation, 454080参考
- Birdsall, C. & Kalkman, S. (2018). Making worlds in urban cultural studies. Journal of Urban Cultural Studies, 5, 113-123. https://doi.org/10.1386/jucs.5.2.113_2
- Fraser, B. (2015). Toward an Urban Cultural Studies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137498564
- Yimin, H. (2020). Urban history. In: Z. Yeying (ed.). Contemporary Studies on Modern Chinese History II. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351054003-4
- Monti, D., Borer, M.I., & Macgregor, L. (2014). Urban People and Places. SAGE Publications. URL: https://www.perlego.com/book/2800813/urban-people-and-placespdf (accessed: 21.01.2022).
- Ompad, D.C., Galea, S., & Vlahov, D. (2007). Urbanicity, Urbanization, and the Urban Environment. In: Macrosocial Determinants of Population Health. New York: Springer. pp. 53-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-70812-6_3
- Szczepańska, A. & Senetra, A. (2012). Migrations of city dwellers to suburban areas - the example of the city of Olsztyn. In: D. Szymańska, J. Biegańska (eds.). Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, 18, 117-124. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/v10089-012-0024-2
- Ultramari, C. & Firmino, R.J. (2010). Urban beings or city dwellers? The complementary concepts of ‘urban’ and ‘city’. City & Time, 4(3), 3. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2781445
- Lomakina, O.V. & Nelyubova, N.Yu. (2018). Fictional Text as a Basis for the Internet Meme: based on the Study of modern Receptions. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo Universiteta, 437, 36-44. https://doi.org/10.17223/15617793/437/5 (In Russ.).
- Makarova, A.S. (2019). Realization of Transformation and creative Potential of the Krylatika in Media Discourse. RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics, 10(2), 273-287. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2299-2019-10-2-273-287 (In Russ.).
- Ghazaie, M., Rafieian, M. & Dadashpoor, H. (2021). Celebrating diversity: A framework for urban discourses. Local Development & Society, 2(1), 41-60. https://doi.org/10.1080/268835 97.2021.1883993
- Hess-Lüttich, E. (2016). Urban discourse - City space, city language, city planning: Ecosemiotic approaches to the discourse analysis of urban renewal. Sign Systems Studies, 44 (1/2), 12-33. https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2016.44.1-2.02
- Moschitz, H. (2017). Where is urban food policy in Switzerland? A frame analysis. International Planning Studies, 23, 180-194. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2017.1389644
- Mamonova, N.V. (2021). Social problems in the Chelyabinsk media discourse. In: S.L. Kushneruk & N.S. Olizko (eds.). Media representation of social problems of twin cities. Chelyabinsk: Chelyabinsk State University. (In Russ.).
- Solopova, O.A., Koshkarova, N.N. & Sibiriakov, I.V. (2022). The Image of Chelyabinsk in the 20th century British Media Discourse (1901-1950). RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics, 13(1), 9-26. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2299-2022-13-1-9-26
- Reese, S.D. (2008). Prologue - Framing Public Life: A Bridging Model for Media Research. In: S.D. Reese, O.H. Gandy & Jr.A.E. Grant (Eds.) Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. pp. 7-32.
- Meyer, M. (2001). Between theory, method, and politics: positioning of the approaches to CDA. In: R. Wodak, M. Meyer (eds.) Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: SAGE Publ. pp. 14-31
- Van Dijk, T.A. (2017). Sociocognitive Discourse Studies. In: J. Richardson, J. Flowerdew (eds.). Handbook of Discourse Analysis. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315739342
- Wodak, R. (2006). Mediation between discourse and society: assessing cognitive approaches in CDA. Discourse Studies, 8(1), 179-190. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445606059566
- Gavins, J. & Lahey, E. (eds.). (2016). World Building: Discourse in the Mind. Bloomsbury.
- Ogneva, E.A. & Glamazda, S.N. (2021). The concept of contextual polarization. Moscow. (In Russ.).
- Werth, P. (1999). Text Worlds: Representing Conceptual Space in Discourse. London: Longman.
- Kushneruk, S. (2019). World-modelling in advertising discourse: pragmatic aspects. Calidoscópio, 17(2), 263-281. http://dx.doi.org/10.4013/cld.2019.172.03
- Entman, R. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
- Gamson, W. & Modigliani, A. (1987). The Changing Culture of Affirmative Action. In: R. Braungart (Ed.) Research in Political Sociology 3. Stamford: Jai Press Inc. pp. 137-177.
- Scheufele, D.A. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communications, 49(1), 103-122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02784.x
- Van Gorp, B. (2005). Where is the frame? Victims and Intruders in the Belgian press coverage of the asylum issue. European Journal of Communication, 20(4), 484-507. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323105058253
- Van Gorp, B. (2007). The constructionist approach to framing: Bringing culture back. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 60-78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00329.x
- Tincheva, N. (2018). Discourse-world profiling expressions: contrasting data from British and Bulgarian political speeches. In: Language Close Up. Sofia: Sofia University Press. pp. 297-317.
- Van Dijk, T.A. (1980). Macrostructures: an interdisciplinary study of global structures in discourse, interaction, and cognition. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Pan, Z & Kosicki, G. (1993). Framing analysis: an approach to news discourse. Political communication, 10(1), 55-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.1993.9962963
- Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York: Harper Colphon.
- Semetko, H. & Valkenburg, P. (2000). Framing European Politics: A Content Analysis of Press and Television News. Journal of Communication, 50, 93-109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02843.x
- Tuchman, G. (1978). Making news: A Study in the Construction of Reality. New York: Free Press.
- Kushneruk, S.L. (2021). Law and order as social problem in the discourse of city paper. Research Result. Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 33-48. https://doi.org/10.18413/2313-89122021-7-1-0-4 (In Russ.).
补充文件
