Critique and System: Early and Late Natorp’s Philosophy
- Autores: Pringe H.1,2
-
Afiliações:
- CONICET-UBA
- Diego Portales University
- Edição: Volume 29, Nº 1 (2025): THE PHILOSOPHY OF PAUL NATORP
- Páginas: 105-118
- Seção: THE PHILOSOPHY OF PAUL NATORP
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2313-2302/article/view/325362
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2025-29-1-105-118
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/FIUCPB
- ID: 325362
Citar
Texto integral
Resumo
This paper presents an interpretation of the connection between Natorp’s early and late philosophy. An analysis of two versions of Natorp’s deduction of categories shows the consistent development of Natorp’s thought. Each deduction expresses, in Natorp’s words, a direction of movement between the centre and the periphery. The early deduction moves from the periphery to the centre by means of the transcendental method. The critical investigation of the conditions of possibility of mathematical-physical science reveals the structure of thought itself. The late deduction is oriented in the opposite direction, from the centre to the periphery. Thought now develops freely and establishes the systematic character of philosophy. We argue that the two deductions complement each other in a single coherent position that accounts for the relationship between critique and system. Philosophical systematics is conceived as the necessary sequel and culmination of an inquiry, the first part of which is developed according to the transcendental method.
Sobre autores
Hernán Pringe
CONICET-UBA; Diego Portales University
Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: hernan.pringe@mail.udp.cl
ORCID ID: 0000-0001-7005-4838
Professor
480 Puan St., Buenos Aires, C1053, Argentina; 260 Ejército St., Santiago, 8370056, ChileBibliografia
- Natorp P. Kant und die Marburger Schule. Kant-Studien. 1912;17(1-3):193-221. https://doi.org/10.1515/kant.1912.17.1-3.193
- Kant I. Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998.
- Natorp P. Zu Cohens Logik. In: Holzhey H. Cohen und Natorp. Vol. 2. Basel: Schwabe; 1986. P. 5-40.
- Natorp P. Die Philosophie. Ihr Problem und ihre Probleme. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprech; 1911.
- Natorp P. Die logischen Grundlagen der exakten Wissenschaften. Leipzig: Teubner; 1910.
- Pringe H. Infinitesimal method and judgment of origin. Kant E-prints. 2021;16(2):185-199.
- Natorp P. Logik in Leitsätzen zu akademischen Vorlesungen. 2. Auflage. Marburg: N.G. Elwert; 1910.
- Schäfer L. Kants Metaphysik der Natur. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter; 1966.
- Pringe H. Legalidad empírica y realidad efectiva. Ideas y Valores. 2015;64(158):21-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/ideasyvalores.v64n158.40038
- Pelegrín L. Analytical Method and Synthetic Method in Marburg Neo-Kantianism. Studia Kantiana. 2022;20(2):83-97. https://doi.org/10.5380/sk.v20i2.90398
- Natorp P. Zu Cohens Logik (Entwurf für »Die logischen Grundlagen der exakten Wissenschaften«). In: Holzhey H. Cohen und Natorp. Vol. 2. Basel: Schwabe; 1986. P. 41-78.
- Marx W. Die philosophische Entwicklung Paul Natorps im Hinblick auf das System Hermann Cohens. Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung. 1964;(18):486-500.
- Natorp P. Philosophische Systematik. Hamburg: Meiner; 1958.
- Dufour É. Paul Natorp. De la psychologie générale à la systématique philosophique. Paris: Vrin; 2010.
- Cramer K. Metaphysik im 20. Jahrhundert als Metaphysik nach Hegel. In: Horstmann RP, Henrich D, editors. Metaphysik nach Kant?: Stuttgarter Hegel-Kongress 1987. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta; 1988. P. 297-322.
- Natorp P. Vorlesungen über praktische Philosophie. Erlangen: Verlag der Philosophischen. Akademie; 1925.
- Sijmons J. Natorp und die Hegelsche Dialektik. Hegel-Studien. 1988;(23):265-271.
- Stolzenberg J. Ursprung und System. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht; 1995.
- Pringe H. Cohen and Natorp on transcendental and concrete subjectivity. CR: The New Centennial Review. 2017;17(2):115-134. https://doi.org/10.14321/crnewcentrevi.17.2.0115
- Wetz F. Die Überwindung des Marburger Neukantianismus in der Spätphilosophie Natorps. Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung. 1993;47(1):75-92.
- Heintel E. (Rez) Paul Natorp: Philosophische Systematik. Philosophische Rundschau. 1959;7(3/4):246-259.
Arquivos suplementares
