Freedom of Speech and Expression in the Digital Age: Philosophical Analysis and Social Security Challenges
- Авторлар: Lifanova T.Y.1, Lifanov S.A.1, Verevkin A.V.1
-
Мекемелер:
- Al-Farabi Kazakh National University
- Шығарылым: Том 29, № 2 (2025): CONTEMPORARY SOCIETY AND SOCIAL SECURITY
- Беттер: 381-397
- Бөлім: CONTEMPORARY SOCIETY AND SOCIAL SECURITY
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2313-2302/article/view/325492
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2025-29-2-381-397
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ROFXBD
- ID: 325492
Дәйексөз келтіру
Толық мәтін
Аннотация
Today’s information space poses new challenges to freedom of expression and freedom of speech associated with digital censorship, the spread of misinformation and algorithmic regulation of content. With society’s growing dependence on digital technologies, there is a need to rethink mechanisms for protecting freedom of expression, especially in the context of social security. The aim of this study is to analyse the philosophical foundations of freedom of expression in the digital age through the prism of T. Scanlon’s concept and to assess the role of media education as a tool to promote the formation of a critically thinking society. The materials are based on contemporary research in philosophy, media education and digital technologies. The methodological basis is philosophical analysis, interdisciplinary approach and case studies related to the regulation of freedom of expression in the digital environment. The results of the study show that traditional legal measures to regulate information space are not always effective and may contradict the principle of individual autonomy. In contrast, the development of media literacy allows citizens to consciously perceive information and build their own communication strategy, reducing dependence on institutional and technical control mechanisms. In accordance with the basic features of the philosophical approach, the authors consider freedom of speech as not only a legal category, but also a fundamental principle that ensures the intellectual autonomy of the individual. The specificity of the study lies in the integration of the philosophical discourse on freedom of expression with the current challenges of the digital environment, which allows us to propose new approaches to ensuring social security without compromising democratic values. The study substantiates the need for a balance between protecting the information space and preserving the autonomy of individuals, emphasising that an effective regulatory strategy should include not only legal measures, but also educational initiatives that promote critical thinking and conscious interaction with media.
Негізгі сөздер
Авторлар туралы
Tatiana Lifanova
Al-Farabi Kazakh National University
Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: lifanova.tatiyana@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2269-1255
SPIN-код: 7325-0528
СSc in Philosophy, Associate Professor of the Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Philosophy and Political Science
71 al-Farabi Avenue, Almaty, 050000, Republic of KazakhstanSergey Lifanov
Al-Farabi Kazakh National University
Email: lifanov.sergey.a@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2716-4254
SPIN-код: 1404-4430
PhD Student of the Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Philosophy and Political Science
71 al-Farabi Avenue, Almaty, 050000, Republic of KazakhstanAlexey Verevkin
Al-Farabi Kazakh National University
Email: phiosophy-sociology@mail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1817-8435
SPIN-код: 1724-7639
СSc in Sociology, Associate Professor of the Department of Sociology and Social Work, Faculty of Philosophy and Political Science
71 al-Farabi Avenue, Almaty, 050000, Republic of KazakhstanӘдебиет тізімі
- Wilson C, Grizzle A, Tuazon R, Akyempong K, Cheung CK. Media and information literacy curriculum for teachers. Paris: UNESCO; 2014.
- Howard JW. Freedom of Speech. In: Zalta EN, Nodelman U, editors. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford: Stanford University; 2024. Available from: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2024/entries/freedom-speech (accessed: 15.12.2024).
- Kramer MH. Freedom of Expression as Self-Restraint. Philosophy & Social Criticism. 2022;48(4):473-483. doi: 10.1177/01914537211072885 EDN: KCQEFV
- Sue AT. How to think about freedom of thought (and opinion) in the age of AI. Computer Law & Security Review. 2024;(53):105969. doi: 10.1016/j.clsr.2024.105969 EDN: NWEMRX
- Tetlock PE. Thinking the unthinkable: sacred values and taboo cognitions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2003;7(7):320-324. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00135-9
- Liagusha A, Iarovyi D. Memes, freedom, and resilience to information disorders: Information warfare between democracies and autocracies. Social Sciences & Humanities Open. 2024;(11):101247. doi: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101247 EDN: YWYVTU
- Lasisi M, Adejumo S. Digital Ethics In: Baker D, Ellis L, editors. Encyclopedia of Libraries, Librarianship, and Information Science. Vol. 4. Elsevier Inc.; 2025. P. 118-124. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-323-95689-5.00267-4
- Witschge T. Passive accomplice or active disruptor: The role of audiences in the mediatization of politics. Journalism Practice. 2014;8(3):342-356. doi: 10.1080/17512786.2014.889455
- Scanlon T. A theory of Freedom of Expression. Philosophy and Public Affairs. 1972;1(2):204-226.
- Eftedal NH, Lotte T. Motivated moral judgments about freedom of speech are constrained by a need to maintain consistency. Cognition. 2021;(211):104623. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104623 EDN: JNFDSD
- Chan J. Understanding Free Speech as a Two-Way Right. Political Philosophy. 2024;(1):156-180. doi: 10.16995/pp.15321 EDN: HHZRJC
- Redish MH. Value of Free Speech. University of pennsylvania law review. 1982;(130):591-645. Available from: https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/penn_law_ review/vol130/iss3/2 (accessed: 15.12.2024). doi: 10.2307/3311836
- Shiffrin SV. A thinker-based approach to freedom of speech. Constitutional Commentary. 2011:(2):283-307.
- Kendrick L. Are speech rights for speakers? Virginia Law Review. 2017;(8):1767-1808.
- Eşitti Ş. Narcotizing Effect of Social Media. Journal of the Institute of Social Sciences Cankiri Karatekin University. 2016;(1):1015-1030.
- Kuehn EF. The information ecosystem concept in information literacy: A theoretical approach and definition. Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology. 2023;(4):434-443. doi: 10.1002/asi.24733 EDN: VVGWOX
- Briand SC, Cinelli M, Nguyen T, Lewis R, Prybylski D, Valensise CM, et al. Infodemics: a new challenge for public health. Cell. 2021;(25):6010-6014. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.10.031 EDN: VOLMVY
- Germani F, Spitale G, Machiri SV, Ho C, Ballalai I, Biller-Andorno N, et al. Ethical Considerations in Infodemic Management: Systematic Scoping Review. JMIR Infodemiology. 2024;(4):e56307. doi: 10.2196/56307 EDN: BBHAPC
- Chakraborty S, Goyal S, Rieder A, Onuchowska A, Berndt DJ. Freedom of speech or freedom of reach? Strategies for mitigating malicious content in social networks. Decision Support Systems. 2024;182(7415):114235. doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2024.114235 EDN: DRXPWP
- Cavazos R. The Economic Cost of Bad Actors on the Internet: Fake News in 2019. Available from: https://www.cheq.ai/fakenews (accessed: 15.12.2024).
- Huang T. Decentralized social networks and the future of free speech online. Computer Law & Security Review. 2024;(55):106059. doi: 10.1016/j.clsr.2024.106059 EDN: IUUZJO
- Thoman E, Jolls T. Literacy for the 21st century: An overview and orientation guide to media literacy education. Santa Monica: Center for Media Literacy; 2008.
- Boler M, Trigiani A, Gharib H. Media education: history, frameworks, debates and challenges, In: Tierney RJ, Rizvi F, Ercikan K, editors. International Encyclopedia of Education (fourth Edition). Elsevier Inc.; 2023. P. 301-312. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-818630-5.08058-1
- Lee S, Kim BG, Kim H. An integrated view of knowledge management for performance. Journal of Knowledge Management. 2012;16(2):183-203. doi: 10.1108/13673271211218807
- Pinto M, Garcia-Marco J, Caballero D, Manso R, Uribe A, Gomez C. Assessing information, media and data literacy in academic libraries: Approaches and challenges in the research literature on the topic. The Journal of Academic Librarianship. 2024;50(5):102920. doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102920 EDN: BRGRFR
- Mansoor HMH. Media and information literacy as a model of societal balance: A grounded meta-synthesis. Heliyon. 2024;10(3):e25380. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon. 2024.e25380 EDN: UJFIJO
Қосымша файлдар
