RECEPTION OF ETHICS OF DISCOURSE IN MODERN PHILOSOPHY
- Autores: Tetyuev L.I.1
-
Afiliações:
- N.G. Chernyshevsky State University of Saratov
- Edição: Volume 23, Nº 2 (2019)
- Páginas: 240-252
- Seção: DISCUSSION PLATFORM
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2313-2302/article/view/344788
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2019-23-2-240-252
- ID: 344788
Citar
Texto integral
Resumo
The article analyzes the theoretical foundations of the modern project of rational ethics, in which the ethics of discourse is interpreted as a critical theory of society and a critic of modern morality. I. Kant was one of the first to offer the possibility of generalizing the norms of morality and perception of ethics as a transcendental critique of morality. Neo-Kantianism develops ethics as the most important part of the philosophical system and fixes its scope by the idealistic theory of morality (H. Cohen, P. Natorp). In Russian philosophy, modern ethics is perceived as a normative theory that has to do with issues of self-determination, moral regulation, and freedom of choice. The origins of discourse ethics in the philosophy of the 20th century go back to the “pragmatic turn” and to vigorous discussions about hermeneutics of language and its a priori status in German philosophy, and in analytical philosophy regarding the understanding of metaetics. The modern program of ethics of discourse receives meaningful justification as the logic of moral argumentation in the social philosophy of J. Habermas and in the transcendental pragmatics K.-O. Apel. The ethics of discourse is born from the real need to justify moral requirements and norms. Ethics as a critique of moral argument is associated with the pre-reflexive horizon of the life world, why it is a deontological, formalistic and universal ethics. Two significant projects of discourse ethics, presented in the article as an analysis, should be defined as “weak and strong” variants of philosophical transcendental idealism in modern science.
Sobre autores
L. Tetyuev
N.G. Chernyshevsky State University of Saratov
Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: tetjuewl@mail.ru
доктор философских наук, доцент, профессор кафедры этики и эстетики философского факультета Саратовского национального исследовательского государственного университета имени Н.Г. Чернышевского
Astrachanskaja St., 83, Saratov, Russia, 410000Bibliografia
- Belov VN. Jetika v sisteme filosofskogo kriticizma Germana Kogena [Ethics in the system of philosophical criticism of Hermann Cohen]. Jeticheskaja mysl'. Ezhegodnik [Ethical Thought. Yearbook]. Moscow: IF RAN; 2014. P. 174—199. (In Russ.).
- Drobnickij OG. Moral'naja filosofija: Izb. Trudy [Moral philosophy: Works]. Moscow; 2002. (In Russ.).
- Epifanova NN. Ponjatie “moral'nogo dolzhnogo”: I. Kant i neokantianstvo [The concept of “moral due”: I. Kant and Neo-kantianism]. Problemy jetiki: istoriko-filosofskij i professional'nyj kontekst / otv. red. LI. Tetjuev. [Problems of ethics: historical-philosophical and professional context / resp. ed. LI Tetyuev]. Saratov: Nauka; 2015. P. 34—41. (In Russ.).
- Kant I. Lekcii po jetike / per. AK Sudakova i VV Krylovoj. Obshh. red., sost. i vstupit. st. AA Gusejnova. [Lectures on ethics / transl. AK Sudakov and VV Krylova. Ed. AA Huseynov]. Moscow: Respublika; 2000. 431 p. (In Russ.).
- Kant I. Issledovanie stepeni jasnosti principov estestvennoj teologii i morali [Study of the degree of clarity of the principles of natural theology and morality]. Kant I. Soch.: v 6 t. Moscow, 1963—1966. Vol. 2. P. 243—276. (In Russ.).
- Kant I. Religija v predelah tol'ko razuma [Religion within the limits of reason only]. Kant I. Traktaty i pis'ma [Treatises and letters]. Moscow; 1980. P. 78—278. (In Russ.).
- Kant I. Kritika prakticheskogo razuma, per. pod red. EYu Solov'eva [Criticism of practical reason / transl. by ed. EYu Solovyov]. Kant I. Soch. na russ. i nem. jaz.: V 4 t. Moscow; 1997. Vol. 3. 784 p. (In Russ.).
- Myasnikov AG. Immanuil Kant i Vladimir Solov'ev: problema istolkovanija kategoricheskogo imperativa [Immanuel Kant and Vladimir Soloviev: the problem of interpreting the categorical imperative]. Immanuil Kant i aktual'ny problemy sovremennoj filosofii / pod obshhej red. LI Tetyuev: v 2 t. [Immanuel Kant and the problems of modern philosophy are relevant / under the general ed. LI Tetyuev]. Moscow: Action; 2005. V. 1. P. 146—147. (In Russ.).
- Neokantianstvo nemeckoe i russkoe: mezhdu teoriej poznanija i kritikoj kul'turyб pod red. IN Grifcovoj, NA Dmitrievoj [German and Russian Neo-Kantianism: between the theory of knowledge and the criticism of culture, ed. IN Griftsova, NA Dmitrieva]. Moscow: ROSSPEN; 2010. 567 p. (In Russ.).
- Oizerman TI. Nravstvennoe soznanie i religija v sisteme I. Kanta [Moral consciousness and religion in the system of I. Kant]. Kantovskij sbornik. 1993; 17: 3—11. (In Russ.).
- Rickert H. Filosofija zhizni [Philosophy of Life.]. Kiev: Nika-Centr; 1998. (In Russ.).
- Rokmor TK. kritike jetiki diskursa [To the criticism of discourse ethics]. Voprosy filosofii. 1995; (1):106—117. (In Russ.).
- Solovyov EYu. Znanie, vera, nravstennost' [Knowledge, faith, morality]. Nauka i nravstvennost' [Science and morality]. Moscow, 1971. P. 214—226. (In Russ.).
- Solovyov JeV. Kategoricheskij imperativ nravstvennosti i prava [The categorical imperative of morality and law]. Moscow: Progress-Tradition; 2005. 416 p. (In Russ.).
- Sudakov AK. Stoicheskaja i jepikurejskaja tendencija v jetike Kanta [The Stoic and Epicurean tendency in Kant's ethics] Moscow: IF RAN; 1991. (In Russ.).
- Tetyuev LI. Poma A. Kriticheskaja filosofija Germana Kogena [Poma A. Critical philosophy of Hermann Cohen]. Voprosy filosofii. 2012;12:189—190. (In Russ.).
- Tetyuev LI. Kant i sovremennaja prakticheskaja filosofija: Aktual'nye problemy i diskussii [Kant and modern practical philosophy: Actual problems and discussions]. Saratov: IC Nauka, 2018. (In Russ.).
- Habermas Ju. Jetika diskursa: zamechanija k programme obosnovanija [Discourse Ethics: Remarks on the Justification Program]. Habermas Ju. Moral'noe soznanie i kommunikativnoe dejstvie [Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action]. St. Petersburg: Nauka, 2000. P. 67—172. (In Russ.).
- Filosofija Kanta i osnovanija prakticheskoj filosofii: monografija, pod obshh. red. VN Belov i LI Tetyuev [The philosophy of Kant and the foundations of practical philosophy: a monograph, ed. V.N. Belov and LI Tetyuev]. Saratov: New Project; 2013. 204 p. (In Russ.).
- Apel K-O. Diskursethik als Verantwortungsethik — eine postmetaphysische Transformation der Ethik Kants. In: Kant in der Diskussion der Moderne. Frankfurt аm Main: Suhrkamp; 1996. S. 326—331. (In Germ.).
- Habermas J. Diskursethik — Notitzen zu einem Begründungsprogramm. In: Habermas J. Moralbewußtsein und kommunikatives Handeln. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp; 1983. S. 53—126. (In Germ.).
- Habermas J. Zur Kritik der funktionalistischen Vernunft. In: Habermas J. Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. In 2 Bd. Frankfurt аm Main: Suhrkamp; 1988. Bd. 2. (In Germ.).
- Habermas J. Moralbewußtsein und kommunikatives Handeln. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp; 1988. 208 S. (In Germ.).
- Habermas J. Erläuterungen zur Diskursethik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp; 1991. 229 S. (In Germ.).
- Schönrich G. Bei Gelegenheit Diskurs. Von den Grenzen der Diskursethik und den Preis der Letztbegründung. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp; 1994. 187 S. (In Germ.).
- Schnädelbach H. Kant — der Philosoph der Moderne. In: Kant in der Diskussion der Moderne. Frankfurt аm Main: Suhrkamp; 1996. (In Germ.).
- Wellmer A. Ethik und Dialog: Elemente des moralischen Urteils bei Kant und in der Diskursethik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp; 1986. 224 S. (In Germ.).
- Zur Anwendung der Diskursethik in Politik, Recht und Wissenschaft, hrsg. Von Karl-Otto Apel und Matthias Kettner. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp; 1993. 372 S. (In Germ.).
Arquivos suplementares
