Experimental Turn in Philosophy
- Autores: Zaitseva N.V.1, Zaitsev D.V.1
-
Afiliações:
- Lomonosov Moscow State University
- Edição: Volume 28, Nº 4 (2024): EXPERIMENTAL PHILOSOPHY
- Páginas: 931-944
- Seção: EXPERIMENTAL PHILOSOPHY
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2313-2302/article/view/325374
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2024-28-4-931-944
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/JAJMIK
- ID: 325374
Citar
Resumo
The research serves as an introduction to experimental philosophy and introduces a special journal issue on this topic. We trace a brief history of experimental philosophy and consider different variants of its interpretation. Building upon this, we propose the interpretation of experimental philosophy not as a particular direction or stage in the development of philosophical thought but rather as a radical change in the method of philosophical inquiries, involving the synthesis of traditional philosophical research methods and methodology of empirical (primarily cognitive) science to solve philosophical problems. An important characteristic feature of experimental philosophy, so defined, is its interdisciplinarity. The philosopher does not just use the results of empirical research but can participate in research at all stages, starting with constructing a model of the phenomenon or process under study and hypothesizing, consistently going through the selection of stimulus material and the design of the experiment towards the interpretation of the results and their philosophical understanding. This interpretation of experimental philosophy opens up the possibility of experimental philosophical research in any field, from epistemology or ontology to logic and philosophy of language, without a far-fetched division into analytical and experimental versions. At the same time, the authors emphasize the remarkable fruitfulness of (neuro)phenomenology, which, due to its appeal to direct subjective experience, turns out to be methodologically close to the natural sciences. The final part provides a brief overview of the studies in the thematic issue.
Palavras-chave
Sobre autores
Natalia Zaitseva
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: natvalen@list.ru
ORCID ID: 0000-0002-1691-1402
Código SPIN: 3458-9236
PhD in Philosophy, Leading Research Associate, Department of Philosophy of Language and Communication, Faculty of Philosophy
27/4 Lomonosovsky Prospekt, Moscow, GSP-1, 119991, Russian FederationDmitry Zaitsev
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Email: zaitsev@philos.msu.ru
ORCID ID: 0000-0002-9076-4658
Código SPIN: 3506-3020
DSc in Philosophy, Department of Logic, Faculty of Philosophy
27/4 Lomonosovsky Prospekt, Moscow, GSP-1, 119991, Russian FederationBibliografia
- Li J, Zhu X. Twenty years of experimental philosophy research. Metaphilosophy. 2023;54(1):29-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.12602
- Knobe J, Nichols S. ExperimentalPhilosophy. In: Zalta EN, editor. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available from: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/experimental-philosophy/ (accessed: 10.05.2024).
- Machery E et al. Semantics, cross-cultural style. Cognition. 2004;92(3):B1-B12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.003
- Knobe J. Intentional action and side effects in ordinary language. Analysis. 2003;63(3):190-194. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8284.00419
- Weinberg JM, Nichols S, Stich S. Normativity and epistemic intuitions. Philosophical topics. 2001;29(1/2):429-460. https://doi.org/10.5840/philtopics2001291/217
- Knobe J, Nichols S, editors. Experimental philosophy. Oxford University Press; 2007. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195323252.002.0004
- Hume D. Works in 2 vols. Vol. 1. Moscow: Thought; 1996.
- Libet B. Unconscious cerebral initiative and the role of conscious will in voluntary action. Behavioral and brain sciences. 1985:8(4):529-539. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x00044903
- Wilkenfeld DA, Samuels R, editors. Advances in experimental philosophy of science. Bloomsbury Publishing; 2019. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350068896
- Alexander J. Experimental philosophy: An introduction. Polity; 2012. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0031819113000259
- Gilbert F et al. Embodiment and estrangement: results from a first-in-human “intelligent BCI” trial. Science and engineering ethics. 2019;25:83-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-0001-5
- Klein E et al. Engineering the brain: ethical issues and the introduction of neural devices. Hastings Center Report. 2015;45(6):26-35. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.515.
- Alexander J, Mallon R, Weinberg JM. Accentuate the negative. Review of Philosophy and Psychology. 2010;1:297-314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-009-0015-2
- Gallagher S, Zahavi D. The phenomenological mind. Routledge: 2020. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429319792
- Westlin C et al. Improving the study of brain-behavior relationships by revisiting basic assumptions. Trends in cognitive sciences. 2023;27(3):246-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2022.12.015
Arquivos suplementares
