“Common Denominator” in Solving Multi-Factory Problems by Intelligent Systems
- Autores: Adzhemov A.S.1, Denisova A.B.2
-
Afiliações:
- Moscow Technical University of Communications and Informatics
- National Research University MPEI
- Edição: Volume 27, Nº 4 (2023): PHILOSOPHY OF CONSCIOUSNESS AND NEUROSCIENCE
- Páginas: 878-887
- Seção: PHILOSOPHY OF CONSCIOUSNESS AND NEUROSCIENCE
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2313-2302/article/view/325218
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2023-27-4-878-887
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/SVNHWH
- ID: 325218
Citar
Texto integral
Resumo
The most important property, a distinctive feature of any intelligent system, is its decision-making ability. In this case, the more complex the problem to be solved, the more and more diverse the initial data, and the more critical it is that the decision to be made was comprehensively considered and evaluated. In many cases, simultaneously arriving various initial data, if considered separately, and decisions based on such consideration lead to completely different results, often contradicting each other. Therefore, in the process of development and implementation of artificial intelligence (AI), it is especially important to investigate the “mechanism” of decision-making in conditions of the inconsistency of incoming initial data and the need to establish some generalizing rule, according to which it is possible to find a harmonizing solution taking into account various influencing factors. It is evident that when establishing the rules of decision-making, it is necessary to strive for a “positive” result from the point of view of the problem being solved. This undoubtedly requires analyzing the consequences of the decision made in a set time scale, which can be provided by appropriate feedback that will allow us to make the necessary corrective actions. Artificial intelligence in modern forms of practical realization has, as a rule, a digital embodiment. It should be taken into account that the digital representation of data inevitably shows an inaccurate display of initial values when processes of a continuous nature are considered and analyzed. Since a digital model has certain limitations and characteristic properties when analyzing and processing initial data, it is logical to assume that for this reason, there can be some general approach, some general rule, according to which a decision is made in the conditions of diverse initial data and the need to take into account the relevant consequences after the decision is made. This paper attempts to find a decision-making mechanism, harmonizing it according to the incoming external and available internal input data.
Palavras-chave
Sobre autores
Artem Adzhemov
Moscow Technical University of Communications and Informatics
Email: asa@mtuci.ru
ORCID ID: 0000-0002-1616-323X
Dr. Sciences, Professor, President-Chairman of the Board of Trustees, Head of Department of General Theory of Communications
8а Aviamotornaya St., 111024, Moscow, Russian FederationAlla Denisova
National Research University MPEI
Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: den-alla@yandex.ru
ORCID ID: 0000-0002-4934-5267
PhD in Philosophy, Associate Professor, Associate Professor, Department of Philosophy, Psychology and Sociology
14/1 Krasnokazarmennaya St., 111250, Moscow, Russian FederationBibliografia
- Timofeev AV. Essence and problems of artificial intelligence in the context of modern scientific and philosophical conceptions. Bulletin of Moscow Region State University. Series: Philosophical Sciences. 2020;(2):127-133. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-7227-2020-2-127-133
- Ioseliani AD, Tskhadadze NV. Artificial intelligence: socio-philosophical comprehension. Medicine. Sociology. Philosophy. Applied research. 2019;(2):196-202. (In Russian).
- Zabezhailo MI, Borisov VV. On the interpretation of the concept of "artificial intelligence". Speech Technologies. 2022;(1):5-18. (In Russian).
- Abramova AV. Ethics in the field of artificial intelligence - from discussion to scientific justification and practical application: an analytical report. Moscow: MGIMO-University; 2021. (In Russian).
- Raykov AN. Subjectivity of explainable artificial intelligence. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences. 2022;65(1):72-90. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2022-65-1-72-90
- Dubrovsky DI. The Task of the Creation of Artificial General Intelligence and the Problem of Consciousness. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences. 2021;64(1):13-44. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2021-64-1-13-44
- Lepskiy VE. Artificial Intelligence in Subject-Oriented Control Paradigms. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences. 2021;64(1):88-101. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2021-64-1-88-101
- Heaven WD. Why asking an AI to explain itself can make things worse. MIT Technology Review. Available from: https://www.technologyreview.com/2020/01/29/304857/why-asking-an-ai-to-explain-itself-can-make-things-worse/ (accessed: 03.08.2023).
- Ekman P. Psychology of emotions. Peter; 2019. (In Russian).
- Izard Carroll E. Psychology of emotions. Peter; 2006. (In Russian).
- Ermakova AA, Tumasyan TA. The influence of negative emotions on the human body. Vestnik nauki. 2019;3(12):9-11. (In Russian).
Arquivos suplementares
