Immanuel Kant “on the Borders” of A. Bely’s Symbolism
- Авторлар: Marchevsky O.1
-
Мекемелер:
- University of Presov
- Шығарылым: Том 26, № 2 (2022): INDIAN PHILOSOPHY AND CULTURE
- Беттер: 427-438
- Бөлім: HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2313-2302/article/view/325334
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2022-26-2-427-438
- ID: 325334
Дәйексөз келтіру
Толық мәтін
Аннотация
The occasion of the 100th anniversary of I. Kant’s death was a colossal impulse for many researchers of Immanuel Kant’s legacy. One of the goals of the paper is to introduce one of the less known anniversary critical texts, which appeared in the Russian intellectual milieu. It attempts to disrupt the usual approach regarding the interpretation of Bely’s comprehension of Kant’s legacy, i.e., Kant as a skeleton of philosophy or a police officer of thinking. The paper points to a more systematically conceived scale of Bely’s reflections of Kant. From Bely’s point of view, Kant is the author of firm grounds for the shaping of thought. On the unstable background of philosophy, which during the historical development of thought succumbed to erosion, it is Kant’s philosophy that serves as the stabilizing base. Bely tries to highlight that Kant’s epistemology forms distinctively outlined the foundations of a knowledge of the world and philosophical comprehension not only of history but also of symbolism. The symbolism of Andrei Bely.
Негізгі сөздер
Авторлар туралы
Ondrej Marchevsky
University of Presov
Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: ondrej.marchevsky@unipo.sk
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3951-7053
PhD., Associate Professor
17, Novembra 1, 080 01 Presov, SlovakiaӘдебиет тізімі
- Bely А. Krititsizm i simvolizm. Po povodu stoletiya so dnya smerti Kanta [Criticism and Symbolism. On the centenary of the death of Kant]. In: Abramov AI, Zhuchkov VA (eds.). Kant: pro et contra. Sankt-Peterburg; 2005. P. 555-564. (In Russian).
- Chernov SА. Krititsizm i mistitsizm (Obzor kantianstva v zhurnale Voprosy filosofii i psikhologii) [Criticism and Mistitsizm (Overview of Kantiana of Journal Problems of philosophy and psychology)]. In: Kamenskij ZA, Zhuchkov VA (eds.). Kant i filosofiya v Rossii. Moscow: Nauka publ.; 1994. P. 114-150. (In Russian).
- Lopatin LМ. Nrasvtvennoje uchenie Kanta [Moral thought of Kant ]. In: Abramov AI, Zhuchkov VA (eds.). Kant: pro et contra. Sankt-Peterburg; 2005. P. 470-483. (In Russian).
- Lopatin LМ. Uchenie Kanta o poznanii [Kant’s lore of knowledge]. In: Abramov AI, Zhuchkov VA (eds.). Kant: pro et contra. Sankt-Peterburg; 2005. P. 484-497. (In Russian).
- Kant I. Kritika praktického rozumu [Critique of Practical Reason]. Praha: Svoboda; 1996. (In Slovak).
- Novgorodcev PI. Кant kak moralist [Kant as Moralist]. Voprosy filosofii i psychologii. 1905;76:19-35. (In Russian).
- Schopenhauer A. Svet ako vôľa a predstava. Prvé nazeranie sveta ako predstavy [The World as a Will and Representation. The World as Representation, First Aspect]. In: Hrušovský I, Zigo M (eds.). Positivism, Voluntarism, Neokantianism. Vol. VII. Bratislava: Vydavateľstvo politickej literatúry; 1967. P. 289-302. (In Slovak).
- Stachon M. Kant a problém spoločnosti [Kant and the Problem of Society]. Studia Philosophica Kantiana. 2017;2:39-60. (In Slovak).
- Vernadskij VI. Kant i yestestvoznaniye XVIII stoletiya [Kant and natural science in XVIII century]. In: Abramov AI, Zhuchkov VA. (eds.). Kant: pro et contra. Sankt-Peterburg; 2005. P. 440-469. (In Russian).
- Walicki A. Zarys Myśli Rosyjskiej od Oświecenia do Renesansu Religijno-Filozoficznego [An outline of the Russian Thought from the Enlightenment to the Religious and Philosophical Renaissance]. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego; 2005. (In Polish).
Қосымша файлдар
