Building Community Resilience to the Risks of Natural Disasters in Ensuring Societal Security - Case Studies of Floods in Germany and the Czech Republic in 2021-2024
- 作者: Glaser M.A.1, Gatskovskaya V.A.1, Poliachenkov A.V.1
-
隶属关系:
- National Research University “Higher School of Economics”
- 期: 卷 29, 编号 2 (2025): CONTEMPORARY SOCIETY AND SOCIAL SECURITY
- 页面: 335-352
- 栏目: CONTEMPORARY SOCIETY AND SOCIAL SECURITY
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2313-2302/article/view/325489
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2025-29-2-335-352
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/QGKKOR
- ID: 325489
如何引用文章
全文:
详细
This study examines the concept of societal security, distinguishing it from other forms of security, and highlights crisis management as a key area for applying this framework in the analysis of social phenomena. The functioning of societal security mechanisms is illustrated through the case of community resilience to natural disasters, specifically focusing on responses to floods in Germany and the Czech Republic. Using a descriptive case study method, the research identifies differences in how these two countries build societal resilience to disaster risks. The authors argue that Germany and the Czech Republic vary not only in the amount of available social, economic, human, and physical capital but also in how these resources are utilized. The presence of resources alone is not sufficient to guarantee effective crisis resolution or societal security in the face of natural hazards. The study finds that the key divergence lies in the balance between strategies of resource mobilization and exploitation. The Czech Republic tends to rely on mobilization, while Germany emphasizes the exploitation of existing capacities. This imbalance shapes their respective approaches to societal security and affects the resilience of communities to flood-related risks. The authors conclude that there are currently no clear prospects for restoring balance between these strategies in either country. They stress the need for coordinated governance, integrated problem-solving, and clearly defined responsibilities across institutions. Without such mechanisms, communities may face existential threats due to ineffective crisis management.The study also warns that inadequate disaster response and prevention can undermine public trust in state institutions, potentially leading to political instability. From this perspective, societal security emerges as a vital dimension of national well-being and sustainable development.
作者简介
Marina Glaser
National Research University “Higher School of Economics”
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: mglaser@hse.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7069-4779
SPIN 代码: 8048-2073
DSc in Philosophy, Professor of the Department of International Relations, Faculty of World Economy and World Politics
17 M. Ordynka St., Moscow, 119017, Russian FederationVarvara Gatskovskaya
National Research University “Higher School of Economics”
Email: gatskovskaya10@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8536-3542
SPIN 代码: 9391-1680
Junior Researcher of the Laboratory for Political Geography and Contemporary Geopolitics, Faculty of World Economy and World Politics
17 M. Ordynka St., Moscow, 119017, Russian FederationAnton Poliachenkov
National Research University “Higher School of Economics”
Email: tony.fielding@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5690-5835
Candidate of Political Sciences, Visiting Lecturer of the Department of International Relations, Faculty of World Economy and World Politics
17 M. Ordynka St., Moscow, 119017, Russian Federation参考
- Rys V. Reinventing social security worldwide: Back to essentials. Policy Press; 2010. doi: 10.56687/9781847426420
- Glaser MА, Ivlev VU, Novik NN. Discourses of biopolitics and human security amid new challenges to mankind. Voprosy Filosofii. 2021;(2):42-52. (In Russian). doi: 10.21146/0042-8744-2021-2-42-52 EDN: CPRBZV
- Roe P. Ethnic violence and the societal security dilemma. Routledge; 2004. doi: 10.4324/9780203005446
- Lægreid P, Rykkja LH, editors. Societal Security and Crisis Management: Governance Capacity and Legitimacy. Springer; 2018.
- Dwyer G. Making Sense of Natural Disasters. The Learning Vacuum of Bushfire Public Inquiries. Palgrave Macmillan Cham; 2022. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-94778-1
- Adger WN. Social and ecological resilience: are they related? Progress at Human Geography. 2000;24(3):247-364. doi: 10.1191/030913200701540465 EDN: JTPISP
- Masterson JH, Peacock WG, Van Zandt SS, Grover H, Schwarz LF, Cooper JT. Planning for Community Resilience: A Handbook for Reducing Vulnerability to Disasters. Washington, DC: Island Press; 2014.
- Foster CS. Achieving a Culture of Disaster Resilience. In: Siedschlag A, Jerković A, editors. Homeland Security Cultures Enhancing Values while Fostering Resilience. Rowman & Littlefield International Ltd. London-N.Y; 2018.
- Norris F, Stevens S, Pfefferbaum V, Whyche K, Pfefferbaum R. Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities and strategy for disaster readiness. American Journal of Community Psychology. 2008;41(1-2):127-150. doi: 10.1007/s10464-007-9156-6 EDN: YAATUV
- Gerring J. Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press; 2017. doi: 10.1017/9781316848593
- Poljansek K, et al. Recommendations for National Risk Assessment for Disaster Risk Management in EU. JRC science for policy report. European Commission; 2021.
- Parker CF, Persson T, Widmalm S. The effectiveness of national and EU-level civil protection systems: Evidence from 17 member states. Journal of European Public Policy. 2019;26(9):1312-1334. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2018.1523219
- Thieken AH, et al. Review of the Flood Risk Management System in Germany after the Major Flood in 2013. Ecology and Society. 2016;21(2):51. doi: 10.5751/ES-08547-210251
补充文件
