Innovation and productivity: the case of Nordic countries
- Авторлар: Balashova S.A.1, Abramova A.A.1
-
Мекемелер:
- Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
- Шығарылым: Том 29, № 1 (2021)
- Беттер: 88-98
- Бөлім: INNOVATIONS IN THE MODERN ECONOMY
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2313-2329/article/view/324239
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2329-2021-29-1-88-98
- ID: 324239
Дәйексөз келтіру
Толық мәтін
Аннотация
Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden form a group of the Nordic countries, considered welfare states and the global leaders in innovative development. The link between the growth rate of total factor productivity and innovative development, controlling such factors as trade openness and prices volatility in commodity markets, is examined. The econometric analysis results show that the relationship between the level of innovative development and the rate of productivity growth is more robust for the Nordic countries than for the EU countries on average. Features of the national innovation systems and financing of R&D in the Nordic countries and factors contributing to the impact of innovation activity on productivity are highlighted.
Авторлар туралы
Svetlana Balashova
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: balashova-sa@rudn.ru
PhD in Physics and Mathematics, Head of the Department of Economic and Mathematical Modeling of the Faculty of Economics
6 Miklukho-Maklaya St, Moscow, 117198, Russian FederationAnastasia Abramova
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
Email: 1032173040@rudn.ru
bachelor of the Department of Economic and Mathematical Modeling of the Faculty of Economics
6 Miklukho-Maklaya St, Moscow, 117198, Russian FederationӘдебиет тізімі
- Aye, G.C., et al. (2014). Oil price uncertainty and manufacturing production. Energy Economics, 43, 41-47. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2014.02.004
- Azad, N.F., & Serletis, A. (2020). Oil price shocks in major emerging economies. SSRN Electronic Journal, (403). doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3577378.
- Balashova, S. (2015). The impact of public R&D policy on business-funded R&D (case of OECD countries). Applied Econometrics, 2(38), 244-250. (In Russ.)
- Balashova, S. (2016). The impact of innovation activity on socio-economic performance: Empirical evidence for European countries. SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences and Arts (pp. 777-784). Sofia. doi: 10.5593/sgemsocial2016B25.
- Cubeddu, M.L.M., et al. (2014). Emerging markets in transition: Growth prospects and challenges. International Monetary Fund.
- Den Butter, F., & Es-Saghir, A. (2013). Productivity effects of trade and product innovations: An empirical analysis for 13 OECD countries. Applied Economics, 45, 4412-4418. doi: 10.1080/00036846.2013.786167.
- Elder, J., & Serletis, A. (2010). Oil price uncertainty. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 42(6), 1137-1159. Retrieved November 11, 2020, from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=908675
- Global Innovation Index. (n.d.). About the Global Innovation Index. Retrieved November 11, 2020, from https://www.globalinnovationindex.org/about-gii#reports
- Guellec, D., & Van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. (2001). R&D and productivity growth: Panel data analysis of 16 OECD countries. doi: 10.1787/652870318341.
- Guellec, D., & Van Pottelsberghe De La Potterie, B. (2003). The impact of public R&D expenditure on business R&D. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 225-243.
- Jorgenson, D.W., Vu, K.M. (2016). The ICT revolution, world economic growth, and policy issues. Telecommunications Policy, 40(5), 383-397. doi: 10.1016/J.TELPOL.2016.01.002.
- Kim, Y.E., & Loayza, N.V (2017). Productivity and its determinants: Innovation, education, efficiency, infrastructure, and institutions. Retrieved May 27, 2018, from http://pubdocs.worldbank.org/en/378031511165998244/Productivity-and-its-determinants-25-October-2017.pdf
- Kim, Y.E., & Loayza, N.V. (2019). Productivity growth: Patterns and determinants across the world. Economia, 42(84), 36-93. doi: 10.18800/economia.201902.003.
- Maslennikov, O.V. (2015). Klassifikaciya metodov rascheta sovokupnoj faktornoj proizvoditel’- nosti [Classification of methods of calculation of cumulative factorial productivity]. Proceedings of Voronezh State University, (4), 172-175. (In Russ.)
- Matyushok, V.M. (2011). The thorny path to innovatove economy. Bulletin of the Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, (S5), 141-157. (In Russ.)
- Matyushok, V.M., & Kravtsov, A. A. (2011). European way to innovative economy. Bulletin of the Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, (4), 44-54. (In Russ.)
- OECD (2001). Measuring productivity - OECD manual. doi: 10.1787/9789264194519-en.
- Reshetnikova, M. (2020). Venture capital market in China: A new approach to innovation management. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3984247
- Sinha, R. (2017). Long-term growth scenarios for Bangladesh. WPS 7952. Retrieved November 11, 2020, from http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/131961485274754618/Long-term-growth
- Solow, R. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70, 65-94.
- Total Economy Database. (2019). Key Findings. Retrieved March 1, 2020, from https://www.conference-board.org/data/economydatabase/
Қосымша файлдар
