Analytical management models in the transport complex resource allocation system

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Background. The management of resource allocation in a transport complex is significantly complicated by the presence of uncertain informational states, a characteristic feature of such complex, multi-level systems. Traditional management models often prove inadequate as they fail to fully account for this stochastic uncertainty and the ergatic nature of the system, which involves interaction between heterogeneous technical elements and human collectives with potentially conflicting goals. This necessitates the development of specialized analytical models based on robust mathematical apparatuses, such as entropy theory, to formalize decision-making processes and increase the efficiency of resource distribution under conditions of incomplete information.

Purpose. To develop analytical models for managing the resource allocation system in a transport complex, based on the principles of entropy measurement and the theory of decision-making under uncertainty, aimed at formalizing the procedures for evaluating efficiency and selecting optimal solutions.

Materials and methods. The study employs the theoretical foundations of K. Shannon’s entropy to quantify uncertainty within the system. The core methodological tool is the model for researching second-order uncertainty functions, designed for systems with discrete states, such as resource allocation systems. To form a system of probability distributions for informational states, a model based on Fishburn’s estimates is used. The mathematical apparatus includes constructing matrices of evaluation functionals (2) for various decision options and criteria. The analysis of solution efficiency is conducted using a graphical model for a set of mutually exclusive options, particularly for, and for a priori probability distributions.

Results. A graphical model for determining efficiency within the system was developed and presented, illustrating the solution space for a given preference of a priori probabilities. The application of the model based on Fishburn’s estimates was shown to solve the primary task of reducing uncertainty. However, it was established that this model alone does not identify the probability characteristics corresponding to the maximum of the evaluation functional across the entire set of external environment states. To address this, the model was supplemented with a targeted condition (4). Furthermore, the fundamental differences between the method of Fishburn’s estimates and alternative methods – the zoning method by the principle of dominance of probabilities of possible states of the external environment (DPPSE) and the zoning method by the principle of maintaining the hierarchical ratio of probabilities of possible states of the external environment (MHRPSE) – were demonstrated. A comparative analysis of these methods was conducted using a hypothetical example.

About the authors

Roman A. Khalturin

State University of Management

Author for correspondence.
Email: ra_khalturin@guu.ru

Candidate of Economic Sciences, Leading Research Fellow

 

Russian Federation, 99, Ryazansky Ave., Moscow, 109542, Russian Federation

Maxim G. Pletnev

State University of Management

Email: mg_pletnev@guu.ru

Head of the Research Coordination Department

 

Russian Federation, 99, Ryazansky Ave., Moscow, 109542, Russian Federation

Igor Yu. Kashtanov

State University of Management

Email: iyu_kashtanov@guu.ru

Postgraduate Student

 

Russian Federation, 99, Ryazansky Ave., Moscow, 109542, Russian Federation

References

  1. Pospelov, D. A. (1986). Situational management: Theory and practice. Moscow: Nauka.
  2. Tarasenko, F. P. (2004). Applied systems analysis (Science and art of problem solving): Textbook. Tomsk: Tomsk University Press. 186 pp. ISBN: 5-7511-1838-3. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/TFPWDF
  3. Ventzel, E. S. (2001). Operations research. Problems, principles, methodology. Moscow: Vysshaya Shkola. 208 pp.
  4. Fishburn, P. S. (1978). Utility theory for decision making. Moscow: Nauka. 352 pp.
  5. Yakushev, A. A. (2012). Making managerial decisions based on a systems approach and mathematical modeling. Modern Problems of Science and Education, 6. Retrieved from https://www.science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=7936 (accessed: 10.02.2023). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/TODQYD
  6. Terentyev, A. V. (2015). Methods for solving road transport problems. Modern Problems of Science and Education, 1. Retrieved from http://www.science-education.ru/125-19863. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/TXUWAP
  7. Prudovsky, B. D., & Terentyev, A. V. (2015). Methods for determining the Pareto set in some linear programming problems. Proceedings of the Mining Institute, 211, 86–90. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/TQMGRJ
  8. Terentyev, A. V., Efimenko, D. B., & Karelina, M. Yu. (2017). Zoning methods as methods for optimizing road transport processes. Bulletin of Civil Engineers, 6(65), 291–294. https://doi.org/10.23968/1999-5571-2017-14-6-291-294. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YPNFZF
  9. Terentyev, A., Evtiukov, S., & Karelina, M. (2017). A method for multi-criteria evaluation of the complex safety characteristic of a road vehicle. Transportation Research Procedia, 36, 149–156.
  10. Moiseev, V. V., Terentyev, A. V., Stroev, V. V., & Karelina, M. Yu. (2018). Enhancement of economic efficiency of transport performance using multi-criteria estimation. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, 61, 167–171. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/WHRSRR
  11. Terentiev, A. V., Evtiukov, S. S., & Karelina, E. A. (2020). Development of zoning method for solving economic problems of optimal resource allocation to objects of various importance in context of incomplete information. In Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research (Vol. 128, pp. 765–772). International Scientific Conference «Far East Con» (ISCFEC 2020).
  12. Terentyev, A. V., Karelina, M. Yu., Cherepnina, T. Yu., Linnik, D. A., & Demin, V. A. (2020). Digital object-oriented control models in automobile road complex systems. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 832, 012058.
  13. Temkin, I. O., Deryabin, S. A., & Konov, I. S. (2017). Fuzzy models of interaction control for mobile objects in the mining and transport complex (MTC). In Step into the Future: Artificial Intelligence and Digital Economy: Proceedings of the 1st International Scientific and Practical Conference (December 4–5, Vol. 1, pp. 246–253). Moscow: State University of Management. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YVSQMQ
  14. Pugachev, I. N., Sheshera, N. G., & Grigorov, D. E. (2024). Research on traffic flow intensity using the Deep Learning method. World of Transport, 22(2), 12–24. https://doi.org/10.30932/1992-3252-2024-22-2-2. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/VGTIPB
  15. Jiang, B., & Fei, Y. (2016). Vehicle speed prediction by two-level data-driven models in vehicular networks. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems (November).

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2025 Khalturin R.A., Pletnev M.G., Kashtanov I.Y.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).