Truths and lies in a TV series about “Dostoevsky beyond the textbook”
- Authors: Saraskina L.I.1
-
Affiliations:
- The State Institute for Art Studies
- Issue: Vol 7, No 4 (2020)
- Pages: 70-105
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2409-5788/article/view/286556
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.15393/j10.art.2020.5061
- ID: 286556
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The paper offers a detailed analysis of Dostoevsky, a historical and biographical feature TV serial (in eight episodes), produced in 2011, when the writer’s 190th anniversary was celebrated. The film was directed by V. I. Khotinenko, the script was written by E. Ya. Volodarsky. The authors of the series claimed that their objective was to create an image of “Dostoevsky beyond the textbook”, wholly (or largely) unknown to today’s audience. But the authors did not explain what they meant by “Dostoevsky beyond the textbook”, nor, for that matter, by the “textbook” version. Professional expertise had found numerous gross distortions of both Dostoevsky’s biography and Russian history in the script. Nevertheless, after certain corrections by the film director, the flawed script was accepted as the basis for the series, which, in the end, proved to be as flawed. The objective of the film, as defined by the director, was to show the “human dimension” Dostoevsky, was realized in a very peculiar manner: for the sake of pseudo-dramatization, the writers’ real experiences in the fatal moments of his life were replaced with fictitious experiences; many events, well known and well documented, were deliberately misrepresented. For the film director, Dostoevsky was chiefly interesting as a person burdened with many vices, whose biography had been full of extraordinary striking episodes. The film director, by his arbitrary will, ascribed to Dostoevsky the desires, passions and actions of some of his fictional characters; this dubious, though frequently employed, technique has been readily utilized in the series. Numerous erotic episodes were supposed to demonstrate to today’s audience that nothing human was alien to Dostoevsky. His literary activity, his public readings (which he liked so much) were presented as bait used to lure the victims of his male lust. The series showed, as it were, that the writer had rehearsed, in his private space, the would-be crimes of his characters. The real, wellknown, Dostoevsky has remained outside the series. Viewers will not find his work on the novel The Possessed, the creative history of The Brothers Karamazov, the inauguration of the monument to Pushkin in Moscow, Dostoevsky’s Pushkin speech, his dramatic relations with Pobedonostsev, his friendship with S. A. Tolstaya (the widow of Alexei K. Tolstoy), the severe illness of his last days, his death, or his funeral, unprecedented in Russia.
About the authors
Liudmila I. Saraskina
The State Institute for Art Studies
Author for correspondence.
Email: l.saraskina@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4844-4930
Doctor of Philology, Chief Research Fellow of the Mass Media Arts Department
Russian Federation, пер. Козицкий, 5, г. Москва, 125009References
- Andrianova I. S. “Strakhov’s Slander”, or the Protest of Dostoevsky’s Widow and Nephew. In: Neizvestnyy Dostoevskiy [The Unknown Dostoevsky], 2015, no. 3, pp. 84–95. Available at: https://unknown-dostoevsky.ru/files/redaktor_pdf/1449057614.pdf (accessed on July 7, 2020). doi: 10.15393/j10.art.2015.2485 (In Russ.)
- Basinskiy P., Saraskina L. A Genius in the Grip of Vice. The Series “Dostoevsky” Has Ended on the TV Channel “Russia-1”. In: Rossiyskaya gazeta, 2011, 27 May. (In Russ.)
- Bograd G. So Where is the Manuscript of “The Brothers Karamazov”? In: Novoe russkoe slovo, 1996, 12–13 October. (In Russ.)
- Vasil’ev K. Dostoevsky with a Bag on His Head, or the Vain Search for Historical Truth. In: Sever, 2017, no. 9–10. Available at: https://klauzura.ru/2019/03/dostoevskij-s-meshkom- na-golove-ili-naprasnye-poiski-istoricheskoj-pravdy/ (accessed on July 7, 2020). (In Russ.)
- Grossman L. P. A. G. Dostoevskaya and Her “Memoirs”. In: Dostoevskaya A. G. Vospominaniya [Dostoevskaya A. G. Memoirs]. Moscow, Leningrad, 1925, pp. 7–18. (In Russ.)
- Dostoevskaya A. G. Vospominaniya. 1846–1917 [Memoirs. 1846–1917]. Moscow, Boslen Publ., 2015. 768 p. (In Russ.)
- Dostoevskaya A. G. Dnevnik 1867 goda [Diary for the Year 1867]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1993. 452 p. (In Russ.)
- Dostoevskaya L. F. Dostoevskiy v izobrazhenii svoey docheri [Dostoevsky as Figured by His Daughter L. Dostoevskaya]. St. Petersburg, Andreev i synov’ya Publ., 1992, 245 p. (In Russ.)
- Zakharov V. N. Problemy izucheniya Dostoevskogo [The Problems of Studying Dostoevsky]. Petrozavodsk, Petrozavodsk State University Publ., 1978. 110 p. (In Russ.)
- Zakharov V. N. Unsent Letter from Dostoevsky to Turgenev. In: Dostoevskiy i sovremennost’: tezisy vystupleniy na «Starorusskikh chteniyakh» [Dostoevsky and Modernity: Speech Thesis of the Studies in Staraya Russa]. Novgorod, 1991, part 1, pp. 61–66. (In Russ.)
- Zakharov V. N. What Did Dostoevsky’s Archive of the 1840s Disappear? In: Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie [Knowledge. Understanding. Skill]. Moscow, 2014, no. 3, pp. 287–296. (In Russ.)
- Zakharov V. N. F. M. Dostoevsky’s Polemic Notes About N. N. Strakhov. In: Russkaya literatura, 2017, no. 4, pp. 61–69. (In Russ.)
- Zil’bershteyn I. S. Forgotten and Rediscovered Letters of Dostoevsky. In: Literaturnoe nasledstvo [Literary Heritage]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1973, vol. 86, pp. 114–152. (In Russ.)
- Ivanov A. The Fate of the Manuscript “The Brothers Karamazov”. In: Novyy zhurnal [The New Review]. New York, 1980, book 138, pp. 193–207. (In Russ.)
- Nechaeva V. S. Opisanie rukopisey F. M. Dostoevskogo [The Description of Fedor Dostoevsky’s Manuscripts]. Moscow, 1957. 589 p. (In Russ.)
- Ornatskaya T. I. On the History of the Loss of the Manuscript of the Novel “The Brothers Karamazov. In: Dostoevskiy. Materialy i issledovaniya [Dostoevsky. Materials and Researches]. St. Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 1992, vol. 10, pp. 181–193. (In Russ.)
- L. N. Tolstoy i N. N. Strakhov: Polnoe sobranie perepiski [L. N. Tolstoy and N. N. Strakhov: Complete Сollection of Сorrespondence]. Мoscow, Ottawa, 2003, vol. 2. 1079 p. (In Russ.)
- Saraskina L. I. Dostoevsky. Moscow, Molodaya gvardiya Publ., 2013, pp. 282–302. (In Russ.)
- Tvardovskiy A. T. Sobranie sochineniy: v 5 tomakh [Collected Works: in 5 Vols]. Moscow, Khudozhestvennaya literatura Publ., 1971, vol. 5: Articles and Notes on Literature. 517 p. (In Russ.)
- Timofeeva V. V. (O. Pochinkovskaya). A Year of Work with a Famous Writer. In: F. M. Dostoevskiy v vospominaniyakh sovremennikov: v 2 tomakh [F. M. Dostoevsky in Memoirs of His Contemporaries: in 2 Vols]. Moscow, Khudozhestvennaya literatura Publ., 1964, vol. 2, 137–196 p. (In Russ.)
- Tikhomirov B. N. The Mystery of the Missing Manuscripts of “The Brothers Karamazov” (Facts and Hypotheses). In: Roman F. M. Dostoevskogo «Brat’ya Karamazovy». Sovremennoe sostoyanie izucheniya [Dostoevsky’s Novel “The Brothers Karamazov”: The Current State of Study]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2007, pp. 765–796. Available at: http://dostoevskiy-lit.ru/ dostoevskiy/kritika/sbornik-bratya-karamazovy/tihomirov-sankt-peterburg.htm (accessed on November 21, 2020). (In Russ.)
Supplementary files
