WAS PAVEL ARISTOV, PRISONER OF THE OMSK JAIL, A PROTOTYPE OF ARCADIY IVANOVICH SVIDRIGAYLOV?
- Authors: Tikhomirov B.N.1
-
Affiliations:
- The F. M. Dostoevsky Literary-Memorial Museum in St. Petersburg
- Issue: Vol 4, No 4 (2017)
- Pages: 48-56
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2409-5788/article/view/298072
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.15393/j10.art.2017.3302
- ID: 298072
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The article studies the manuscripts of F. M. Dostoevsky’s three workbooks of the years 1865–1867 (the Russian State Archive of Literature and Arts. Fund 212.1.3, 212.1.4 and 212.1.5). As a result of textual analysis, a recognized chronology of preliminary notes referring to the novel “Crime and Punishment” provided by the academic Complete Works of the writer, was significantly amended. The article particularly envisages some sketches that mention Aristov, a character named after a prisoner who then served his sentence in the Omsk jail with Dostoevsky. Since the 1930s following V. L. Komarovich and L. P. Grossman, Aristov has been traditionally seen as a prototype of Svidrigaylov, one of the protagonists of “Crime and Punishment”. Thanks to a critical analysis of these notes in terms of the corrected chronology, the article proves that Aristov from the early sketches in the first two notebooks of 1865 (Funds 212.1.3 and 212.1.4) and Svidrigaylov whose name appears only in the third notebook (Fund 212.1.5) containing preliminary materials for the final published edition of the novel, have no inner connection. This fact allowed the author of the article to reconsider the idea of the creative history of “Crime and Punishment” offered by V. L. Komarovich and accepted in the Complete Works of Dostoevsky at the moment when the writer leaves the narrative form in person of the hero and begins his work on the final edition where the narration is conducted in person of the “all-knowing author”.
About the authors
Boris N. Tikhomirov
The F. M. Dostoevsky Literary-Memorial Museum in St. Petersburg
Author for correspondence.
Email: btikhomirov@rambler.ru
Doctor of Philology, Deputy Director of Academic Affairs
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgReferences
- Grossman L. P. The City and People of “Crime and Punishment”. In: Dostoevskiy F. M. Prestuplenie i nakazanie [Dostoevsky F. M. Crime and Punishment]. Moscow, Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo khudozhestvennoy literatury Publ., 1935, pp. 5–52. (In Russ.)
- Komarovich V. L. Dostoevsky’s Literary Heritage in the Years of Revolution. Overview of the Publications of 1917–1933. In: Literaturnoe nasledstvo [Literary Heritage]. Moscow, Zhurnal’no-gazetnoe ob’edinenie Publ., 1934, vol. 15, pp. 271–278. (In Russ.)
- Opul’skaya L. D. The First Workbook: Preparatory Materials for the Novel. In: Dostoevskiy F. M. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy: v 30 tomakh [Dostoevsky F. M. Complete Works: in 30 Vols]. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1973, vol. 7, pp. 265–322. (In Russ.)
- Tikhomirov B. N. “A Controversial Issue of Chronology of Hand-Written Materials for Dostoevsky’s Novel ‘Crime and Punishment’”. In: Dostoevskiy: Materialy i issledovaniya [Dostoevsky: Materials and Researches]. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1987, vol. 7, pp. 53–64. (In Russ.)
- Tikhomirov B. N. Another Svidrigaylov: An Unrealized Intention of Dostoevsky at the Beginning of 1867 (Remarks and Suppositions). In: Tri veka russkoy literatury: Aktual’nye aspekty izucheniya [Three Centuries of Russian Literature. Essential Aspects of Studying]. St. Petersburg, Moscow, Irkutsk, 2011, issue 25, pp. 141–152. (In Russ.)
- Shklovskiy V. B. Za i protiv: Zametki o Dostoevskom [Pro and Contra: Notes on Dostoevsky]. Moscow, Sovetskiy pisatel’ Publ., 1957. 259 p. (In Russ.)
Supplementary files
