Legal recognition of artificial intelligence technologies in the context of the constitutional values of the Russian state

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to form approaches to the public legal regulation of artificial intelligence technologies. The subject of the work is the social relations that have developed in the field of legal registration of modern digital technologies of "weak" artificial intelligence - computer vision, natural language processing, speech recognition and synthesis, as well as intellectual decision support. The relevance of the research is determined by the need to bring the content of legal acts in line with the current level of information technology development. The work is based on a combination of general philosophical, general scientific and special methods of cognition – concrete historical analysis, formal legal (dogmatic) method, as well as the method of comparative jurisprudence. The author criticizes the anthropomorphic approach to understanding artificial intelligence, based on the analogy of technology with the human mind, implemented in the terminological apparatus of existing legal acts. It is proposed to limit the legal interpretation of artificial intelligence to a set of specific information technologies that can be used by a person in solving applied problems. The analysis of possible directions of constitutional and legal recognition of artificial intelligence technologies and the legal consequences of their influence on the implementation of the constitutional values of equality and privacy is carried out. The argumentation in favor of a combination of social and technical regulation of relations in the field of application of artificial intelligence technologies is proposed.

References

  1. Russell S, Norvig P. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (4th Edition). Pearson 2020, ISBN 9780134610993.
  2. Цифровая экономика: актуальные направления правового регулирования: научно-практическое пособие / М.О. Дьяконова, А.А. Ефремов, О.А. Зайцев и др.; под ред. И.И. Кучерова, С.А. Синицына.-Москва: ИЗиСП, НОРМА, 2022. – С. 376 с.-doi: 10.12737/1839690.
  3. Базы знаний интеллектуальных систем / Т.А. Гаврилова, В.Ф. Хорошевский-СПб: Питер, 2000.-384 c.
  4. ПНСТ 553-2021 Информационные технологии (ИТ). Искусственный интеллект. Термины и определения. М.: ФГБУ «РСТ», 2021.
  5. Филипова И.А. Правовое регулирование искусственного интеллекта учебное пособие, 2-е издание, обновленное и дополненное / И.А. Филипова. – Нижний Новгород: Нижегородский госуниверситет, 2022. – 275 c.
  6. Gender Shades: Intersectional Accuracy Disparities in Commercial Gender Classification. Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency, PMLR 81:77-91, 2018. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3Fc8fTd.
  7. Amazon scraps secret AI recruiting tool that showed bias against women.-URL: https://bit.ly/3Bfw5MI (дата обращения: 02.04.2023).
  8. An individual-level socioeconomic measure for assessing algorithmic bias in health care settings: A case for HOUSES index. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3W3pI7o. doi: 10.1101/2021.08.10.21261833.
  9. A Local Law to amend the administrative code of the city of New York, in relation to automated employment decision tools.-URL: https://bit.ly/3iOkrlL (дата обращения: 02.04.2023).

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).