The Secrecy Preservation System in the Manhattan Project

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Nuclear weapons, which have become one of the key pillars of maintaining the so-called “long peace” in the postwar world, were first developed in the United States during World War II. This achievement was the result of a collaborative effort by an international group of scientists, working under American leadership and supported by the USA industrial and technological resources. From the outset, secrecy was a central concern—not only regarding technical details, but the very existence of the program. Even the term “Manhattan Project” was deliberately chosen to obscure the nature of the initiative. This paper examines the methods employed by the Manhattan Project leadership to maintain secrecy throughout the development of the atomic bomb. It also explores how these efforts influenced the pace of the project, the emergence of the unique “secret city” culture, and the safety protocols governing work at various sites. The analysis draws primarily on personal sources, including memoirs and interviews with project participants. While the question of secrecy has occasionally been addressed in broader studies of the Manhattan Project, it has never been the subject of focused academic inquiry. In Russian historiography it is often acknowledged but seldom explored in depth too. This study aims to help fill that gap. In light of ongoing international tensions and continuing efforts by non-nuclear states to obtain nuclear capabilities, research into the history of nuclear development and proliferation remains particularly relevant. The paper concludes that secrecy was not merely an operational necessity, but a formative factor in the very structure and management of the Manhattan Project. This imperative shaped the project’s organization and contributed to a range of scientific, engineering, and administrative challenges. Nonetheless, the project met its objectives within a reasonable timeframe without any major security breaches.

About the authors

Ilia Alexandrovich Ripak

Email: ilka-95@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0009-3856-7006

References

  1. Groves L.R. Now It Can Be Told: The Story of Manhattan Project. N.Y.: Harper & Row, 1962. 464 p.
  2. Howes R.H. Their Day in the Sun: Women of the Manhattan Project. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1999. 264 p.
  3. Hunner J. Inventing Los Alamos: The Growth of an Atomic Community. Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma Press, 2004. 288 p.
  4. Kelly C.C. The Manhattan Project: The Birth of the Atomic Bomb in the Words of Its Creators, Eyewitnesses, and Historians. N.Y.: Black Dog & Leventhal, 2007. 495 p.
  5. Norris R. Racing for the Bomb: General Leslie R. Groves, the Manhattan Project's Indispensable Man. New Hampshire: Steerforth Press, 2002. 722 p.
  6. Sanger S.L., Craig W. Working on the Bomb: An Oral History of WWII Hanford. Portland: Continuing Education Press, 1995. 264 p.
  7. Schweber S.S. In the Shadow of the Bomb: Oppenheimer, Bethe, and the Moral Responsibility of the Scientist. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007. 260 p.
  8. Teller E., Shoolery J.L. Memoirs: A Twentieth-Century Journey in Science and Politics. Cambridge: Perseus Publishing, 2001. 640 p.
  9. Фейнман Р. Радость познания. М.: ACT, 2021. 352 с.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).