The Ontology of Polyphonic Visual Images

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

This article attempts to build an ontological model of a visual image based on the principle of polyphony – a plurality of autonomous but interacting semantic voices. The category of polyphony, borrowed from musical and literary traditions, is reinterpreted as a fundamental characteristic of visual existence. The historical and modern manifestations of polyphonic images are analyzed, from ancient symbolic compositions to digital multimedia installations. A categorical framework is being developed that includes integration and differentiation, resonation, mutual activity of components, ontological valence, and contextual openness. The concept of a co-image is introduced as a minimal unit of visual polyphony – an autonomous image that preserves integrity while simultaneously coexisting with others. It is argued that a polyphonic visual image is not a closed representation, but an ontological event in which being manifests itself through a dialogue of multiple voices distributed across different layers of perception, time, and cultural context. The research uses an interdisciplinary approach combining methods of visual analysis, philosophical hermeneutics and cultural studies. The principles of phenomenological description, structural analysis and comparative method are used in the study of polyphonic visual images. The scientific novelty of the research lies in the development of an ontological model of the visual image, where polyphony is a fundamental category of being. For the first time, the concept of a co-image as a unit of visual polyphony was introduced and a categorical apparatus for analyzing such structures was developed. The study demonstrates that a polyphonic image is not a static composition, but an ontological event where being is manifested through a dialogue of multiple voices. It is revealed that valence as a quantitative characteristic determines the potential of a visual object to retain multiple meanings. The results obtained allow us to consider polyphony not as a metaphor, but as a basic structure of visual experience, where multiplicity does not destroy integrity, but creates it, turning the image into a dynamic field of interaction of various semantic layers. Polyphony is revealed as a special type of integrity, in which the difference is not eliminated, but becomes its basis.

About the authors

Eldar Fazilovich Aminov

Email: eldar@aminov.ru

References

  1. Курт, Э. Основы линеарного контрапункта. Мелодическая полифония Баха / Э. Курт; пер. с нем.; под ред. и с вступ. ст. Б. Астафьева. – М.: Музгиз, 1931. – 304 с.
  2. Бахтин, М. М. Проблемы поэтики Достоевского / М. М. Бахтин. – 3-е изд. – М.: Художественная литература, 1972. – 470 с. EDN: VQMVAT
  3. Бахтин, М. М. Эстетика словесного творчества / М. М. Бахтин; сост. С. Г. Бочаров. – М.: Искусство, 1979. – 424 с. EDN: VQMUFP
  4. Барт, Р. Избранные работы: Семиотика. Поэтика / Р. Барт; пер. с фр., вступ. ст. и коммент. Ю. М. Лотмана; под общ. ред. В. И. Тюпина. – М.: Прогресс, 1994. – 592 с.
  5. Кристева, Ю. Бахтин, слово, диалог и роман / Ю. Кристева // Вестник Московского университета. Серия 9: Филология. – 1995. – № 1. – С. 97-124.
  6. Mitchell, W. J. T. What Do Pictures Want? The Lives and Loves of Images / W. J. T. Mitchell. – Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005. – 380 p.
  7. Mirzoeff, N. An Introduction to Visual Culture / N. Mirzoeff. – 2nd ed. – London: Routledge, 2009. – 320 p.
  8. Elkins, J. Visual Studies: A Skeptical Introduction / J. Elkins. – New York: Routledge, 2003. – 253 p.
  9. Гадамер, Г.-Г. Актуальность прекрасного / Г.-Г. Гадамер; пер. с нем. – М.: Искусство, 1991. – 207 с. – (Эстетика и теория искусства). – Перевод с немецкого В. С. Малахова; послесловие и комментарии В. С. Малахова, В. В. Бибихина.
  10. Мифологический словарь / [А. А. Аншба и др.]; гл. ред. Е. М. Мелетинский. – М.: Советская энциклопедия, 1990. – 672 с.
  11. Мифы народов мира / Под ред. С. А. Токарева. – М.: Советская энциклопедия, 1992. – Т. 2. – С. 525. ISBN 5-85270-072-X (т. 2)
  12. Гринцер, П. А. Шива / П. А. Гринцер // Мифы народов мира: энциклопедия в 2 т. / гл. ред. С. А. Токарев. – 2-е изд. – М.: Советская энциклопедия, 1988. – Т. 2: К-Я. – С. 642-644.
  13. Boring, E. G. A new ambiguous figure / E. G. Boring // American Journal of Psychology. – 1930. – Vol. 42, № 3. – P. 445.
  14. Гадамер, Г.-Г. Актуальность прекрасного / Г.-Г. Гадамер; пер. с нем.; постскр. и коммент. В. С. Малахова, В. В. Бибихина. – Москва: Искусство, 1991. – 366 с.
  15. Descharnes, R. Salvador Dalí: The Work, The Man / R. Descharnes. – New York: Harry N. Abrams, 1984. – 408 p.
  16. Delanda, M. A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity / M. Delanda. – London: Continuum, 2006. – 148 p.
  17. Latour, B. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory / B. Latour. – Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. – 301 p.
  18. Bryant, L. The Democracy of Objects / L. Bryant. – Ann Arbor: Open Humanities Press, 2011. – 346 p.
  19. Ramachandran, V. S. The Science of Art: A Neurological Theory of Aesthetic Experience / V. S. Ramachandran, W. Hirstein // Journal of Consciousness Studies. – 1999. – Vol. 6, № 6-7. – P. 15-51.
  20. Аминов, Э. Ф. Полифония действительности: основы полифонического мышления / Э. Ф. Аминов. – М.: ЦДО "Перспектива", 2022. – 168 с.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).