Ethical regulation of economic relations: agenda change and values correction

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The article deals with the current situation in the field of ethical regulation of economic relations. The author shows that interest in the ethical regulation of the economy increases during the transitional historical periods, which are characterized by a fundamental transformation of all aspects of society’s life, both the formation of capitalism and the formation of Industry 4.0. The idea of replenishing ethical standards in the field of professional labor activity is substantiated on the open data of sociological research, the theoretical separation of market and ethical thinking, the contraction of the sphere of pure ethical regulation (М. Sandel). It is expressed in the transition from the recognition ethics to the trust ethics, the latter goes beyond the boundaries of interpersonal relations, forming a culture of “institutional trust”. Modern practices of ethical codification of companies’ activities are greatly influenced by the problems of the value dimension of digitalization, automation, artificial intelligence, “green economy”, inclusion in the business culture of organizations.

About the authors

Svetlana V. Solovyova

Samara State Transport University

Author for correspondence.
Email: metaphisica2@gmail.com

Doctor in Philosophy, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Philosophy and History of Science

Russian Federation, Samara

References

  1. Boltanski L, K’yapello E. Novyy dukh kapitalizma Transl. from French. Ed. by S. Fokin. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie; 2011. (In Russ.)
  2. Brodovskaya EV. Digital citizens, digital society and digital citizenship. Vlast’. 2019;(27):65–69. (In Russ.). doi: 10.31171/vlast.v27i4.6587
  3. Veber M. Protestantskaya etika i dukh kapitalizma [Internet]. (In Russ.). Available from: https://www.gumer.info/bibliotek_Buks/Sociolog/Veb_PrEt/04.php. Accessed: 08.11.2021.
  4. Veselov YuV. Doverie i spravedlivost’: moral’nye osnovaniya sovremennogo ekonomicheskogo obshchestva. Moscow: Aspekt Press; 2011. (In Russ.)
  5. Veselov YuV, Kapustkina EV, Minina VN. Ekonomika i sotsiologiya doveriya. Saint Petersburg; 2004. (In Russ.)
  6. Giddens A. Posledstviya sovremennosti. Transl. from Engl. G.K. Ol’hovikov, D.A. Kibal’chich. Moscow: Praksis; 2011. (In Russ.)
  7. Gosudarstvo kak platforma: lyudi i tehnologii. Moscow, 2019 [Internet]. (In Russ.). Available from: https://www.ranepa.ru/images/News/2019-01/16-01-2019-GovPlatform.pdf. Accessed: 10.10.2021.
  8. Dmitriev TA. Sokrushitel’naya sovremennost’ Entoni Giddensa. In: Giddens E. Posledstviya sovremennosti. Transl. from Engl. G.K. Ol’hovikov, D.A. Kibal’chich. Moscow: Praksis; 2011. Р. 7–106. (In Russ.)
  9. Zombart V. Burzhua: k istorii duhovnogo razvitiya sovremennogo ekonomicheskogo cheloveka [Internet]. (In Russ.). Available from: http://az.lib.ru/z/ zombart_w/text_1913_der_bourgeois.shtml. Accessed: 15.10.2021.
  10. Kodeks korporativnoi etiki Sbera [Internet]. (In Russ.). Available from: https://www.sberbank.com/common/img/uploaded/files/pdf/normative_docs/sberbank_code_of_corporate_ethics.pdf. Accessed: 17.10.2021.
  11. Latov YuV. Institutional trust as social capital in modern Russia (based on monitoring results). Polis. Political studies. 2021;(5):161–175. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17976/jpps/2021.05.11
  12. Lyuter M. Lektsii k Poslaniyu k Galatam [Internet]. (In Russ.). Available from: https://www.gumer.info/bogoslov_Buks/protestant/lyuter/gal01.php. Accessed: 03.10.2021.
  13. Markov L. Through ESG to Sustainable Development [Internet]. Gudok. 2021;(193(27287)). (In Russ.). Available from: https://gudok.ru/newspaper/?ID=1583552&archive=2021.10.21. Accessed: 14.10.2021.
  14. Otsenka ekologicheskikh, social’nykh i upravlencheskikh riskov (ESG). Sber [Internet]. (In Russ.) Available from: https://www.spglobal.com/_assets/documents/ratings/ru/pdf/2021-11-29-new-sber-group-assigned-esg-evaluation-of-67-ru.pdf. Accessed: 28.11.2021.
  15. Perov VJu, Tazenkova PA. The problem of moral trust. Discourses of Ethics. Almanac. 2012;1:152–170. (In Russ.)
  16. Petrov M, Burov V, Shkljaruk M, Sharov A. Gosudarstvo kak platforma. (Kiber)gosudarstvo dlya cifrovoi ekonomiki cifrovaya transformatsiya [Internet]. Centr strategicheskih razrabotok. Moscow; 2018. (In Russ.). Available from: https://www.csr.ru/upload/iblock/313/3132b2de9ccef0db1eecd56071b98f5f.pdf. Accessed: 16.10.2021.
  17. Politika v oblasti social’noi i ekologicheskoi otvetstvennosti, korporativnogo upravleniya i ustoichivogo razvitiya [Internet]. PAO Sberbank. Moscow; 2021. (In Russ.). Available from: https://www.sberbank.com/common/img/uploaded/files/pdf/normative_docs/sber_esg_policy_rus.pdf. Accessed: 05.11.2021.
  18. Porokhovskaya TI. Trust as a moral phenomenon. Scientific notes of the V.I. Vernadsky. Philosophy. Political science. Culturology. 2018;4:(70(1)):56–64. (In Russ.)
  19. Pravila delovoi i korporativnoi etiki gruppy kompanii Yandeks. [Internet]. (In Russ.). Available from: https://yandex.ru/company/rules/code/. Accessed: 06.10.2021.
  20. Reuckaja GM. Trust as a category of professional ethics. Bulletin of the Academy of Economic Security of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2015;(6):115–118. (In Russ.)
  21. Sasaki M, Davydenko VA, Latov JuV, et al. Problems and paradoxes of the analysis of institutional trust as an element of social capital in modern Russia. Journal of Institutional Research. 2009;1(1):20–35. (In Russ.)
  22. Seligmen A. Problema doveriya. Transl. from Engl. I.I. Myurberg, L.V. Soboleva. Moscow; 2002. (In Russ.)
  23. Solomin VP, Pigrov KS, Sultanov KV. Dilettantism as a problem of the new European civilization. Society. Environment. Development. 2015;(4(37)):68–73. (In Russ.)
  24. Sjendel M. Chto nel’zya kupit’ za den’gi. Moral’nye ogranicheniya svobodnogo rynka. Transl. from Engl. N. Il’ina. Moscow; 2013. (In Russ.)
  25. Fukuyama F. Doverie: social’nye dobrodeteli i put’ k protsvetaniyu. Transl. from Engl. Moscow; 2004. (In Russ.)
  26. Hausman DM, Makferson MS. Filosofskie osnovaniya magistral’nogo napravleniya normativnoi ekonomiki. In: Filosofiya ekonomiki. Antologiya. Ed. by D. Hausman. Transl. from Engl. Moscow; 2012. Р. 269–300. (In Russ.)
  27. Sztompka P. Doverie – osnova obshhestva. Transl. from Polish N.V. Morozova. Moscow: Logos; 2012. (In Russ.)
  28. Etika professora. Opyt kollektivnoi refleksii: kollektivnaya monografiya. Ed. by V.I. Bakshtanovsky. Tyumen’; 2020. (In Russ.)
  29. Best АL, Fletcher FE, Kadono M, Warren RC. Institutional distrust among African Americans and building trustworthiness in the COVID-19 response: implications for ethical public health practice. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2021;32(1):90–98. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2021.0010
  30. ESG Assets Rising to $50 Trillion Will Reshape $140.5 Trillion of Global AUM by 2025, Finds Bloomberg Intelligence. Available from: https://www.bloomberg.com/company/press/esg-assets-rising-to-50-trillion-will-reshape-140-5-trillion-of-global-aum-by-2025-finds-bloomberg-intelligence/. Accessed: 15.10.2021.
  31. Distel B, Koelmann H, Schmolke F, Becker J. The Role of trust for citizens’ adoption of public e-services. Trust and Communication. 2021:163–184. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-72945-5_8
  32. Edelman Trust Barometer 2020. Global Report. Available from: https://cdn2.hubspot.net/hubfs/440941/Trust%20Barometer%202020/2020%20Edelman%20Trust%20Barometer%20Global%20Report-1.pdf. Accessed: 05.11.2021.
  33. Edelman Trust Barometer 2020. UK Supplement #TrustBarometer. Available from: https://www.edelman.co.uk/sites/g/files/aatuss301/files/2020-02/2020%20Edelman%20Trust%20Barometer%20UK%20Launch%20Deck.pdf. Accessed: 05.11.2021.
  34. Li J, Zhou Y, Yao J, Liu X. An empirical investigation of trust in AI in a Chinese petrochemical enterprise based on institutional theory. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):13564. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-92904-7
  35. Oláh J, Hidayat YA, Gavurova B, et al. Trust levels within categories of information and communication technology companies. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(6):e0252773. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252773
  36. Spadaro G, Gangl K, Van Prooijen J-W, et al. Enhancing feelings of security: How institutional trust promotes interpersonal trust. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(9):e0237934. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237934
  37. Twaddle S. Building trust boosts business results. MGMA Connex. 2011;11(10):28–29.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2021 Solovyova S.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).