The ontology of individuality of v.a. konev in the context of modern philosophical anthropology

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

This article is devoted to an attempt to comprehend the ontology of individuality of V.A. Konev through the prism of the development of modern philosophical anthropology. The study deals with the concept of individuality in the works of V.A. Konev through significant modern philosophical anthropology projects as metaphysics a posteriori by M.K. Mamardashvili, the ethics of desubjectivation by G. Agamben and the transcendental empiricism of G. Deleuze. Individuality is considered to be a potential, forceful, energetic being, generating itself by its own ability to exist, by its unique manner, aimed at revealing and affirming itself in the world. The specificity of individuality consists of the ability to endow existence with being, to participate in the production of meaning. The authors consider the described individuality as a necessary ontological condition of the cultural world, the formation of a social order.

About the authors

Artur S. Kostomarov

Samara National Research University

Author for correspondence.
Email: arthur_boyard@mail.ru

Candidate of Philosophical Sciences, Associate Professor at the Department of Philosophy, Social and Humanitarian Institute

Russian Federation, Samara

References

  1. Agamben Dzh. Gryadushchee soobshchestvo. Transl. from Ital. Dm. Novikov. Moscow; 2008. (In Russ.)
  2. Agamben Dzh. Otkrytoe. Chelovek i zhivotnoe. Transl. from Ital. and Germ. B.M. Skuratov. Moscow; 2012. (In Russ.)
  3. Delez Zh. Razlichie i povtorenie. Transl. from French N.B. Man’kovskaya, E.P. Yurovskaya. Saint Petersburg; 1998. (In Russ.)
  4. Delez Zh, Gvattari F. Anti-Edip. Kapitalizm i shizofreniya. Transl. from French D. Kralechkin. Ekaterinburg; 2007. (In Russ.)
  5. Konev VA. Dantovy koordinaty (problema opredeleniya cennostnogo bytiya). In: Konev V.A. Ontologiya kul’tury (Izbrannye raboty). Samara; 1998. Р. 65–85. (In Russ.)
  6. Konev VA. Kritika opyta soznaniya: Samarskie seminary po traktatu M.K. Mamardashvili i A.M. Pyatigorskogo “Simvol i soznanie”. Samara; 2008. (In Russ.)
  7. Konev VA. Seminarskie besedy po “Kartezianskim razmyshleniyam” M.K. Mamardashvili. Samara; 1996. (In Russ.)
  8. Konev VA. Smysly kul’tury. Samara; 2016. (In Russ.)
  9. Konev VA. Transtsendental’nyi empirizm Zh. Deleza: Seminar po “Razlichiyu i povtoreniyu”. Samara; 2001. (In Russ.)
  10. Konev VA. Philosophy of culture and paradigms of philosophical thinking. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences. 1991;(6):16–30. (In Russ.)
  11. Lekhtsier VL. Vvedenie v fenomenologiyu khudozhestvennogo opyta. Samara; 2000. (In Russ.)
  12. Mamardashvili MK. Kartezianskie razmyshleniya (yanvar’ 1981). Ed. by Ju.P. Senokosov. Moscow; 1993. (In Russ.)
  13. Mamardashvili MK, Pyatigorskii AM. Simvol i soznanie. Moscow: Gnozis; 2009. (In Russ.)
  14. Nansi Zh-L. O sobytii. In: Filosofiya Martina Khaideggera i sovremennost’. Moscow: Nauka; 1991. (In Russ.)
  15. Nansi Zh-L. Segodnya. In: Ad Marginem’ 93. Ezhegodnik. Moscow: Ad Marginem; 1994. (In Russ.)

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2021 Kostomarov A.S.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).