Email this article PRIVATE AND PUBLIC IN SOCIO-PHILOSOPHICAL TRADITIONAND FEMINIST THEORY: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
- Authors: Kostritskaia T.A1
-
Affiliations:
- Saratov State University
- Issue: Vol 19, No 3-4 (2019)
- Pages: 28-32
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2410-3764/article/view/43809
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/2072-2354.2019.19.2.28-32
- ID: 43809
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The article is devoted to the consideration of the public/private dichotomy in the socio-philosophical tradition and feminist theory. It is shown that the socio-philosophical tradition, exploring it without taking into account the gender aspect, is unable, as a result, to detect some key elements of this dichotomy. At the same time, the feminist theory, which does not pay enough attention to the public sphere, mixes its economic and political aspects. Besides, the insufficient attention of the feminist theory to the concepts of publicity and privacy leads to their status as unconscious research prerequisites. It is concluded that the study of the problem of private and public requires combining the considered traditions in a single theoretical field.
Keywords
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
T. A Kostritskaia
Saratov State University
Email: taiskostrickaya@gmail.com
Master Student at the Department of Theoretical and Social Philosophy
References
- Арендт Х. Vita activa, или О деятельной жизни / Пер. с нем. и англ. В.В. Бибихина. - СПб.: Алетейя, 2000. -437 с
- Гегель Г.В.Ф. Философия права / Пер. с нем. Б.Г. Столпнера, М.И. Левиной. - М.: Мысль, 1990. -524 с
- Локк Д. Два трактата о правлении / Под ред. И.С. Нарского, А.Л. Субботина; пер. с англ. А.Н. Савиной]. Сочинения в трех томах. Т. 3. - М.: Мысль, 1988. - С. 135-405
- Оукин С.М. Гендер: публичное и приватное // Гендерная реконструкция политических систем / Под ред. Н.М. Степановой, Е.В. Кочкиной. - СПб.: Алетейя, 2004. - C. 920-945. (Серия «Тендерная коллекция»)
- Фрейзер Н. Что критического в критической теории? Хабермас и гендер // Феминистская критика и ревизия истории политической философии / Пер. с англ. О.В. Дворкиной; под ред. Н.А. Блохиной. - М.: Российская политическая энциклопедия (РОССПЭН), 2005. - С. 347-379
- Хабермас Ю. Структурное изменение публичной сферы: Исследования относительно категории буржуазного общества (с предисловием к переизданию 1990 года) / Пер. с нем. В.В. Иванова. - М.: Весь мир, 2016. - 344 с
- Шкудунова Ю.В. Концептуальная основа «публичности» и «приватности» // Вестник Омского университета. - 2007. - № 4. - С. 65-68
- Elshtain JB. Public man, private woman: women in social and political thought. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press; 1993. 408 p
- Higgins TE. Reviving the Public. Private Distinction in Feminist Theorizing Symposium on Unfinished Feminist Business. Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 1999-2000;75(3):847-867.
- Pateman C. The sexual contract. Stanford (CA): Stanford University Press; 1988. 264 p.
- Pateman С. Feminist critiques of the public. Private Dichotomy. Ed. by S.I. Benn, G.F. Gaus. Public and private in social life. New York: St. Martin’s Press; 1983. P. 281-306.
- Rosaldo MZ. Woman, culture, and society: a theoretical overview. In: Woman, culture, and society. Ed. by M.Z. Rosaldo, L. Lamphere. Stanford (CA): Stanford University Press; 1974. P. 17-42.
- World Heritage Encyclopedia. SCUM Manifesto. Solanas V. AK Press, Second-wave feminism, Anarcha-feminism, Reference desk/Archives/Humanities [cited 2015 July 19]. London: Verso Books; 2004. 96 p.
- Weintraub J. The theory and politics of the public. Private distinction. In: Public and private in thought and practice. Perspectives on a Grand Dichotomy. Ed. by J. Weintraub, K. Kumar. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 1997. P. 1-42.
Supplementary files
