Email this article A hunam is the body of social being: divercity of collective socio-historical memory frameworks
- Authors: Dakhin A.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Nizhny Novgorod Institute of Management – the branch of Russia Academy of National Economics and Public Administration under the President of Russia Federation
- Issue: Vol 21, No 3-4 (2021)
- Pages: 43-46
- Section: Philosophical sciences
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2410-3764/article/view/89700
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/2072-2354.2021.21.2.43-46
- ID: 89700
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Reflecting some contemporary trends social environment, the author underlines some of them which have increased the level of memory studies discussion. The paper reflects a trend of the postmodern pluralism field, where the social memory is defined as an object for free constructing. The alternative philosophical approach demands to rethink this pluralism by the decision of methodological choice towards memo philosophy which climes the idea of fundamental mission of social memory for social history and future development.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Andrey V. Dakhin
Nizhny Novgorod Institute of Management – the branch of Russia Academy of National Economics and Public Administration under the President of Russia Federation
Author for correspondence.
Email: nn9222@rambler.ru
Doctor of Philosophy, Professor of Department of Philosophy, Sociology and Psychology of Management
Russian Federation, Nizhny NovgorodReferences
- Assman A. Dlinnaya ten’ proshlogo. Memorial’naya kul’tura i istoricheskaya politika: per.s nem. B. Hlebnikova. Moscow; 2014. (In Russ.)
- Assman Ya. Kul’turnaya pamyat’. Pis’mo, pamyat’ o proshlom i politicheskaya identichnost’ v vysokih kul’turah drevnosti: per. M.M. Sokol’skoj. Moscow; 2004. (In Russ.)
- Vygotskij LS. Soznanie kak problema psihologii povedeniya. In: Sobranie sochinenii v 6 t. Moscow: Pedagogika; 1984. Vol. 1. P. 78–98. (In Russ.)
- Grekhem LR. Estestvoznanie, filosofiya i nauka o chelovecheskom povedenii v Sovetskom Soyuze; per. s angl. Moscow: Politizdat; 1991. P. 103–162. (In Russ.)
- Dakhin AV. Social development and calls of collective memory: prospect of philosophical conceptualisation of memory studies. Voprosy filosofii. 2010;(8):42–44. (In Russ.)
- Dahin AV. Sinergeticheskaya paradigma: korrekciya po probleme istoricheskogo pamyatovaniya. In: Sinergeticheskaya paradigma. Social’naya sinergetika. Moscow: Progress-Tradiciya; 2009. P. 156–182. (In Russ.)
- Zhizhek S. Shchekotlivyj sub”ekt: otsutstvuyushchij centr politicheskoj ontologii: per. s angl. S. Shchukinoj. Moscow; 2014. (In Russ.)
- Il’enkov EV. Dialekticheskaya logika. Ocherki istorii i teorii. Moscow: Politizdat; 1984. (In Russ.)
- Kornev V. Chelovek kak pustoe oznachayushchee v diskurse sovremennogo masskul’ta [internet]. Likbez. Literaturnyj al’manah, 2006. No. 29. Maj-iyun’. (In Russ.). Available from: http://www.lik-bez.ru/archive/zine_number496/zine_clever501/publication526. Accessed: 04.04.2021.
- Kutyryov VA. Poslednee celovanie. Chelovek kak tradiciya. Saint Petersburg: Aletejya; 2015. (In Russ.)
- Le Goff Zh. Istoriya i pamyat’: per. s fr. Moscow; 2013. (In Russ.)
- Luman N. Obshchestvo kak social’naya sistema. In: Obshchestvo obshchestva: v 5 kn. Kn.1. Moscow: Logos; 2011. Р. 15–201. (In Russ.)
- Rikyor P. Pamyat’, istoriya, zabvenie: per. s fr. Moscow; 2004. (In Russ.)
- Trofimova LI. M. Hajdegger o yazyke kak znakovom vyrazhenii reflektirovannogo bytiya. Proceedings of conference “Aktual’nye problemy social’noj kommunikacii”; 2010 May 20; N. Novgorod. P. 620–622. (In Russ.)
- Hajdegger M. Zakon tozhdestva. In: Razgovor na prosyolochnoj doroge. Sbornik. Ed. by A.L. Dobrohotova. Moscow; 1991. Р. 69–79. (In Russ.)
- Hajdegger M. Izrechenie Anaksagora. In: Razgovor na prosyolochnoj doroge. Sbornik. Ed. by A.L. Dobrohotova. Moscow; 1991. Р. 26–68. (In Russ.)
- Hal’bvaks M. Social’nye ramki pamyati: per. s fr. i vstupit. stat’ya M.N. Zenkina. Moscow; 2007. (In Russ.)
Supplementary files
