Effectiveness of cooperative grouping in developing reading skills of university level EFL learners

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Background. Collaborative Strategic Reading (CSR) is an instructional method in which students work together in a cooperative framework, jointly construct a model of text and come to its potential meaning through discussions.

Purpose. A quasi-experimental pretest-posttest non-equivalent control group research design was used to examine the effects of cooperative grouping within the framework of CSR, with the aim of determining whether cooperative grouping is effective in developing EFL students’ reading skills.

Method. The response variables included the students’ scores on questions testing Vocabulary, Factual Information, Prose Summary, Sentence Simplification, Reference Question and Insert text, whereas the explanatory variable was group membership (+/- cooperative), measured across three testing times (the beginning, middle and the end of the experimental intervention).

Results. The results indicate that the students exposed to CSR within cooperative groups significantly developed those reading skills which focus on the comprehension of global information – prose summary, insert text and reference question. A possible explanation is that, in order to answer these questions, readers must approach the text in a holistic manner and focus on its main ideas, which seems to be facilitated by discussions in heterogeneous teams and negotiations of meaning resulting from those discussions.

Conclusion. The main pedagogical implication of the results concerns the need for introducing cooperative grouping as an alternative to a typical university-level foreign language classroom, allowing teachers to organize an effective, interactive context for reading academic texts in English.

About the authors

J. Topalov

University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia

Author for correspondence.
Email: jagoda.topalov@gmail.com

References

  1. Alrayah, H. (2018). The effectiveness of cooperative learning activities in enhancing EFL learners' fluency. English Language Teaching, 11(4), 21-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n4p21
  2. Anderson, J. (2013).Rules of the mind (e-book ed.). Psychology Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315806938
  3. Becker, A. (2016). L2 students' performance on listening comprehension items targeting local and global information. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 24, 1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.07.004
  4. Bernhardt, E. B. (2011). Understanding advanced second-language reading. Routledge.
  5. Berry, K., Johnston, J., & Mielke, P. (2018). The measurement of association. A permutation statistical approach. Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98926-6_2
  6. Boardman, A. G., Vaughn, S., Buckley, P., Reutebuch, C., Roberts, G., & Klingner, J. (2016). Collaborative strategic reading for students with learning disabilities in upper elementary classrooms. Exceptional Children, 82(4), 409-427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402915625067
  7. Bremer, C., Vaughn, S., Clapper, A., & Kim, A. (2002). Collaborative Strategic Reading (CSR): Improving secondary students' reading comprehension skills. In Research to practice brief (vol. 1, pp. 2-9). National Center on Secondary Education and Transition.
  8. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  9. Cohen, A. & Upton, T. (2006). Strategies in responding to the New TOEFL reading tasks (TOEFL Monograph No. MS-33). Educational Testing Service. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.2006.tb02012.x
  10. Cunningham, W., Sanchez-Puerta, M. L., & Wuerml, A. (Eds.), (2010). Active labor market programs for youth. A framework to guide youth employment interventions. World Bank. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/11690.
  11. Davies, R. S., Dean, D. L., & Ball, N. (2013). Flipping the classroom and instructional technology integration in a college-level information systems spreadsheet course. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61, 563-580. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-013-9305-6
  12. Estes. M. D., Ingram, R., & Liu, J. C. (2014). A review of flipped classroom research, practice, and technologies. International HETL Review, 4. https://www.hetl.org/feature-articles/a-review-of-flipped-classroom-research-practice-and-technologies.
  13. Fan, Y. (2010). The effect of comprehension strategy instruction on EFL learners' reading comprehension. Asian Social Science, 6(8), 19-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v6n8p19
  14. Fan, Y. (2015). Fostering learner autonomy through a socio-cognitive model of reading comprehension instruction. British Journal of Education, Society & Behavioural Science, 9(2), 105-117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/BJESBS/2015/18161
  15. Fen, G. (2011). Theme-based group teaching of college oral English: Endorsed by students in China EFL context. English Language Teaching, 4(1), 33-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v4n1p33
  16. Gall, M., Gall, J., & Borg, W. (2007). Educational Research: An Introduction (8th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
  17. Goldman, S. R., Britt, M. A., Brown, W., Cribb, G., George, M., Greenleaf, C., Lee, C. D., & Shanahan, C. (2016). Disciplinary literacies and learning to read for understanding: A conceptual framework for disciplinary literacy. Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 219-246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1168741
  18. Hitchcock, J., Kurki, A., Dimino, J., Wilkins, C., & Gersten, R. (2009). Evaluating the collaborative strategic reading intervention: An overview of randomized controlled trial options. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 14, Article 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7275/sakx-4c50
  19. Jamieson, J., Jones, S., Kirsch, I., Mosenthal, P., & Taylor, C. (1999). TOEFL 2000 framework: A working paper (TOEFL Monograph No. MS-16). Educational Testing Service.
  20. Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (2005). New developments in social interdependence theory. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 131(4), 285-358. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3200/MONO.131.4.285-358
  21. Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (2008). Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning: The teacher's role. In R. M. Gillies, A. F. Ashman, & J. Terwel (Eds.), The teacher's role in implementing cooperative learning in the classroom (pp. 9-37). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-70892-8_1
  22. Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365-379. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09339057
  23. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2015). Theoretical approaches to cooperative learning. In R. M. Gillies (Ed.), Collaborative learning: Developments in research and practice (pp. 17-46). Nova Science.
  24. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (2016). Cooperative learning and teaching citizenship in democracies. International Journal of Educational Research, 76, 162-177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2015.11.009
  25. Johnson, D., Johnson, R., & Smith, K. (2014). Cooperative learning: Improving university instruction by basing practice on validated theory. Journal on Excellence in University Teaching, 25(4), 1-26.
  26. Jones, N. (2002). Relating the ALTE framework to the Common European Framework of Reference. In Council of Europe (Eds.), Case studies on the use of the Common European Framework of Reference (pp. 167-183). Cambridge University Press.
  27. Karabuga, F. & Kaya E. S. (2013). Collaborative strategic reading practice with adult EFL learners: A collaborative and reflective approach to reading. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 106, 621-630. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.071
  28. Karimi, M. N. (2018). The mediated/unmediated contributions of language proficiency and prior knowledge to L2 multiple-texts comprehension: A structural equation modelling analysis. Applied Linguistics, 39(6), 912-932. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amw059
  29. Kim, A., Vaughn, S., Klingner, J., Woodruff, A., Klein Reutebuch, C., & Kouzekanani, K. (2006). Improving the reading comprehension of middle school students with disabilities through computer-assisted collaborative strategic reading. Remedial and Special Education, 27(4), 235-249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325060270040401
  30. Klingner, J., & Vaughn, S. (2000). The helping behaviors of fifth graders while using collaborative strategic reading during ESL content classes. TESOL Quarterly, 34(1), 69-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3588097
  31. Klingner, J. K., Vaughn, S., Boardman, A., & Swanson, E. (2012). Now we get it! Boosting comprehension with collaborative strategic reading. Jossey-Bass.
  32. Kremmel, B., & Schmitt, N. (2016).Interpreting vocabulary test scores: What do various item formats tell us about learners' ability to employ words? Language Assessment Quarterly, 13(4), 377-392. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2016.1237516
  33. Law, Y. K. (2011). The effects of cooperative learning on enhancing Hong-Kong fifth graders' achievement goals, autonomous motivation and reading proficiency. Journal of Research in Reading, 34(4), 402-425. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01445.x
  34. Martínez, A. C. L. (2022). The effect of perceived interest and prior knowledge on L2 reading comprehension via several assessment methods in a higher education context. European Journal of Language and Literature, 8(2), 45-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26417/ejls-2019.v5i1-194
  35. Mendieta, J., Múnera, L., Olmos, T., Onatra, C., Pérez, P., & Rojas, E. (2015). Fostering reading comprehension and self-directed learning in a collaborative strategic reading (CSR) setting. Íkala, revista de lenguaje y cultura, 20(1), 15-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v20n1a02
  36. Milić, S. (2016). Analiza interkulturalnih kompetencija u nacionalnom okviru kurikuluma Republike Srbije i poređenje sa nacionalnim okvirima kurikuluma referentnih zemalja [An analysis of intercultural competences in the Framework of the national curriculum of the Republic of Serbia and its comparison with the national frameworks of referent countries]. In D. Petrović & T. Jokić (Eds.), Interkulturalno obrazovanje u Srbiji - regulativni okvir, stanje i mogućnosti za razvoj (pp. 45-67). Centar za obrazovne politike.
  37. Namaziandost, E., Homayouni, M., & Rahmani, P. (2020). The impact of cooperative learning approach on the development of EFL learners' speaking fluency. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 7(1), 1780811. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2020.1780811
  38. Ning, H., & Hornby, G. (2014). The impact of cooperative learning on tertiary EFL learners' motivation. Educational Review, 66(1), 108-124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2013.853169
  39. Reynolds, D. (2017).Interactional scaffolding for reading comprehension: A systematic review. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice, 66(1), 135-156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2381336917718820
  40. Schmitt, N. (1999). The relationship between TOEFL vocabulary items and meaning, association, collocation, and word-class knowledge. Language Testing, 16, 189-216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229901600204
  41. Soto, C., Gutierrez de Blume, A. P., Carrasco Bernal, M. A., & Contreras Castro, M. A. (2020). The role of meta-cognitive cues on the comprehension of proficient and poor readers. Journal of Research in Reading, 43(3), 272-289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12303
  42. Sparks, R., Patton, J., Ganschow, L., & Humbach, N. (2009). Long-term crosslinguistic transfer of skills from L1 to L2. Language Learning, 59(1), 203-243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00504.x
  43. Topalov, J, Bjelica, M., & Krombholc, V. (2015). Stavovi studenata prema kolaboraciji u univerzitetskoj nastavi engleskog jezika. [Students' attitudes towards collaboration in the university level EFL instruction]. In B. Radić-Bojanić (Ed.), Strani jezici na Filozofskom fakultetu: primenjenolingvistička istraživanja (pp. 107-126). Filozofski fakultet.
  44. Topalov, J., & Radić-Bojanić, B. (2016). Collaborative strategic reading instruction as a determinant of developed affective variables. In S. Gudurić & M. Stefanović (Eds.), Jezici i kulture u vremenu i prostoru (pp. 507-517). Filozofski fakultet.
  45. Topalov, J., Radić-Bojanić, B., & Bruner, D. (2017). Thai and Serbian student attitudes regarding collaborative tasks in the EFL classroom. In B. Vujin & M. Radin-Sabadoš (Eds.), English studies today: Words and visions (p. 445-461). Filozofski fakultet.
  46. Vaughn, S., Klingner, J., Swanson, E. A., Boardman, A. G., Roberts, G., Mohammed, S., & Still-Spisak, S. J. (2011). Efficacy of collaborative strategic reading with middle school students. American Educational Research Journal, 48, 938-964. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831211410305
  47. Wei, P., & Tang, Y. (2015). Cooperative learning in English class of Chinese junior high school. Creative Education, 6(03), 397. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2015.63039
  48. Zoghi, M., Mustapha, R., & Maasum, T. N. R. B. T. M. (2010). Collaborative strategic reading with university EFL learners. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 41(1), 67-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2010.10850336

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.